[dogledogle]

🤔 这个变动的性质是？

• 🐞 Bug 修复

🔗 相关 Issue

N/A

💡 需求背景和解决方案

在 ConfigProvider direction="rtl" 下，Image.PreviewGroup 的预览切换按钮仍使用 LTR 方向图标，导致按钮位置与箭头方向表达不一致。

修复预览配置，使其使用根据当前 direction 计算得到的 RTL 图标，确保预览配置与组件实际传入的图标保持一致。

（实测 X 平台使用 RTL 语言，查看多张图片时，左边按钮是←箭头，功能是“下一张”，右边按钮是右箭头，功能是“上一张”）。

📝 更新日志

语言	更新描述
🇺🇸 英文	Fix Image PreviewGroup switch icons in RTL direction.
🇨🇳 中文	修复 Image PreviewGroup 在 RTL 方向下切换按钮图标错误的问题。

[bolt-new-by-stackblitz]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

[github-actions]

👁 Visual Regression Report for PR #59145 Passed ✅

🎯 Target branch: master (1cb3762)
📖 View Full Report ↗︎
📖 Alternative Report ↗︎

🎊 Congrats! No visual-regression diff found.

📖 中文报告

👁 PR #59145 视觉回归报告 通过 ✅

🎯 目标分支: master (1cb3762)

🎊 恭喜!未发现视觉回归差异。

[github-actions]

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8464eaa5-9034-4ad2-96bf-ea95f1fff335

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cb3762 and 89f0027.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• components/image/PreviewGroup.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 9 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • 修复从右到左（RTL）布局下图片预览导航图标方向不正确的问题。
  • 图片预览功能现在会正确显示适配当前阅读方向的左右导航图标。

Walkthrough

Changes

RTL 预览图标

Layer / File(s)	Summary
合并方向感知图标配置 components/image/PreviewGroup.tsx	InternalPreviewGroup 将 memoizedIcons 传递给 useMergedPreviewConfig。RTL 模式下，合并配置使用已交换 left 和 right 的图标。

Estimated code review effort: 1 (简单) | ~5 分钟

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 89f00

This localized change corrects navigation icons for right-to-left image previews without affecting data, permissions, integrations, or deployment behavior; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains after normal checks and review.

Poem

小兔看见图标转向，
RTL 路径清晰明亮。
左右交换不再迷路，
配置合并步伐稳当。
预览窗口轻轻发光。

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题准确概括了主要变更：修复 Image.PreviewGroup 在 RTL 模式下使用错误图标的问题。
Description check	✅ Passed	描述与变更内容一致。它说明了 RTL 图标问题、修复方案和影响范围。

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1 files.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Bundle Report

Changes will decrease total bundle size by 2 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅

Detailed changes

Bundle name	Size	Change
antd.min-array-push	3.22MB	-2 bytes (-0.0%) ⬇️

Affected Assets, Files, and Routes:

view changes for bundle: antd.min-array-push

Assets Changed:

Asset Name	Size Change	Total Size	Change (%)
antd-with-locales.min.js	-1 bytes	1.79MB	-0.0%
antd.min.js	-1 bytes	1.43MB	-0.0%

[pkg-pr-new]

More templates

• farm-normal
• rsbuild-normal
• umi-normal
• vite-normal
• vite-practice
• with-nextjs-app-router-inline-style
• with-nextjs-extract-style
• with-nextjs-generate-css-on-demand
• with-nextjs-inline-style

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/antd@59145

commit: 89f0027

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (1cb3762) to head (89f0027).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master    #59145   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          834       834           
  Lines        15995     15995           
  Branches      4205      4205           
=========================================
  Hits         15995     15995           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.