Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 13;7(4):e06660.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06660. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Gendered stereotypes and norms: A systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour

Affiliations
Review

Gendered stereotypes and norms: A systematic review of interventions designed to shift attitudes and behaviour

Rebecca Stewart et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

In the face of ongoing attempts to achieve gender equality, there is increasing focus on the need to address outdated and detrimental gendered stereotypes and norms, to support societal and cultural change through individual attitudinal and behaviour change. This article systematically reviews interventions aiming to address gendered stereotypes and norms across several outcomes of gender inequality such as violence against women and sexual and reproductive health, to draw out common theory and practice and identify success factors. Three databases were searched; ProQuest Central, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Articles were included if they used established public health interventions types (direct participation programs, community mobilisation or strengthening, organisational or workforce development, communications, social marketing and social media, advocacy, legislative or policy reform) to shift attitudes and/or behaviour in relation to rigid gender stereotypes and norms. A total of 71 studies were included addressing norms and/or stereotypes across a range of intervention types and gender inequality outcomes, 55 of which reported statistically significant or mixed outcomes. The implicit theory of change in most studies was to change participants' attitudes by increasing their knowledge/awareness of gendered stereotypes or norms. Five additional strategies were identified that appear to strengthen intervention impact; peer engagement, addressing multiple levels of the ecological framework, developing agents of change, modelling/role models and co-design of interventions with participants or target populations. Consideration of cohort sex, length of intervention (multi-session vs single-session) and need for follow up data collection were all identified as factors influencing success. When it comes to engaging men and boys in particular, interventions with greater success include interactive learning, co-design and peer leadership. Several recommendations are made for program design, including that practitioners need to be cognisant of breaking down stereotypes amongst men (not just between genders) and the avoidance of reinforcing outdated stereotypes and norms inadvertently.

Keywords: Attitude change; Behaviour change; Gender; Men and masculinities; Social norms; Stereotypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram of screening and study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breakdown of study characteristics and strategies associated with achieving intended outcomes.

References

    1. Kågesten A., Chandra-Mouli V. Gender-transformative programmes: implications for research and action. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8(2):e159–e160. - PubMed
    1. Levy J.K., Darmstadt G.L., Ashby C., Quandt M., Halsey E., Nagar A. Characteristics of successful programmes targeting gender inequality and restrictive gender norms for the health and wellbeing of children, adolescents, and young adults: a systematic review. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8(2):e225–e236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Nations Goal 5: achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls [Internet]. [Place unknown]: United Nations; [date unknown] [date updated unknown; cited 2020 May 5] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ Available from.
    1. Pulerwitz J., Gottert A., Betron M., Shattuck D. Jan 2020. Do’s and Don’ts for Engaging Men & Boys [Internet]. [Place Unknown]: USAID Interagency Gender Working Group (IGWG) p. 2.https://www.igwg.org/resources/dos-donts-for-engaging-men-boys/ [cited 2020 May 5] Available from.
    1. Barker G., Ricardo C., Nascimento M. World Health Organization, Institutional Repository for Information Sharing; Geneva: 2007. Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-Based Inequity in Health: Evidence from Programme Interventions; p. 76.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43679 [Internet] [cited 2020 May 5] Available from.

LinkOut - more resources