Skip to main content
Log in

Interpretation of homophones related to threat: Anxiety or response bias effects?

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three studies investigated the relationship between anxiety, social desirability, and an interpretative bias favoring, threat in nonclinical subjects. Interpretative bias was assessed with Mathews, Richards, and Eysenck's (1989) homophone task. In Study 1, and tendency to produce threatening interpretations of ambiguous words was associated with lower social desirability, rather than anxiety. In Study 2, the interpretative bias measure correlated with trait anxiety, but not with social desirability. In Study 3, trait anxiety and social desirability had independent effects on interpretative bias, which were different in the first and second halves of the homophone task. The predicted effect of trait anxiety was only apparent in the first half of the task. Possible reasons for the discrepant results, and the importance of assessing the influence of social desirability on cognitive bias measures, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K. & Williams, R. (1994a).Implicit and explicit memory bias in anxiety and depression. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Williams, R. (1994b). Implicit and explicit memory for emotional information in non-clinical subjects.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 65–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety.Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., Salkovskis, P. M., Gelder, M., Koehler, C., Martin, M., Anastasiades, P., Hackman, A., Middleton, H., & Jeavons, A. (1988). Tests of a cognitive theory of panic. In I. Hand, & H. Wittchen (Eds.),Panic and phobias 2: Treatments and variables affecting course and outcome. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1987). Cognitive functioning and anxiety.Psychological Research, 149, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Mogg, K., May, J., Richards, A., & Mathews, A. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C., & Rutherford, E. M. (1992). Anxiety and the selective processing of emotional information: Mediating roles of awarencess, trait and state variables, and personal relevance of stimulus materials.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 30, 479–491.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, D., & Crowne, D. P. (1961). Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 25, 109–115.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A., Richards, A., & Eysenck, M. (1989). Interpretation of homophones related to threat in anxiety states.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 98, 31–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J., & Foa, E. B. (1987). Cognition and agoraphobia: Bias in the interpretation of threat.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1968).Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogg, K., Bradley, B., & Williams, R. (in press).Attentional bias in anxiety and depression: The role of awareness. British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

  • Mogg, K., Mathews, A., Bird, C., & Macgregor-Morris, R. (1990). Effects of stress and anxiety on the processing of threat stimuli.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1230–1237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W., & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood-incongruent recall.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A., & Whittaker, T. M. (1990). Effects of anxiety and mood manipulation in autobiographical memory.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 145–153.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacogs, G. A. (1983)Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoler, L. S., & McNally, R. J. (1991). Cognitive bias in symptomatic and recovered agoraphobics.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 539–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983).Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, D. A., Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369–380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by the Wellcome Trust and Pinsent Darwin Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mogg, K., Bradley, B.P., Miller, T. et al. Interpretation of homophones related to threat: Anxiety or response bias effects?. Cogn Ther Res 18, 461–477 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357754

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357754

Key Words