Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-z9l2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-08T15:09:24.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration: Creating a New Theoretical Framework for Understanding Involuntary Property Loss and the Remedies Required

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Bernadette Atuahene
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program, I introduced the concept of “dignity takings,” which I defined as property confiscation that involves the dehumanization or infantilization of the dispossessed. I argued that the appropriate remedy for a dignity taking is “dignity restoration”: material compensation to dispossessed populations through processes that affirm their humanity and reinforce their agency. For this symposium, contributors were invited to examine these paired concepts through case studies beyond the South African context. This introductory essay summarizes the central arguments of We Want What's Ours and considers how the symposium contributions confirm, extend, or revise the concepts of dignity takings and dignity restoration.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , Fall 2016 , pp. 796 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Acevedo, John F. 2016. “Restoring Community Dignity Following Policy Misconduct.” Howard Law Journal 59:621–49.Google Scholar
Acevedo, John F. In press. “Dignity Takings in the Criminal Law of Seventeenth‐Century England and the Massachusetts Bay Colony.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Albert, Craig Douglas. In press. “No Place to Call Home: The Iraqi Kurds Under Arabization, Saddam Hussein, and ISIS.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2011. “Paying for the Past: Addressing Past Property Violations in South Africa.” Law & Society Review 45:955–89.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014a. We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014b. “The Importance of Conversation in Transitional Justice: A Study of Land Restitution in South Africa.” Law & Social Inquiry 39 (4): 902–37.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2016. “Takings as a Sociolegal Concept: An Interdisciplinary Examination of Involuntary Property Loss.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 171–97.Google Scholar
Bachar, Gilat. In press. “Access Denied—Using Procedure to Restrict Tort Litigation: Lessons from the Israeli‐Palestinian Experience.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Blume, Lawrence, and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. 1984. “Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis.” California Law Review 72 (4): 569–628.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1999. “Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts.” Crime and Justice 25 (1): 1–127.Google Scholar
Brophy, Alfred L. 2016. “When More than Property Is Lost: The Dignitary Losses and Gains in the Tulsa Riot of 1921.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 824–32.Google Scholar
Dana, David, and Merrill, W. Thomas. 2002. Takings. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen, and Lyle, Timothy. In press. “Fucking with Dignity: Public Sex, Queer Intimate Kinship, and how the AIDS Epidemic Bathhouse Closures Constituted a Dignity Taking.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard Allen. 1985. Takings Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fischel, William. 1995. Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics, and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fullilove, Mindy Thompson. 2004. Root Shock: How Tearing Up City Neighborhoods Hurts America, and What We Can Do About It. New York: One World/Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Guzmán‐Rodríguez, Diana. In press. “Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration: A Case Study of the Colombian Land Restitution Program.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 2016. “Coverture and Dignity: A Comment.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 833–40.Google Scholar
Henderson, Taja‐Nia. In press. “Dignity Takings and Dignity Restoration Examined Through the Lens of American Chattel Slavery.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Hulsebosch, Daniel J. 2016. “Exile, Choice, and Loyalism: Taking and Restoring Dignity in the American Revolution.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 841–65.Google Scholar
Joo, Thomas. In press. “Alien, Land, Law: Urban Renewal and Sacramento's Lost Japantown.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Kahrl, Andrew. In press. “Unconscionable: Tax Delinquency Sales as a Form of Dignity Taking.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Joshua. In press. “Making the Underclass: Deprivation, Degradation, and America's Hidden Penal Regime.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1785] 1998. The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Gregor, Mary J. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kedar, Alexandre. 2016. “Dignity Takings and Dispossession in Israel.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 866–87.Google Scholar
Kelly, Daniel B. 2006. “The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain Law: A Rationale Based on Secret Purchases and Private Influence.” Cornell Law Review 92 (1): 1–65.Google Scholar
Leckie, Scott. 2000. “Housing and Property Issues for Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons in the Context of Return: Key Considerations for UNHCR Policy and Practice.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 19 (3): 5–63.Google Scholar
Locke, John. [1690] 1980. Two Treatise of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1967. “Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compensation’ Law.” Harvard Law Review 80: 1165–1258.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1997. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nadas, Rachel, and Rathod, Jayesh. In press. “Damaged Bodies, Damaged Lives: Immigrant Worker Injuries as Dignity Takings.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011. Law's Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ossei‐Owusu, Shaun. In press. “The Good State Giveth and Taketh Away: Race, Class, and Urban Hospital Closings.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Victoria F. In press. “Beyond Trademark: The Washington Redskins Case and the Search for Dignity.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Pils, Eva. 2016. “Resisting Dignity Takings in China.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 888–916.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin B. 2016. “Dignity as (Self‐)Determination: Hopi Sovereignty in the Face of US Dispossessions.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 917–38.Google Scholar
Rosado Marzán, Cesar. In press. “Dignity Takings and ‘Wage Theft.’” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 2000. “Property and Expropriation: Themes and Variations in American Law.” Utah Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 2016. “Racially Restrictive Covenants—Were They Dignity Takings?.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 939–55.Google Scholar
Serkin, Christopher. 2005. “The Meaning of Value: Assessing Just Compensation for Regulatory Takings.” Northwestern University Law Review 99:677–742.Google Scholar
Shaw, Matthew Patrick. In press. “Creating the Urban Educational Desert Through School Closures and Dignity Taking.” Chicago‐Kent Law Review 92 (3).Google Scholar
United Nations. 1996. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. UN Document A/51/18.Google Scholar
Van der Walt, Andre J. 1998. The Constitutional Property Clause. Cape Town: Juta; Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Van der Westhuizen, Christi. 2007. White Power & the Rise and Fall of the National Party. Cape Town: Zebra Press.Google Scholar
Veraart, Wouter. 2016. “Two Rounds of Postwar Restitution and Dignity Restoration in the Netherlands and France.” Law & Social Inquiry 41 (4): 956–72.Google Scholar
Woolford, Andrew, and Wolejszo, Stefan. 2006. “Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos.” Law & Society Review 40 (4): 871–902.Google Scholar
Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823).Google Scholar
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).Google Scholar
Land Restitution Act, South Africa (1994).Google Scholar
South African Constitution (1996).Google Scholar
Johnson v. M'Intosh, 21 U.S. 543 (1823).Google Scholar
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).Google Scholar
Land Restitution Act, South Africa (1994).Google Scholar
South African Constitution (1996).Google Scholar