Sunday, September 20, 2026
Time to Celebrate the Birthday of Sofia Loren
Friday, September 18, 2026
TRUMP'S SWEEPING DEAL BEWEEN USA AND DENMARK OVER GREENLAND (For Years, My Danish Articles on Trump's Viewpoint and Strategy Were Rejected by Editors All Over Denmark)
![]() |
| Exclusive for the readers of this blog: A member of the Danish army's special forces, the Jægerkorps |
A breaking report about President Donald Trump's historic agreement with Copenhagen over Greenland from Berlingske Tidende and Fox News (which calls it, tongue in cheek, a "Green new deal").
President Donald Trump struck a sweeping agreement with Denmark and Greenland this week granting the United States permanent military rights on the strategically placed Arctic island.
The U.S. will now have permanent access, basing and overflight rights in Greenland, and the ability to establish additional military installations as needed, according to a senior U.S. official who outlined the deal exclusively to Fox News Digital.
The deal bars China, Russia and other non-NATO countries from establishing military bases or maintaining troops in Greenland. It also restricts adversaries from investing in sensitive sectors that could pose a threat to U.S. national security.
You want to know why @realDonaldTrump is focused on Greenland? He’s always one step ahead.
The United States is quietly negotiating with Denmark to gain access to three additional defense areas in Greenland – in addition to Pituffik Space Base, the former Thule Air Base in northern Greenland.This was stated by General Gregory Guillot, commander of the United States Northern Command – which includes the American military installations and forces in North America and the Arctic, including Greenland – during a Senate hearing in Washington
As a fluent Danish speaker, I have been trying to present these (undeniable) facts to the Danish public for years. With no success whatsoever.• Bombshell Revelation! Lexington Institute Explains the Exact Event Which Caused Trump 45 to Want to Acquire Greenland; ADDENDUM: Here Is What Is Wrong with Greenland's Status Quo
• NOT SO DELUSIONAL — The Donroe Doctrine and Beijing's "Polar Silk Road": Last Month, a Report by None Other than Danish Intelligence Itself Warned About the Russian and Chinese Threat to Greenland and the Arctic
USA er med stilfærdige forhandlinger med Danmark godt i gang med at få adgang til yderligere tre forsvarsområder i Grønland – ud over Pituffik Space Base, den tidligere Thule Air Base i Nordgrønland.
Det fortalte general Gregory Guillot, øverstkommanderende for United States Northern Command – der omfatter de amerikanske militære installationer og styrker i Nordamerika og Arktis, herunder Grønland – under en senatshøring i Washington torsdag den 19. marts.
Berlingske Tidende today:
Trump annoncerer aftale mellem USA, Danmark og Grønland
Den amerikanske præsident, Donald Trump, annoncerer i et opslag på Truth Social, at USA, Danmark og Grønland har indgået en aftale.
Aftalen forlyder, at USA får permanent kontrol over sikkerheden og »alle andre behov« i Grønland, skriver præsidenten:
»et vil IKKE medføre nogen omkostninger for USA! På min foranledning har vi samarbejdet med repræsentanter for Danmark og Grønland for at sikre, at USA FOR EVIGT vil have fuldstændig beføjelse til at gøre det, der er nødvendigt i Grønland for at sikre og forsvare sikkerheden i både Grønland og USA.«
Donald Trump skriver videre, at »ingen af USAs modstandere« fremover nogensinde vil have en base, militær tilstedeværelse eller foretage følsomme investeringer i Grønland uden USAs skriftlige godkendelse:
»I over 100 år har præsidenterne været klar over Grønlands strategiske betydning, men INGEN af dem var i stand til at gøre noget ved det,« lyder det fra Trump …
Michael Desronvil Identified: The Holdout Juror Faced with Vitriol Steps Forth
Reporting for the Daily Mail, MELISSA KOENIG and WILL POTTER share the revelation of the identity of the holdout juror in the Lindsasy Clancy trial, as he has come forward to defend himself.
The holdout juror who refused to acquit Lindsay Clancy has told of how he held firm as the other 11 tried to convince him to find her not guilty by reason of insanity of strangling her three children.
The juror, whom NewsNation identified as Michael P Desronvil, told the outlet he 'didn't have any doubts' - refuting jury foreperson Roni Carlson's earlier remarks.
He said: 'As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberations, I kept getting cut off as I had doubts based on the evidence present.'
The juror explained to the network that based on all the evidence he ‘thought it was enough proof that she [Clancy] knew exactly what she was doing and planned' to kill her three children – Cora, five, Dawson, three, and eight-month-old Callan.
He also shared his thoughts about the high-profile case in an interview with Ray Marcel of Fugitive TV, saying he was convinced Clancy 'knew right from wrong'.
… The holdout juror also said he had been stunned by the vitriol he faced after he voted to convict Clancy, and felt the backlash from his fellow jurors was because he was a 'black Republican,' Marcel claimed.
But wait! The story keeps getting better. (Or worse!) You can't make this up: It's not enough that he was facing vitriol for being a "black Republican" (the horror! the horror!), it turns out that the previous accusations of domestic violence seem to have been lies made by a wife (i.e., his own spouse) who wanted to retaliate against him after he found out to his great surprise she was an… illegal alien! (In the AWFULs' minds, probably Mrs. Desronvil should also be forgiven for her lies and her deceit in addition to her fake accusations.)
He said Desronvil told him the allegations stemmed from a turbulent 'fraudulent marriage,' and their relationship rapidly deteriorated when he allegedly discovered she was an illegal immigrant.
'He didn't know that, and he told me that's pretty much when everything hit the fan,' Marcel said on his YouTube show.
He said Desronvil told him that his former partner raised domestic violence allegations in retaliation after he filed for divorce.
Related: • The Only Good Woman Is a Leftist Woman and the only good "Negro" is a leftist "Negro"
Speaking of "Black Republicans", Abraham Lincoln held a speech in February 1860 (indeed, his Cooper Union speech
galvanized the Republicans to eventually choose him as their candidate)
in which he told his audience how he would address himself to them as
if they were composed of Southerners and Democrats:
… when you speak of us Republicans, you do so only to denounce us as reptiles, or, at the best, as no better than outlaws. You will grant a hearing to pirates or murderers, but nothing like it to [Republicans]. In all your contentions with one another, each of you deems an unconditional condemnation of [Republicanism] as the first thing to be attended to. Indeed, such condemnation of us seems to be an indispensable prerequisite — license, so to speak — among you to be admitted or permitted to speak at all. Now, can you, or not, be prevailed upon to pause and to consider whether this is quite just to us, or even to yourselves? Bring forward your charges and specifications, and then be patient long enough to hear us deny or justify.
Wednesday, September 16, 2026
"Muslims have finally cracked the code on the West"; For Islam, "Socialism Is THE Trojan Horse" to power — Larry Taunton's September 11th keynote address
Secularism is no match for Islam. It's why Islam is steamrolling the West. Muslims have finally cracked the code on the West. They have learned that Islam doesn't sell well, but socialism does — with the young. And so that has become the Trojan horse to power. I promise you, Ilhan Omar cares nothing for the equal distribution of wealth. She's a Jihadist. The [mayor] of New York cares nothing for that either. It is a path to power. And the same is true for the mayor of London, the same is true for the mayors of dozens of towns in the UK. The same is true for what is happening in places like Dearborn, Minneapolis, and so forth. They have recognized that socialism is the Trojan horse. And they are using ir.
— Larry Alex Taunton in his September 11th keynote address
In the same perspective (shookhran to Sarah for the Instalink), do also check out Ayaan Hirsi Ali's comments on The Lie About Islam, Europe, and the Dangers We Face.
As promised, my September 11th keynote address recounting my experiences at Ground Zero and with Islam. It’s bare-knuckled.
— Larry Alex Taunton (@LarryTaunton) September 15, 2026
Monday, September 14, 2026
SUNDAY'S SUPER-CLOSE ELECTION — "Open borders stopped the right from winning": "This could be the first election where the Muslim immigration community decides the outcome"
"This could be the first election in Sweden", declared the rightist party leader Jimmie Åkesson, "where the Muslim immigration community decides the outcome."
The results of Sunday's election in Sweden should have been known by that evening, with the right expected to be the winners. Instead, the rightists are in trouble in what is a super-close election, dominated by the left — if only by 0.4% — and with the right and the left tottering between, respectively, 49.1% and 49.5%.
And the reason, according to Berlingske's Peter Suppli Benson, quoting the Sweden Democrats leader, is that "a political wave has hit Sweden," with the migrant community suddenly starting to participate in local and national elections.
"One thing that the Swedish election has made clear" writes Peter Imanuelsen: "Open borders stopped the right from winning."
Does this remind you of similar elections in other countries and states?
Listen, if you can. In Swedish elections, votes of Muslims proved decisive. An imam had predicted this, stating that Sweden has effectively been conquered and that Muslims will soon become majority. This is because, unlike Swedes, they have many children. They had warned us. https://t.co/kpOTWxfHCV
— RadioGenoa (@RadioGenoa) September 14, 2026
As Stephen Green commented on Facebook, quoting Peter Sweden:
EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT OPEN BORDERS*
(*And why the Left loves them.)
70% of people with a non European background voted for the left wing bloc in the Swedish election today according to exit poll by Valu. Now you know why the left supports open borders.
— PeterSweden (@PeterSweden7) September 13, 2026
One thing that the Swedish election has made clear.Open borders stopped the right from winning.People with a non European background overwhelmingly voted left.The left supports open borders because it is a strategic political move to stay in power.
9-11 Documentary: "Inside the Twin Towers"
Just watched an excellent documentary, 9-11: Inside the Twin Towers (thanks to Jack Posobiec). Also billed simply as 9-11: the Twin Towers when it appeared 20 years ago, the 1h26 movie is descibed as
a television special documentary film which uses re-enactments and computer-generated imagery to re-create a minute-by-minute account of what happened inside the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City during the September 11th attacks.
Sunday, September 13, 2026
If someone suggests using a Nazi concentration camp for their opponents, aren't they in fact the actual… Nazis?
Who are really the actual Nazis? While visiting Dachau concentration camp, a leftist made the following remark as she stood, smiling, in front of the crematorium ovens.
North Carolina Democrat state legislative candidate Shelly Headen posted a Facebook story from a vacation showing her in front of ovens in a German concentration camp memorial, saying,
“Visiting Dauchau [sic] Concentration Camp in Germany… This is where Trump supporters belong.”… In social media photos, Headen is seen smiling as she stands in front of what appears to be crematorium ovens, which were used by the Nazi SS to burn the bodies of Jews and other prisoners who died or were murdered at the camp.
Headen faces incumbent Republican state Rep. John Blust in a suburban Guilford County district. On her Facebook page, Headen says she is a CPA and business owner “running to restore human decency,” an ironic statement after saying political opponents should be in concentration camps while posing and smiling in front of ovens at a Holocaust memorial site.
Indeed. Doesn't this raise the question: if someone is a Nazi, or a neo-Nazi, isn't the logical conclusion that it is the ones suggesting using (ahem) a… Nazi concentration camp for their opponents?! Wouldn't they be the prime candidates?! Has it occurred to any leftist that it might be time for an Are we the baddies moment? (Vielen Dank an Ed für den Instalink.)
The rhetoric expressed by Headen is growing among Democrat candidates and left-wing agitators across the nation.
… The apparent call to burn Trump supporters isn’t her only expression of support for violence. In another Facebook post, Headen appears to call for an unspecified terrorist attack against America, writing,
“I think our only hope is an attack on US soil… preferably Alabama, Louisiana… where the stupid people are.”
It transpires that after after inflammatory social media posts she made resurfaced, the Guilford County Democratic Party is withdrawing its support for the statehouse candidate.
Doesn't that seem a bit odd?
Why would they do that?
As I wrote in a post 16 years ago, while Barack Obama was in the White House during his first term (not once during eight years did I call him "President Obama" — similarly with Joe Biden — unless I was quoting another person or media outlet), if Republicans were really as awful and atrocious as regularly depicted, then the only (the final?) solution is that they needed to be submitted to some serious reeducation in special camps.
As I pointed out back in July 2010, if liberal opinions are
taken to their logical conclusion…
…then Americans should go through some sort of reeducation centers to be made to understand the good they are being bestowed, and to be made to refrain from criticizing (at least, not too much) the Spiritual Guide who is benevolently bestowing them upon us;
…then democracy should be curtailed and elections banned (polls as well, probably), at least temporarily, so that the benevolent Great Helmsman can implement his (benevolent) policies in the absenceof obstacles from clueless idiots— be they common citizens or the unpatriotic naysayers in the opposition;
…in fact, then Barack Obama should be allowed to dictate his (benevolent) policies to the nation (the nation of clueless clods who are preventing him from carrying those dashing avant-garde ideas of his through to completion).
(And liberals, leftists, and statists wonder why, and think we are exaggerating when, some of us issue warnings about socialism and when we warn about it being a path to tyranny?!)
Related: • RIP Charlie Kirk — This Is What Is Bound to Happen When You Constantly Refer to Your Adversaries as "Fascists" and as "Threats to Democracy"
• Charlie Kirk and the Glorification of Terrorism: "broadcast outlets did their best to hide the obvious connection between the shooter and the left’s obsession that everyone on the right is 'fascist'"
Saturday, September 12, 2026
Frenchman Is Certain — and Delighted — that Donald Trump's Final Goal Is the Overthrow of the Tehran Régime
![]() |
| Philippe Karsenty at the 911 commemoration in Paris (glasses, red tie, behind pole) |
Following his interview with the Emet station, a viewer or listener called in to complain that Philippe Karsenty seemed to be becoming either anti-Netanyahu or a raging leftist, if not both. So the station decided to interview the head of the Comité Trump France again, and he assured Emet's Jean-Patrick Grumberg (video) that neither is true.
Beyond that, the main subject of the interview concerned the war in Iran and Donald Trump's strategy, and in that perspective Philippe Karsenty has no doubt that the American president's final goal — even if it cannot be voiced — is the full overthrow of the Tehran régime.
Friday, September 11, 2026
9-11 Ceremony: Paris Remembers
![]() |
| Paris n'oublie pas — Paris does not forget |
![]() |
| Members of Republicans Overseas France (ROF) and friends |
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Charlie Kirk and the Glorification of Terrorism: "broadcast outlets did their best to hide the obvious connection between the shooter and the left’s obsession that everyone on the right is 'fascist' "
One year after his brutal death, Fox News presents a handful of pieces on Charlie Kirk, including the
10 most powerful moments from college campuses to the Republican National Convention (Turning Point USA founder debated Hasan Piker, Bill Maher and Oxford students before his 2025 assassination) — well worth reading and watching — along with a personal testimony from Andrew Kolvet, the executive producer of "The Charlie Kirk Show" and a spokesman for Turning Point USA: I spent eight years beside Charlie Kirk. Here’s what the world never understood (What Charlie’s critics never understood about him was how hard he was willing to work to accomplish what many believed was an impossible goal).
He was also very deliberate. You could tell that Charlie hated wasting time. Without being rude, he wanted to get right into the meat of the discussion, and as we talked, it was impossible not to notice his oversized suit, the dress shoes that seemed more appropriate for a 70-year-old man, or his overall Midwestern disdain for trends.
… And, of course, there were the constant attacks. When I started working with Charlie, conservative media was awash in cheap hit pieces and op-eds attacking him and the organization. He was too abrasive, they said, too confrontational, too aggressive. They called him a charlatan, a grifter, and said TPUSA was all smoke and mirrors.
… What Charlie’s critics never understood about Charlie was how hard he was willing to work to accomplish what many believed was an impossible goal. They never saw the machine he was building brick by brick to turn back a generational tide that was decades in the making. Charlie knew the next crisis, the next challenge and the next hit piece was just around the corner. But he never gave in to despair or "black-pilled" thinking. He was a happy warrior until the end, always willing to work harder than everyone else, to do his part and to honor his word. He did it all with boundless energy, decency, unflinching faith and a belief in the greatness of America.
Meanwhile, Dan Gainor focused on how, In the year since we lost Charlie Kirk, the media has done its best to act its worst:
It has already been a year since conservative icon Charlie Kirk was assassinated and the attack has brought out the worst in some of the worst people in our media and celebrity culture. False claims that the alleged assassin was conservative, false quotes and hateful comments have filled TV, radio and, of course, the internet.
… The left and media moved on quickly from the assassination to the character assassination of the victim. Charlie Kirk was bashed as "hateful," "bigoted," a "hatemonger" and a "prominent Christian nationalist" who "has been known to make racist statements." Even major news outlets fired or suspended some of those who bashed Kirk. But broadcast outlets did their best to hide the obvious connection between the alleged shooter and the left’s obsession that everyone on the right is "fascist."
… Former "Daily Show" host Trevor Noah couldn’t get past how pro-Second Amendment Kirk "was shot while defending guns." He called it, "an incongruous funny thing that happens." "You are there. You're onstage, like, ‘Let me tell you why people should have guns.’ Wa-pow!" That’s the neutral individual who hosted the White House Correspondents' Dinner a couple years ago.
As Philippe Karsenty pointed out within a week of of the assassination of Charlie Kirk regarding the Left's rants, "It has strictly nothing to do with free speech; it is the glorification of terrorism!"

• RIP Charlie Kirk — This Is What Is Bound to Happen When You Constantly Refer to Your Adversaries as "Fascists" and as "Threats to Democracy"
That attack on Charlie's personality that it is allegedly ironic (and therefore fitting) that he "was shot while defending guns" — which might seem offhand to present a modicum of validity — is something that this blog answered in depth last December.
Three irrefutable points were presented in the following post: "Reaping What You Sow"?! Did Charlie Kirk Really Deserve His Fate Due to His "Insensitive" Declarations in Favor of the "Repulsive" 2nd Amendment? (Includes the Full "Controversial" Text & Video).
1) Two Basic Attitudes of Liberals That They Are Totally Oblivious About
2) Mass Shootings That the MSM Never Covers
3) Wouldn't Gun Control, European-Style, End Shootings in the First Place?
Do check all three points out. (Thanks for the Instalink, Ed.)
As I wrote in the introduction to my in-depth (and dispassionate) study on the issue of gun control,
In the 18th century — the century at the end of which the Second Amendment was being passed in the newly-born United States — the biggest problem for the majority of the world's population was not the right to keep and bear arms.
It was the lack of the right to keep and bear arms.
In the 19th century, likewise, the greatest problem for most people on this planet was not the absence of gun control.
It was the presence of gun control.
In the 20th century, most people did not suffer from the right to keep and bear arms.
They suffered from the lack of the right to keep and bear arms.
As can be attested by the victims (assuming they could talk) of the likes of Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Milosevic, along with the Hutus… As an aside, one of the first measures taken by each of the aforementioned (ahem) leaders after coming to power — for the good of the people, needless to say — was to impose or to tighten arms control.
And it is no different today.
Look at Saddam's Iraq, at Khadaffi's Libya, at the Assads' Syria…
(Would not the average Iraqi citizen, the average Libyan citizen, the average Syrian citizen over the past 30 to 40 years have been better off with the right to keep and bear arms?)
Sunday, September 06, 2026
“Do not mess with us” (with Israel), Warns Netanyahu; Israeli Elections on October 27: Is it "time to prepare for the post-Bibi era"?
On Sunday, Prime Minister Netanyahu threatened Iran with 'blow beyond anything it can imagine', vowing to 'complete' the mission.
"We are determined to defend ourselves," Netanyahu continued [during a Rosh Hashanah toast in Jerusalem]. "We are determined to strike our enemies. They are not attacking us. Iran is refraining from doing so, and it knows why.
"Of course, it could make the mistake of attacking us. If it does, it will suffer a blow beyond anything it can even imagine."
Four days earlier, Philippe Karsenty told Jean-Patrick Grumberg on the Emet station that "it is time to prepare for the after-Bibi era." This came in turn three months after predicting that Benjamin Netanyahu will lose the Israeli elections this Fall — and especially that the Trump administration is counting on the fact that Netanyahu will soon be out of a job.
In any case, says the head of the Comité Trump France, Israel's new PM must come from the right, to resist against the pressure of countries such as France and Spain to commit suicide by giving in to Palestinian demands.
Friday, September 04, 2026
"An assault on traditional liberal values from the progressive left": Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt Are Mentioned in the New York Times
Of the half dozen readers in the domestic U.S. edition of the New York Times reacting to “Yes, Woke 1.0 Was Crazy. Now Where’s the Accountability?,” by Bret Stephens (column, Aug. 19), almost all defended woke progressives while trashing Stephens and going berserk over Donald Trump's MAGA movement.
The lone exception — albeit the only letter that was printed in the international edition of the newspaper — was the one that mentioned the president of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). Whoever edited the letters page online was kind enough to link both Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt's Atlantic pages, plus their 2015 article (unless they simply copied the html in the Canadian letter-writer's email).
To the Editor:
Whatever term we wish to apply to this decade of insanity, I share Bret Stephens’s shock and disappointment with the lack of accountability or self-reflection from those who participated in this broad cultural movement.
In their widely read article in The Atlantic in 2015, “The Coddling of the American Mind,” Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt put a spotlight on a key turning point in higher education toward safetyism, which then spread much more widely in society and led to many of the abuses that Mr. Stephens pointed out in his column.
The period was marked by an assault on traditional liberal values from the progressive left. Merit was redefined as privilege. Dedication to universal values was patriarchal. Respect for the dignity of the individual was getting in the way of the revolution.
Traditional liberalism values self-reflection, and this has been largely absent when assessing what happened during this period and its costs.
Mark Wolfgram
Ottawa
Thursday, September 03, 2026
#metoo?! No Pity for a Man Flirting with Women; But for a Female Murderess, We Are Supposed to Show Sympathy?!
No man is supposed to be immune from the grave grave crime — the gravest of sins — of hitting on women (call it flirting or harassment, you takes your pick, although obviously some non-woke people can see a modicum of difference between the two), whether in the workplace or elsewhere.
A woman murders three people — three children at that (her own) — and she is supposed to be excused?! We are supposed to show understanding?!
We're told that our ancestors (female and male alike) were such idiots (eye roll), such bigoted people (deep sigh, headshake) for not seeing that women were equal to men and not allowing women into certain places, not least sitting on a… jury (!) — where in the 2026 Lindsay Clancy trial all nine women, plus two men (two beta males?), wanted to find the confessed killer Not Guilty. And now happily we have made so much progress…
Hasn't it occurred to anybody — get ready! get ready to call me a sexist! — that our ancestors (again, female as well as male) may have been right?
How about other professions? How about women as lawyers? How about women as judges? How about women as lawmakers? How about a woman as the president of the United States?
How about pilots? How about professors? How about teachers?
How about the head of household (in an intact family)? How about a single mother?
Instapundit has lots more; and thanks for the Instalink, Ed…
If you don't affirm your son's trans identity when he is 2 years old, you are an evil mother.
— Gad Saad (@GadSaad) September 3, 2026
If you kill your three children, you deserve our empathy because hormones.
Any questions?
Behind The Scenes, Dolly Parton Quietly Gave Tens Of Millions Of Dollars To Charity
Dolly Parton Was America’s Most Recognizable Country Star by Ella Spitz. Behind The Scenes, She Quietly Gave Tens Of Millions Of Dollars To Charity
Related: • 44 Glamorous Photos Of Dolly Parton; outside Buckingham Palace, King's Guard plays moving tribute; The day Country Music’s Greatest Diva met the Muppet Show's stars
• Dolly and Her Sisters: the Sextet Siblings Sing in Sync (video of the singin' sistren)
Sunday, August 30, 2026
Dolly and Her Sisters: the Sextet Siblings Sing in Sync
Until her death, I had no idea that Dolly Parton had that many siblings (6 boys, 6 girls with her, 12 in all). So I wanted to see if the girls were as cute as she is/was, and googled "Dolly Parton sisters". I came up with a bunch of photos — and yes, all of 'em are truly lookers — plus Jessica Leigh Mattern and Maggie Horton's Country Living article. And this Christmas song sung by her and her (Hairspray-Heavy) sisters (is there an equivalent of "brethren" for sisters? Update: thanks to LivingFossil in the comments section, the word is Sistren).
See also the hommage from RTBF (in French) : Dolly Parton, l’Amérique réconciliée



























