Buy New
$35.26$35.26
FREE delivery Friday, September 25
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Willows Book Store
Used - Very Good
$7.49$7.49
FREE delivery September 28 - 30
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Phoenix Sold by: ThriftBooks-Phoenix
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Logic of Provability (Volume 0)
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-100521483255
- ISBN-13978-0521483254
- EditionRevised ed.
- PublisherCambridge University Press
- Publication dateAugust 21, 2008
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 0.79 x 9 inches
- Print length316 pages
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customers also bought or read
- An Introduction to Proof Theory: Normalization, Cut-Elimination, and Consistency Proofs
Paperback$42.99$42.99FREE delivery Oct 12 - 16
Editorial Reviews
Review
"I found it lively, lucid, and informative...Boolos' style of writing is unusually kind to the reader. When an argument becomes tricky, he breaks it down into a lot of small steps, showing the reader in detail just how to proceed. A result is that the book is remarkably easy to read." Vann McGee, Rutgers University
Book Description
From the Back Cover
Product details
- Publisher : Cambridge University Press
- Publication date : August 21, 2008
- Edition : Revised ed.
- Language : English
- Print length : 316 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0521483255
- ISBN-13 : 978-0521483254
- Item Weight : 15.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.79 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,668,215 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #391 in Logic (Books)
- #1,371 in Philosophy of Logic & Language
- #16,483 in Mathematics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star78%22%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star78%22%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star78%22%0%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
- 5 out of 5 stars
Lucid introduction and valuable reference
Reviewed in the United States on September 26, 2004As the other reviewers note, this book is remarkable in that it both offers a reasonably gentle introduction to the subject even for those without too much mathematical background (logically-inclined philosophy students come to mind), and at the same time remains to this day an indispensable reference for the specialistâ"this for example is the only source where you can find the proofs of Solovay's "other" modal completeness results for transitive models of set theory. George Boolos was (is) famous for, among other things, his gift of didactically brilliant exposition.
There is only one other book on the subjectâ"C.Smory'nski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic", now out-of-print, which provides a nice complement to Boolos with surprisingly small overlap. For an introduction, I would not hesitate to recommend Boolos over Smory'nski.
Since 1993 the "baton" has not completely "fallen out of Boolos' hands"â"the interested reader can follow up on this via e.g. a couple of handbook-chapter expositions, easily found by googling around, that point to current research literature. However, no further textbook-level exposition appears to be forthcoming anytime soon.
As a comment to galloamericanus' review, I would note that Boolos does not restrict his monograph exclusively or even primarily to his own results. The reader gets a fair overview of the research field by 1993 as shaped by many contributors.
11 people found this helpfulSending feedback...Sending feedback...HelpfulThank you for your feedback.Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try againThanks, we'll investigate in the next few days.Sorry, We failed to report this review. Please try againWe'll check if this review meets our community guidelinesOpens in a new tab. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
CancelReport - 5 out of 5 stars
Outstanding, but Difficult
Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2004George Boolos regrettably died too early, at age 56. He was a witty engaging writer, and a brilliant logician. This book,
completed not long before his untimely death, is probably
the high point of his career. The key insight, that modal logic
can be interpreted as a sort of metamathematical algebra,
is Godel's from the 1930s. And a key result is due to Martin
Lob about 50 years ago. But Boolos built a towering edifice
on this slim material. I think that the provability interpretation
of the modal operator is the most philosophically and mathematically satisfying of all, and I hope someone comes
along to pick up the baton that has fallen from Boolos's hand.
18 people found this helpfulSending feedback...Sending feedback...HelpfulThank you for your feedback.Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try againThanks, we'll investigate in the next few days.Sorry, We failed to report this review. Please try againWe'll check if this review meets our community guidelinesOpens in a new tab. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
CancelReport
Top reviews from other countries
ryotarounosuke4 out of 5 stars第二不完全性定理の部分だけでも貴重。
Reviewed in Japan on November 22, 2003この本のはじめの方で、多くの本では「これらの議論を形式化すれば、~が出てきて、第二不完全先生定理が帰結する」というようになっている部分を、丁寧に追っている。可証性述語と様相論理の関係というのがこの本の一番のテーマであるから、こうした一部だけを取り上げてレビューするのは適当ではないかもしれないが、この点だけでも貴重な一冊なので挙げてみた。田中一之さんの本でも可導性性条件の証明は多少書いてあるが、やはりある程度丁寧に追った本を探していたので、この本はぴったりだった。特に、不完全性定理の議論を初めから形式化する方法が載っている本は少ない(と思う)のでかなり貴重。このやり方だと、第一不完全性定理を証明するのが通常より大変になるが、その代わり第二不完全性定理が自然に出てくる。ただし、Boolosは(論文でもその傾向があるように思われるが)本の書き方として、それほど分りやすくない点があり、それで四つ星にした。
Sending feedback...Thanks, we'll investigate in the next few days.Sorry, We failed to report this review. Please try againWe'll check if this review meets our community guidelinesOpens in a new tab. If it doesn't, we'll remove it.
CancelReport









