(1) BITE ATTACK FOLLOWS AI ART CHALLENGE AT BRISBANE CON. “Man banned from Oz Comic-Con after biting incident in Brisbane” reports Australia’s ABC News.
A man has been banned from Oz Comic-Con after allegedly biting one of the artists on Sunday afternoon.
Police were called to the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre in South Bank.
A police spokesperson told 612 ABC no formal complaint was filed, but they were aware of the incident.
“All parties have been banned from the venue and future events,” the spokesperson said.
Footage supplied to the ABC shows Zyllion stall-holder Bowie Chong in a heated argument with another vendor, Victoria Manton-Williams at about 2:40pm.
Manton-Williams told the ABC she asked Chong whether his art was AI-generated, prompting him to tell her to “f*** off”.
Manton-Williams alleged Chong snatched the phone away from her artist friend who was filming the scene.
Manton-Williams said her friend pushed Chong, who then allegedly bit her friend’s arm and “latched on”.
Manton-Williams said she ran over and tried to pull Chong off of her friend and that she was pushed to the ground and kicked in the arm.
Manton-Williams said her friend went to the hospital to receive antibiotics for the bite, which had turned dark red from bruising.
She said the whole encounter was bizarre.
“I’ve never actually heard of anyone getting bitten at a convention in general,” Manton-Williams said.
“I did not even think it was in the realm of possibility that when I went up to ask this guy a question that he would run out and bite someone.
“It’s not normal behaviour — not even cosplayers go around biting each other.”
Chong has not responded to the ABC’s requests for comment. Zyllion’s website and social media pages have been deleted….
… Oz Comic-Con would not say what its policy was on AI-generated art or products at its conventions….
(2) IMAGINARY FRIEND…OR SOMETHING. Cory Doctorow’s latest essay on chatbots is well worth reading. “The Claude Delusion (21 Sep 2026)” at Pluralistic.
…Figuring out intentions is our minds’ reflexive preoccupation. It’s what keeps us from dying in traffic, it’s what lets us win at poker. It’s the key to love and parenting, to effective management and “managing up.” It’s why we get mad at people, and why we forgive them. It’s why our hearts race in sympathy with the characters in a book or on a screen. It’s the automatic and irresistible starting point for every encounter with a poem, a song, a book or a sculpture. It’s the most fundamental difference between a sculpture of a tree and a tree: the tree grew all on its own, while the sculpture was made, on purpose, by another person with another mind.
This reflex to attribute intention explains why AI is so controversial, so compelling, and so eerie. Mark Fisher defines eeriness as “when there is something present where there should be nothing, or if there is nothing present when there should be something”:
https://www.programmablemutter.com/p/large-language-models-are-uncanny
To look upon an AI-generated text or image is to look upon a thing that was extruded, not chosen. You can slip and prompt an AI-generated image of a sunset, and it will embody no intentionality on anyone’s part.
This isn’t something we have any experience with. When we see a painting, we reflexively interpret it as having a painter. When we read a book, we reflexively impute auctorial intent to its words. When we converse, we reflexively form a theory about the mind directing the other half of the conversation….
…To “converse” with an AI is to carry on a dialog with a fictional character, who is no more real than the imaginary people in a novel. Indeed, the chatbot is less real than the character, because the character is the product of another mind, while the chatbot’s words are the product of complex mathematical operations conducted over a massive database of all the words humans have uttered, arranged by their frequency in relation to one another. When that math makes something beautiful or striking, it’s like a sunset: no matter how striking it is, it’s empty. No one chose those colors. No one chose those words.
In other words, when we interact with an AI, we hallucinate the person on the other side of the interaction. Those hallucinations are far more common and far more consequential than any AI-generated “hallucinations” (these are more properly called “errors” or “defects”)….
(3) CRIMINAL KNOWLEDGE. Publishers Weekly reports “Unsealed Files Show Open AI/Microsoft Knew Copying Was Illegal and Could Hurt Authors”.
Less than two weeks after the Authors Guild and Open AI/Microsoft filed for summary judgment in their copyright infringement case, newly unsealed comments made in briefs filed by the tech giants reveal that executives knew they were illegally training their products on copyrighted books and that AI generated books would likely displace human-authored books in the market. Moreover, executive comments also suggested that some publishing industry employees will lose their jobs.
One Open AI note of August 2019 states bluntly: “We trained GPT-3 on pirated stuff! No sharing that!”*
The Authors Guild has highlighted some of the now public comments made by OpenAI executives in the case. “The better we do on GPT-X, the more worried genre fiction authors will become about us substituting for them on Amazon,” OpenAI policy director Jack Clark stated in testimony given in May 2020. He further acknowledged that while “there will be a point where a bunch of artists express worry about what we’re doing here and we’ll likely ignore their concerns and release anyway.”
The filings also point to the hiring of Tarun Gogineni in 2022 to lead OpenAI’s efforts to improve the writing quality of its models. The documents show that Gogineni stated that his “research mission” was to create a machine that would supplant human authors. Along those lines, the brief states that Gogineni was aware of authors’ complaints that the ‘datasets are stolen’ and that authors were losing work to AI-generated competition. Nevertheless as the brief goes on, he did not find those complaints ‘all that sympathetic’ and instead viewed them as ‘acceptable economic disruption.’ He wrote that the world would soon experience ‘the death of the reader’ as ‘machines creat[ed] slop for more machines.’”
The hubris Gogineni exhibited about AI replacing human authors is perhaps best exemplified in a tweet that appeared in testimony that if George R.R. Martin dies early “GPT can write the next [S]ong of [I]ce and [F]ire book.”…
(4) YOUR MULTIPLEX CAN’T WAIT FOR DECEMBER 18 TO ARRIVE. “Dunesday: will this be Barbenheimer on steroids – the biggest weekend of cinema ever?” asks the Guardian.
Name: Dunesday.
Age: Nascent.
Appearance: Barbenheimer, but less fun.
I’ve just arrived on this planet. Barbenheimer? The momentous day in July 2023 when Barbie and Oppenheimer were simultaneously released into cinemas worldwide.
And everyone picked sides? Or they saw both films on the same day, causing tonal whiplash from which they may still be recovering.
Fun times. And lucrative times, too. Barbie made $356m (£285m) worldwide on its opening weekend, while Oppenheimer shattered expectations by taking $180m. The £36m spent in UK cinemas that weekend made it the most successful since 2019, while it was the fourth-biggest box office weekend in the US ever.
So the Barbenheimer effect was real? Absolutely. For perhaps the first time, filmgoers en masse saw the dual releases of two blockbusters as complimentary, rather than a contest. Anyway, forget about Barbenheimer, because this December welcomes Dunesday, which will be Barbenheimer on steroids.
Two big films being released on the same day again? That’s right. This time, it’s Avengers: Doomsday and Dune: Part Three. Both come out on 18 December. It’s going to be huge!
I think I’ll pass. What? Why? Dune is the dramatic conclusion of an epic, skilfully told story that has so far made more than $1bn worldwide. Doomsday is the first Avengers film since 2019’s Endgame, which was for a time the biggest movie of all time….
(5) THE AVENGERS TURNS 65. TV Line reminds us, “65 Years Ago, A British Sci-Fi Spy Series Launched And Became A Global Hit”.

Two years before Marvel’s team of the same name debuted in the comics, the British espionage series “The Avengers” premiered, quickly establishing itself as one of the best TV shows of the 1960s. The cult spy-fi series made its bow in the United Kingdom 65 years ago, with its first episode, “Hot Snow,” beamed into households on January 7, 1961. It didn’t arrive in the States until 1966, when ABC picked it up, but once American viewers started watching it, they couldn’t get enough of “The Avengers.”
Created by Sydney Newman, a Canadian screenwriter who would go on to co-create “Doctor Who” in the next few years, “The Avengers” follows secret agent John Steed (Patrick Macnee) as he and a series of partners fight crime and go on elaborate spy adventures. Steed was actually intended as more of a sidekick to David H. Keel (Ian Hendry), a medical doctor who turned vigilante after witnessing his fiancée’s death, but he proved more popular with audiences and was retooled as the main character as a result.
While early seasons were relatively grounded, eventually “The Avengers” embraced more science fiction elements. The heroes used high-tech gadgets and fought robots or killer plants. Steed was joined by a series of female sidekicks over the course of the show’s six-season run, including anthropologist Cathy Gale (Honor Blackman), martial arts expert Emma Peel (future Bond Girl and “Game of Thrones” star Diana Rigg), and spy Tara King (Linda Thorson)….

… “The Avengers” came to be known for its fashion almost as much as its action. John Steed wore a distinctive bowler hat and traditional but sharp suits, a style that’s been dubbed neo-Edwardian. This was all down to Patrick Macnee: Steed wore a trench coat to begin with, but the actor brought his own flair to the character, making him a wry spoof of a typical proper Englishman. “Steed is pretty much me,” he told TV News in 1967. “I feel I’m satirizing my own class.”
The women on the show, meanwhile, wore mod dresses, leather catsuits, and other avant-guard clothing. The catsuits (which were actually faux-leather because the real material was too restrictive for the hand-to-hand combat scenes) were initially a practical consideration. Dresses got in the way of the fighting Honor Blackman’s Cathy Gale did each episode, so designer Michael Whittaker was brought in to design the show’s catsuits and the rest is fashion history….
(6) DECADE’S BEST – SO FAR. CBR.com has rolled out its list of “10 Best Sci-Fi Novels of the 2020s, Ranked After the 2026 Hugo Awards”.In science fiction and fantasy, there is no award greater than the annual Hugo Award. Established in 1953 at the 11th World Science Fiction Convention, it is the oldest and most prestigious international award for science fiction and fantasy literature — other than the Nebula Awards — and though it covers all forms of speculative and genre-bending fiction, the Hugo Award is considered sci-fi’s highest honor.
Indicating the best works from the previous year, they are nominated by members of the World Science Fiction Society across 17 categories, including Best Novel, Best Novella, and Best Series — one of the newest categories that was introduced in 2017 and was recently awarded to one of the best works of military sci-fi, John Scalzi’s Old Man’s War in 2026. Showcasing the best the genre has to offer, the Hugo Awards are the most trusted reading guide chosen by the fans for the fans.The list includes –
Death of the Author Uses a Book-Within-a-Book Structure

Published in 2025, Death of the Author is Nnedi Okorafor’s most recent novel. A finalist for the 2026 Hugo Award for Best Novel, it is an Africanfuturist story with a metafictional narrative. It follows Zelu, a paraplegic Nigerian-American writer, whose life changes completely after she writes a breakout sci-fi masterpiece called “Rusted Robots.” The book alternates between Zelu’s real-world struggles, excerpts from Rusted Robots, and interview transcripts.
Praised for blurring the lines between sci-fi and literary metafiction, the novel is a deep character study with family drama and dystopian robot narratives. However, its hybridity means some pure sci-fi readers find it less traditional than standard genre fiction. Death of the Author has received critical acclaim for its in-depth exploration of disability, artificial intelligence, identity, autonomy, and how stories can reshape both the author and the world.
Nnedi Okorafor shared her reaction to being on the list with Facebook readers.
This is a cool list and has a bunch of books I am really pleased to be included with, and a few I needed to be reminded about.
Also, now that my novel’s been out for a while… it’s time to say this louder: DEATH OF THE AUTHOR is a lot lot lot more than science fiction…unless my own life and family, what it is to be Nigerian American, and what it is to move through the world as a black woman with disabilities are all science fiction. In many ways, it is a “how to” novel about how to write africanfuturism, as well.
I wrote it the way it’s written because that’s how the story arrived. I thought I was writing two books at once when I wrote it. The whole “book within a book” thing was never on my mind when I wrote it. That’s something I started to hear after it was published. I’m a “pantser” (one who flies by the seat of her pants, no outlining) and I write nonlinearly. Structure does not guide me.
This novel is so many things that it is INDEED un-catagorizable if you taste and swallow it whole…yet I guess it’s easiest for people to reduce it to a category they know I like to play in because otherwise, where will you find it?, how will people describe it to friends so that they don’t feel stupid or silly?, how do you make it not a mouthful?, how do you refer to it?, what is it if it’s many things at once?
It should be ok to not know what to expect, to relax, trust, and let the story guide you. Submit to the story. Be quiet. Relinquish that control for a while. Especially in this day and age of social media.
Imagine it:
“What are you reading?”
“Actually…I don’t know. Let me just see where it goes and I’ll let you know later.”
DEATH OF THE AUTHOR is a Nnedi Novel, which means it’s many things all at once, some old, some new. That should be enough, imho. Alas.
(7) SHELFIES. Shelfies, edited by Lavie Tidhar and Jared Shurin, “Takes a unique peek each week into one of our contributors’ weird and wonderful bookshelves.” A recent entry was Shelfies #103: Stephanie Feldman.
Stephanie Feldman is the author of the novels Saturnalia, a Locus Award finalist, and The Angel of Losses, a Barnes & Noble Discovery Great New Writers Selection, Crawford Fantasy Award winner, and Mythopoeic Fantasy Award finalist. Her first story collection, The Night Parade and Other Stories, is forthcoming in October 2026, and her next novel, In Summer She Turns Cruel, will arrive in 2028. Read her short story “The Genius and the Devil” in the new anthology The Elements of Dark Academia. She’s online at stephaniefeldman.com, Bluesky, and Instagram.
(8) DYSON OR STAPLEDON? WonderDome Planetarium says “Let’s talk… Dyson Sphere and Intelligent Aliens”.
A Dyson sphere constructed by an advanced alien civilization is a staple ingredient of space science fiction: Star Wars, Star Trek, you name it. We humans could do with a Dyson sphere too. Just imaging… collecting 1036 W of the Sun’s energy instead of 1017 W the Earth receives now! Wouldn’t that be wonderful? But wait, are you at a loss as to what we are talking about?
Dyson sphere is an idea, a mental experiment, named after a great American-British physicist Freeman Dyson. Strictly speaking, Freeman Dyson was not the first to come up with the concept. It was inspired by Olaf Stapledon’s 1937 science fiction novel “Star Maker” (you can download the book in pdf format here).
Dyson himself referred to the construction as “an artificial biosphere”. He disapproved of the widely used name “Dyson sphere” (thanks for that, SETI enthusiasts) and thought that “Stapledon’s sphere” would have been more appropriate….
…Many people imagine a Dyson Sphere as a solid hollow ball around a star. Well, that is wrong! If you want to build a Dyson Sphere, make it out of separate elements, such as solar panels, mirrors or similar, that either orbit your star or hover above its surface. (And if you are making a SOLID Dyson shell, please STOP. They are unstable and will not last long!)…
(9) TODAY’S BIRTHDAY.
[Written by Paul Weimer.]
September 21, 1912 — Chuck Jones. (Died 2002.)
By Paul Weimer: In talking about Chuck Jones, animator extraordinaire mainly known for his Warner Bros. characters, I have to dig in my brain for a question I had not actively thought of before: What was the first Warner Bros cartoon that I watched that featured one of his creations? This was not as easy a question as I thought. The list of his creations (or characters he helped create and develop) is long. Michigan J. Frog. The neurotic Claude the Cat. The large orange hairy monster Gossamer. The Wise guy Charlie the Dog.

But he’s much more well-known for helping develop Bugs Bunny, Marvin the Martian, Pepé Le Pew, Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner. (Pepé may not have aged well in our modern sensibilities–let’s face it, a sex pest male Skunk is not funny.)
Bugs, Marvin, Wile E. and The Road Runner are classic characters. Bugs is the Trickster, Marvin is the put-upon martinet, Wile is the not-as-smart-as-he-thinks-he-is and the Road Runner is also a form of the Trickster, but more benign in some ways. He really just does want to live his life, and it is the obsessive Coyote who interrupts it. I do love when the characters mix it up, such as when Bugs meets Wile E. And Marvin? I think his best short is not with his traditional adversary, Bugs, at all.
So thinking hard and long about it, the first Chuck Jones character that I remember seeing was most definitely a Bugs Bunny cartoon with Gossamer as the monster. It was also notable for having a mad scientist character who was basically a caricature of Peter Lorre. So, long before I saw Casablanca, or The Maltese Falcon, I saw Peter Lorre in a Bugs Bunny cartoon. I had no idea who he was supposed to be, at the time, but now I find it weirdly wonderful that the animated Peter Lorre is as big, or bigger, than the actual actor.
But my favorite Chuck Jones character has to be, of course, Marvin the Martian. Forever trying to blow up the Earth because it obstructs his view of Venus, it would make him very very angry not to mention Duck Dodgers in the 24-and-1/2th Century, which may be the epitome of Daffy Duck’s animated career. Although I do enjoy his pairings and face-offs with Bugs, having Daffy face off against Marvin, with Porky Pig as his sidekick, is absolute genius (no wonder why Garibaldi of Babylon 5 loves it so).
Chuck Jones also directed the wonderful short film The Dot and the Line, which I mentioned in my Norton Juster birthday. It is one of the best animated short films I’ve ever seen and enchants me to this day.
(10) COMICS SECTION.
- Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal ponders Sith names.
- Barney and Clyde talk collectible comics.
- Brevity defines a tendency.
- Eyebeam knows the market.
- FurBabies watch a Harryhausen flick.
- Lio adds excitement.
- Questionable Content gets into fandoms.
- The Argyle Sweater stays the same.
- The Other Coast reveals how some movies get made.
(11) PIKACHU FLOATS WHERE THE HUGO ONCE DID. “Pikachu in space! New ESA-Pokémon partnership sends the electric mouse to the ISS” – Space.com has the story.


Pikachu is one of Earth’s newest outer space ambassadors, thanks to a new partnership.
The European Space Agency (ESA) and The Pokémon Company International (TPCI) have teamed up to honor World Space Week 2026, which runs from Oct. 4 through Oct. 10.
To kick off this inaugural collaboration, a Pikachu toy floated aboard the International Space Station from April 11 to June 17, enjoying 67 days in orbit and completing 1,040 trips around our big blue marble. Pikachu joined seven human astronauts aboard the orbiting lab, including ESA astronaut Sophie Adenot, who came up on SpaceX’s Crew-12 mission.

(12) BOLO FOR BLACK HOLES. “Large Hadron Collider is still on the hunt for short-lived quantum black holes and a theory of everything” at Space.com.
When we think about black holes, we tend to imagine dominant cosmic titans that consume everything around them. However, for many years scientists have mused over the existence of far more diminutive, but short-lived black holes. Using the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, scientists have been on the hunt for quantum black holes that are smaller than atoms. This is a tricky proposition, as these black holes would have a lifetime as diminutive as their size.
The discovery of such objects could help solve some of the mysteries surrounding the structure of space and time, united as a four-dimensional entity called “spacetime.”
It could also help researchers develop a theory of quantum gravity that unites the thus far incompatible theories of general relativity, our best description of gravity, and quantum physics, the framework that describes the universe on scales smaller than atoms…
… Unfortunately, this search has thus far been fruitless, but that doesn’t mean that it has been useless. Null results in this case redefine the search parameters for these tiny black holes and help perfect methods that can be used to hunt for new particles beyond the Standard Model of particle physics.…
(13) TWO FOR THE PRICE OF ONE. “Human brain is two separate organs, Stanford Medicine-led research finds”.
For centuries, scientists have thought of the brain as a single, unified organ. But new research led by Stanford Medicine reveals that what we call the brain is two distinct organs that evolved independently over hundreds of millions of years.
The discovery overturns a prevailing model of brain development. For decades researchers have subscribed to the theory that there is a single progenitor cell early in development that gives rise to the entire brain. This model suggested all parts of the brain shared a common developmental origin.
The new research finding shows that the human brain consists of two ancient nervous systems cleverly packaged together — a more primitive part that regulates our hearts’ beating, our breathing and other functions, and another that makes us distinctly human, capable of poetry, mathematics and wondering about our own origins.
“We’ve shown for the first time that the front of the brain arises from a totally different progenitor cell than the back of the brain,” said Kyle Loh, PhD, associate professor of developmental biology. “Our discovery means that we can now grow neurons from the back of the brain, the hindbrain, in a petri dish and study their functions.”
The findings were published in Nature Neuroscience Sept. 18. Loh is the senior author. Graduate students Carolyn “C” Dundes and Rayyan Jokhai are co-first authors of the research….
(14) JMS AND BRUCE BOXLEITNER. The Babylon 5 YouTube channel has posted a three-part conversation between showrunner J. Michael Straczynski and actor Bruce Boxleitner.
[Thanks to John King Tarpinian, Cat Eldridge, SF Concatenation’s Jonathan Cowie, Paul Weimer, Juli Marr, Chris Barkley, Mark Roth-Whitworth, Kathy Sullivan, Steven French, Mike Kennedy, and Andrew Porter for some of these stories. Title credit belongs to File 770 contributing editor of the day Dan’l.]




































