Weekend link dump for September 20

“Remember when selling out was considered embarrassing? Remember when the idea of celebrities shilling for big corporations was so heavily mocked that A-Listers had to flee to Japan to do those ads in semi-secret? Now, getting your bag is the in thing, even if you’re already obscenely rich, and what better way to line your already-bulging pockets than by partnering up with prediction markets? Because plain old sports gambling isn’t ethically corrosive enough!” Personally, I agree with The Sports Gossip Show: Shilling for prediction markets is the new cigarette ad. It deserves the same level of disapproval.

“The present situation is a bit like if instead of having a Manhattan Project we just subcontracted it out to a few private companies and set up a prize of a trillion dollars for who could build a nuke first without any safety rules and with a general agreement that no one in the government was allowed to see what any of these guys were doing, what safety precautions they were taking or anything else … because they’re private businesses. It can’t be the way. But at the moment it does seem to be the way.”

“But we are not obliged to share food with a hungry stranger when we are the hungry stranger. We are not obliged to share food when we do not have any food. This woman has no moral obligation to do what Elijah requests of her. She has just barely enough food to feed her own starving son one final meal and taking that food from her son to give it to this weird, greedy stranger is not a duty or a commandment or an expectation.”

“But the overall medical consensus, researchers say, is that postpartum psychosis is treatable when diagnosed early, and that outcomes as severe as Clancy’s are incredibly rare. They hope the trial, which has spurred frank conversations online among mothers about the complexities of postpartum mood and anxiety disorders, can also lead to productive conversations between patients and doctors — instead of panic.”

“We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.”

Good Lord, Brendan Carr is a whiny little bitch.

“Since last year, judges have ruled that the Trump administration has deported more than 170 people in in violation of court orders, in defiance of legally mandated due process protections, or to countries from which they had sought or received protection from torture and persecution.” And I want everyone involved in any aspect of those to be prosecuted at the first opportunity.

“In effect, a threat to make Canada the 51st state is pushing America’s northern neighbor so close to Europe that leaders have begun to half-in-jest dub it the EU’s newest member.”

RIP, Bob Mackie, legendary fashion designer for Cher, Diana Ross, Carol Burnett, and others.

“Given the Trump administration’s emphasis on this plan as a boon for stay-at-home mothers, you may wonder if the single moms presently in the workforce could use childcare funds to pay themselves to stay home. The answer is no. If the new policy is implemented, the payment would apply solely to married stay-at-home moms. The single mothers who rely now on the childcare subsidies would have to keep working (i.e., meet the current requirement to get the subsidy) or marry a gainfully employed man. (If only they had thought of that!) Parents who are unmarried by cohabitating also wouldn’t qualify for the stay-at-home benefit. Married mothers, though, could collect a government payment to stay home, so long as their husbands work full time and for pay.”

“For the first time, scientists believe they may have detected a dark matter particle.”

“States Already Have a Good Way to Ensure Election Integrity—and MAGA Hates It”. (Spoiler alert: it’s ERIC, which Texas among many other red states decided to opt out of, for no good reason.)

“It turns out Jean-Luc Picard was an even better starship helmsman than the writers knew. A physicist has gone through the details of a warp-speed trick from the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation and found a subtlety the show missed. But instead of a plot hole, the detail he found actually makes the maneuver more impressive… as well as a great opportunity to teach about a lesser-known feature of the theory of relativity.”

“Investigators may have broken state laws under the direction of top Homeland Security leaders as part of an expansive effort to find noncitizens on the nation’s voter rolls, according to a federal whistle-blower’s account released on Monday.” Lock them up.

“That most basic of commands has been abandoned in this DOJ. It has become disposable the moment it collides with Trump’s political preferences. And when diGenova, a partisan of the first order, hit the point where he was being told to indict without the basic goods, he balked. Reading between the lines of a resignation, his exit is a quiet, devastating verdict on Todd Blanche’s tenure and the Department he now runs.”

“I got all of these emails in the past three hours. I’m being hustled by clankers. But what’s worse, to be clear: I am a freelancer. These bots are trying to take work from me when I need the work. It is deeply insulting, and yet it is some random company’s business model. WTF?”

“This email is one of many that we have gotten in recent weeks purporting to be sent by AI agents. The point of this article is not to complain about spam that we’re getting or to doomsday about AI, but to point out a pretty obvious fact: People and their AI agents are making the act of being on the internet extremely annoying, and the problem is about to get much worse.”

“Ed Sheeran’s international tour has been thrown into crisis, with one opening act, the rapper Macklemore, dropped from the tour’s US dates for his onstage support of Palestine, and all of the British singer’s other openers quitting to protest the removal.” Robert Kraft, owner of the New England Patriots, is the root cause here.

“So, in the end, I’m actually pretty okay with the situation as far as increased student life spending in Academia. Increases in the standards for room and board, in high-touch services, and in support for student activities are for the most part rational responses to changes in the overall environment.”

“When Trump reaches for the H-word, two things are usually happening: He’s facing a controversy threatening his political or personal priorities, and he’s lost control of the politics.”

“This is the point in this ugly episode where figures on the right, Fox’s Laura Ingraham and Tomi Lahren and Outkick founder Clay Travis, among others, raised an objection. Not to the aping of violence, not to Rowe’s colleagues finding pantomimed violence against her to be hilarious, not to Sarkisian never addressing the controversy himself. They found a way to fault Rowe for supposedly being thin-skinned.”

“Nonetheless, it’s yet another reminder that, no matter how they might look on television or from the third deck of the ballpark, professional athletes compete at a level that we can barely even fathom.”

RIP, Jon Kyl, former Republican Senator from Arizona.

RIP, Duncan Sheik, singer-songwriter who had a hit with “Barely Breathing” and wrote the score for the Broadway musical Spring Awakening.

RIP, Sunny, Obama family dog.

“If you are taking Kash Patel at face value and believing him when he says that all they did was change the rules so that somebody who was sex trafficked by wolves is not automatically disqualified from consideration, let’s have you take a look in the mirror and ask yourself if that is even reasonable. Ask yourself if you really think the FBI was automatically disqualifying people who had some terrible incident in their past where they, against their will, did something with an animal, and that Kash Patel has now solved that problem.”

“Nazi, white supremacist, white nationalist: Whichever term you prefer, it’s undeniable that this category of person is no longer a societal fringe, but an active presence in American society promoted and rewarded by one of the two main political parties. Republicans have embraced Nazi ideology from the White House to the Florida State House, and it’s difficult to track all of the recent instances of Nazism infiltrating mainstream politics. This is my attempt at capturing them.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 1 Comment

Emerson College: Talarico 47, Paxton 46

This is what a “bad” poll for James Talarico looks like these days.

Rep. James Talarico

The September Emerson College Polling/Nexstar Media Texas poll finds 47% of voters support Democrat James Talarico and 46% support Republican Ken Paxton. Four percent are undecided, and 2% support Libertarian Ted Brown. Since August, there has been no significant movement: Talarico gained a point while Paxton lost a point.

“Texas Hispanic voters, who broke for Trump in 2024, now break for Talarico by 15 points, 54% to 39%,” Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling, said. “These voters disapprove of the president 53% to 41%, and 51% think the state is on the wrong track rather than the right direction.”

In the race for Governor, 49% support incumbent Republican Greg Abbott, while 46% support Democrat Gina Hinojosa. Four percent are undecided, and 2% support Libertarian Pat Dixon. Since August, Abbott’s support held at 49% while Hinojosa’s support increased one point, from 45% to 46%.

Talarico holds a 48% favorable rating and 42% unfavorable, while 40% have a favorable view of Ken Paxton and 48% unfavorable.

Governor Abbott’s name recognition is split: 46% have a favorable view of the governor, while 47% have an unfavorable view. Forty-two percent have a favorable view of Democratic challenger Gina Hinojosa, while 32% have an unfavorable view.

Likely voters have heard a lot (45%) or a little (45%) about the September Republican National Committee midterm convention, while 10% report not hearing about it at all. Of those who heard about the RNC midterm convention, 51% said it made them more excited to vote in November, 47% said it made no impact on their vote, and 2% said it made them less excited to vote.

“Notably, majorities of both Republicans (59%) and Democrats (53%) say the convention made them more excited to vote this November, while 68% of independents say it made no impact on their vote,” Kimball noted.

Emerson was the last pollster to show Paxton with the lead, of one point, a month ago. The last non-Emerson pollsters to do that were SoCal Strategies and the UT/Texas Politics Project, both back in June, and both also by a point. More recently, they had Talarico up by five and three, respectively. Siena, partnering with the NYT, had a tie at the end of June; more recently, partnered with ReconMR, they have Talarico up by six, with Gina Hinojosa and Vikki Goodwin also leading. I think we can all see the trend there.

Full data including crosstabs is here. Other items of interest include the levels of Latino support for the Dems – this one comes in lower than some other polls – and the relatively narrow spread between Talarico and Hinojosa. I should try to tally those up and see what the numbers so far tell me. I’ll get back to you on that.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What grade would you give Mike Morath?

Probably not as good as the grade he’d give himself.

Mike Morath set a goal 10 years ago to make Texas No. 1 in education, declaring then that “the future of the state is delivering great results for brown and Black kids while ensuring great results for everybody.”

A decade later, national test scores indicate he still has a steep road to travel before the pizza party. While Texas’ fourth grade math students jumped from 18th to 8th over his tenure, the state otherwise lingers in the bottom third of the country.

However, no one can convince the “proven education reformer” that his body of work has not improved children’s lives.

“Everywhere that I have had direct governance oversight for student learning,” Morath said on a recent summer Thursday, “student learning has increased.”

Morath’s confidence has powered his rise to becoming the second-longest-serving education chief in Texas history. It informs how the former software developer gains trust from Gov. Greg Abbott, who appointed him, and top Republican lawmakers. The perception that he knows best, despite only six months of part-time classroom experience, also explains why his plans at times falter among public school advocates, administrators and teachers.

The 49-year-old oversees an agency responsible for nearly 5.5 million students, 382,000 instructors and 1,200 districts. During his time at the helm, Morath has navigated a global health crisisTexas’ deadliest school shooting and dramatic enrollment declines. The former Dallas school board member has also taken over seven districts for failing academic standards.

State exams show children rebounding from pandemic learning loss in reading and science but lagging in math and social studies. On the preeminent national exam, Texas’ reading scores dropped to their lowest point in decades in 2024, the most recent year of those results, while eighth grade math outcomes plummeted faster than the national average.

Fewer than half of Black and Hispanic children met grade-level expectations on Texas’ own reading test this year, lagging more than 20 points behind white students and more than 30 points behind Asian students. Similar opportunity gaps existed in 2019, just before the pandemic and three years after Morath took office.

Majority-Black schools in Texas receive more Fs than A ratings.

Morath admits that Texas education, where Black and Hispanic children make up two-thirds of the population, must improve. However, he finds it important to clarify the job of the commissioner and his agency: to oversee and support schools. In many ways, he asserts, the buck “is designed to stop with local school boards.”

Evaluating his performance when locally elected trustees fall short of expectations, Morath concludes, “You have no choice but to give us an A.”

[…]

Critics point to student test results, low teacher morale and districts’ financial strains as evidence that Texas education has not improved under Morath’s leadership. His agency has grown in size and authority, they argue, while local autonomy has diminished. Some of Morath’s shortcomings have also cost taxpayers, such as the recent $8.4 million to correct thousands of mistakes in learning materials his agency produced for classrooms.

Even Morath’s supporters acknowledge the necessity for student performance to catch up with fanfare.

“We need to be seeing some stronger results on NAEP or else start to call the question,” said Petrilli, the Fordham Institute president, referring to the National Assessment of Educational Progress used to evaluate learning across the country. “Maybe it’s coming. I hope it’s coming. It needs to come soon, but it hasn’t come yet.”

Yeah, no, Mike, I think other options are in play. I don’t think he’s a failure – indeed, I thought pretty well of him before the takeover spree – but the results so far merit a C+ or B- at best. Maybe in a few years, if he’s still around and the overall results bounce back while the taken-over districts maintain whatever gains they achieved, then we can talk about a better grade. But that last section came after a part of the story where Gina Hinojosa promised to toss him out as a first act after being elected, so let’s not get ahead of ourselves. And hey, if he were objectively worth an A, or heck even an A-/B+, we probably wouldn’t be having this discussion. So hit the books, Mike. It’s your best bet.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

SCOTx allows parents of the surrogacy baby to take him home

I really hope this is the end.

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected a surrogate’s attempt to keep the child she delivered in Texas, clearing the way for the biological parents to take the medically fragile infant to California.

On Thursday, the Texas Supreme Court denied the request by McKenna West, an Alaskan surrogate who had tried to block the biological parents from removing the 1-month-old from Texas and taking him to a hospital in Los Angeles, where the couple lives.

“Sustaining the life of the medically fragile child is the paramount concern in this time-sensitive matter,” the court ruled, siding in favor of parents Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed. “The limited materials before this Court describe uncontroverted medical testimony of the child’s Texas physician indicating that ‘the child’s best interest in order to preserve the child’s life as long as possible [i]s an ICU-to-ICU transfer.’”

Among the testimony the Texas Supreme Court considered was that of both the guardian ad litem appointed by the court to represent the best interests of the infant and that of his doctors at Children’s Hospital in Dallas, where he’s being treated. Both had testified at an Aug. 25 hearing in Dallas. The trial court case has since been sealed from the public’s view.

A brief filed by the guardian ad litem Susan Duesler to the Texas Supreme Court says the baby’s doctor testified in court that he recommends that the child’s remaining surgeries be performed in a Los Angeles hospital and not doing the transfer soon would create “much more complicated treatment” for the baby. Duesler said the child, who the biological parents have named Rumi, should get the care his doctor recommends, which may include transferring the child to Los Angeles.

“The Guardian Ad Litem testified that the Parents’ ‘have followed the recommendations of the doctors to a T’ and the doctors have ‘unequivocally, no’ concerns regarding the Parents medical decision-making,” the couple’s lawyers stated in a brief before the Texas Supreme Court.

Lawyers for the parents also insisted that hospice is not part of the child’s medical plan.

Since Rumi’s birth in Dallas on Aug. 12, he’s been the subject of a high-profile, multi-state dispute that landed there this summer after West flew to Texas, which bans abortion, to seek custody of the child.

[…]

Rumi’s parents have also filed a heavily redacted response to West’s request to the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in the matter. Gilkar and Ahmed argue the case has already been decided and falls outside the high court’s jurisdiction. If the nation’s highest court were to intervene and rule in favor of West, it would interrupt their child’s medical care with “chaos.”

See here for the previous update and here for the Court’s one-paragraph order. This was a motion for a temporary restraining order that was part of a writ of mandamus, which I guess came up after that previous story was written. If we believe that SCOTUS will see no reason to butt in, then I do think this is over – this story notes that surrogate McKenna West has also lost cases in California and Alaska, so one presumes her options for further action are decreasing rapidly. I hope it’s over. Let these people and their kid get on with their future, whatever may happen, in peace. Slate, which explains that West is asking SCOTUS to terminate the parents’ custody because they had initially asked her to have an abortion, even though it was in her contract, has more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ReconMR poll: Talarico 49, Paxton 43

We go from those two weird polls that had James Talarico winning to the best poll result for Democrats overall so far, in which he’s leading by more. And not just him!

Rep. James Talarico

Hinojosa Now Leads Abbott by 4 Points; Talarico Widens Lead to 6 Points
US Senate: Talarico 49% Paxton 43% (from 47-43% in July)
Governor: Hinojosa 49% Abbott 45% (from Abbott 46-45% in July)
Attorney General: Middleton 45% Johnson 44% (from 46-44% in July)
Lt. Governor: Goodwin 47% Patrick 46% (from 48-46% in July)

In the race for Governor of Texas, Democratic State Rep. Gina Hinojosa now leads the incumbent Republican, Governor Greg Abbott, by four points, 49-45%, after trailing Abbott by a single point in July, according to a new Texas Poll of likely Texas voters released today. Democratic State Rep. James Talarico extends his lead over Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton for U.S. Senate to six points, 49-43%, from 47-43% in July.

“Hinojosa has opened a small four-point lead over Abbott. He had a six-point lead in June, and led by a point in July” ReconMR Senior Research Analyst Lindsey Hendren said. “The movement over the last three months is largely seen by looking at independent voters who now favor Hinojosa by 38 points, 65-27%, up from 13 points, 49-36%, in July.”

“Hinojosa leads by wide margins in Austin, Dallas/Ft. Worth, and San Antoinio/South Texas, while Abbott has a large lead in the rural parts of the state” Hendren said.

“Interestingly, while voters narrowly favor Hinojosa for election, they don’t think she’ll win the election. When asked who they think will win the election for governor, 62% say Abbott. Nearly a third of voters who say they’ll vote for Hinojosa think Abbott will ultimately win the election,” Hendren said.

Hinojosa’s favorability rating is 48-27%, up from 43-25% in July, while Abbott has a negative 45-53% (46-50% in July) favorability rating, mirroring his negative 45-53% job approval rating (47-51% in July).

“Hinojosa’s lead in the horserace is borne out by her gradually increasing favorability ratings as Abbott’s favorability and job approval ratings tick down,” Hendren said.

Voters say that Hinojosa would do a better job than Abbott on making prices more affordable (51-44%) and managing the water supply in Texas (49-43%). Voters are more divided on who’d be better at managing the construction of data centers; 45% say Hinojosa and 42% say Abbott. Abbott leads Hinojosa on the issues of securing America’s border with Mexico (53-39%) and keeping Texans safe (49-44%). Texans say Hinojosa is in touch with Texas values (52%), authentic (55%), honest (51%), and qualified to be the governor of Texas (53%). Voters say Abbott is qualified to be the governor of Texas (56%) and in touch with Texas values (50%). However, only 45% think he’s authentic and 41% say he’s honest.

“When it comes to issues, voters say Hinojosa would do a better job than Abbott on making prices more affordable, managing the water supply in Texas, and managing the construction of data centers. Voters say Abbott would do a better job securing the border with Mexico – by a large margin – and say he’d do a better job keeping Texans safe,” Hendren said.

“Voters have a split image of Abbott and Hinojosa. More voters feel that Abbott is qualified to be Governor, while at the same time viewing Hinojosa as more authentic and honest than Abbott, with both on similar footing on being in touch with Texas Values.”

Paxton has a negative 38-55% favorability rating, down slightly from 40-52% in July, while Talarico’s favorability rating is 50-39%, up from 46-39% in July. In June, a quarter of voters didn’t have an opinion about Talarico; now it’s just 10% of voters. The movement in favorability ratings is consistent with the movement in vote choice.

“The race for US Senate is heating up as Talarico extends his lead over Paxton,” Hendren said. “This movement can also be seen by looking at independent voters who now favor Talarico by 40 points, 64-24%, up from 23 points, 53-30% in July.”

When asked who they think will win the election for the Senator of Texas, 48% say Talarico and 45% say Paxton.

“Paxton’s Senate bid is being undermined by defections from within his own party. While nearly all Democrats say they are supporting Talarico, just under 9 in 10 Republicans say they are supporting Paxton. However, when asked who they want to control the Senate after November, nearly all voters say they want their respective party to win, highlighting Paxton’s weakness among his own party,” Hendren said.

The race for Attorney General tightens as Republican State Senator Mayes Middleton leads Democratic State Senator Nathan Johnson by one point, 45-44%, from 46-44% in July. The Democrat, State Rep. Vikki Goodwin, maintains her lead over the Republican incumbent Dan Patrick, 47-46%.

This is from the same pollster behind the two previous Texas Pulse polls. Not sure what the deal is with the rebranding, but it’s the same firm. The press release I got from them on Wednesday, in advance of their results being released, says this is “a collaborative effort between ReconMR and Siena Research Institute (SRI)” and that they will have another poll for next month.

The big news, besides Talarico’s six-point lead, which he has achieved before, is that Gina Hinojosa is leading Greg Abbott, and not by just a point. Hinojosa had been tied with Abbott in a previous poll and had trailed him by one in a couple of others, but this is the first one in which she is leading. And, as was the case with Vikki Goodwin – who leads Dan Patrick for a second time – it’s the first time a Dem has led in something other than Presidential or Senate polling in forever.

The crosstabs for this poll are here. It’s easy enough to see why Hinojosa was running as close to Talarico here, as opposed to some other polls where she lags him by ten points or more. Across the board, she’s doing about as well in the various subsamples as Talarico is. Being within 20 points of Greg Abbott with white voters is a good way to be competitive.

I don’t have a good explanation for why there’s such variance in Hinojosa’s performance compared to Talarico. Again, I do expect Talarico to run ahead of the rest of the Democratic pack. He has consistently drawn more Republican support than other Dems, and there remains a larger share of Republican voters who proclaim themselves undecided in that race. One way that gap may narrow might be if the big spending now being done on Paxton’s behalf has a positive effect on him, or (more likely) moves some of those Republicans away from Talarico and towards him. We’ll see that in the polls if it happens.

Finally, I should note that by definition this poll is a bit of an outlier. Not by a lot – as noted, Talarico has had leads of this magnitude before – but by the nature of Hinojosa’s lead, and the fact that only this pollster has recorded someone other than Talarico leading. Enjoy this as much as you want, but I for one would like to see another pollster show something similar. We have plenty of other evidence to suggest that the Republicans are super worried about this election. I just want to maintain some perspective, that’s all.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Lawsuit filed over land takings for Big Bend wall

This one by homeowners.

A coalition of Texas landowners along the U.S.-Mexico border are fighting the Trump administration’s plan to seize private property for border wall construction in several counties in the Big Bend region.

On Monday, six landowners and the nonprofit Conserve Big Bend, representing an additional 230 landowners, filed a lawsuit in U.S. district court in Washington D.C. against the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin and CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott, over the government’s border wall plans for the area.

“Hundreds of us are standing together to defend our constitutional rights and our private property — including land that many families have stewarded for generations,” said Clara Bensen, a board member of the nonprofit No Big Bend Wall, a project of Conserve Big Bend.

This legal challenge was announced Monday at a press conference at the Presidio County courthouse in Marfa, where a few dozen landowners, public officials — and even two horses — gathered to display flags saying “don’t tread on me” and “don’t mess with Big Bend.”

The lawsuit alleges that the DHS Secretary issued federal waivers for the project earlier this year even though the Big Bend region doesn’t meet the requirements needed for the waivers in the first place. These waivers determined the Big Bend Sector to be an area of “high illegal entry” for undocumented immigrants.

The Big Bend Sector, a 517-mile stretch of the border, saw fewer than 1.5% of the total apprehensions on the entire southwest border over the past five years, according to CBP data.

The determination allowed the agency to unlock expedited construction and bypass dozens of federal environmental, public health, cultural, and historic preservation laws under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). 

The lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop border wall construction in the entire region, including on steel vehicle barriers and roads inside the Big Bend National Park.

The suit also claims landowner’s fifth amendment rights to due process are being violated.

[…]

The landowners’ lawsuit is the latest in a slew of legal battles the federal government is facing over its “Smart Wall,” plans in the Big Bend region which involve the installation of 30-foot-high steel bollard walls, vehicle barriers, patrol roads, lighting, cameras and technology across private, state and federal lands along the Rio Grande river.

Since February, when landowners began receiving eminent domain letters from DHS, everyone from Republican sheriffs to landowners to river guides have come out in opposition to the wall, contending that barriers and walls will hurt the pristine desert landscape that fuels the region’s tourism economy. Signs and bumper stickers declaring “No Al Muro,” Spanish for “No to the wall,” quickly spread.

In April, a landowner coalition was created by No Big Bend Wall to provide local landowners with legal resources. The coalition has since grown to include 230 landowners across five counties, roughly half of the private landowners in the Big Bend Sector, according to the group.

David Keller, a landowner and plaintiff in the lawsuit filed Monday, said locals are fighting “the biggest threat” the Big Bend region has ever faced.

“People have refused access agreements. Survey and construction schedules have fallen months behind. Contractors have been sent home,” Keller said. “They were woefully unprepared for the hornet’s nest they stirred up. They have no idea how much we love this place.”

Lawsuits challenging the federal waivers have been unsuccessful thus far. Bensen said the Conserve Big Bend case is different in that it focuses on the Big Bend region specifically.

“It asks a narrower question which is whether DHS can lawfully authorize wall construction in this particular region given its geography, history and low level of border activity,” Bensen said.

See here, here, and here for some background on the other lawsuit, this one over the construction of the wall in Big Bend National Park, for which Customs and Border Patrol has issued a pause until September 30. I’m not picky, I’m happy for there to be a flood of lawsuits on a variety of grounds against this stupid wall. May they all succeed. NBC News and the Associated Press have more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HPD will lose some Flock cameras

They can thank Greg Abbott.

Floundering support for Flock cameras in Texas, including Gov. Greg Abbott’s suspension of state funding for their operation, will cost Houston more than 200 of the devices, according to Houston Police Chief Noe Diaz. City police conduct tens of thousands of searches each month using the vast — and vastly criticized — license-plate reading system.

“We are going to have to make some tough decisions,” Diaz said, noting the cameras are useful tools when police are searching for stolen vehicles, missing persons and other incidents where time is of the essence.

But the tool must be used “wisely and responsibly,” he said.

[…]

Houston police acquired 224 of their 553 cameras using the state funding Abbott rescinded, officials said. The money comes from a statewide $1 fee on auto insurance.

Dallas is also facing losing hundreds of its cameras, police there said in a Sept. 1 social media post. Department officials said they anticipate losing 321, or roughly half the police-funded cameras in the city.

Officials indicated the loss of cameras in Houston and Dallas will be felt in locations where private business and management districts have not installed them — often the same neglected neighborhoods where petty crime might be more common.

Diaz said the police-managed cameras in Houston are typically in “communities that do not have the resources of others.”

“It will impact them right away,” he said.

The losses, however, represent only a fraction of the cameras in the communities where Flock has sold subscriptions.

[…]

There are between 5,700 and 6,000 automatic license plate readers, or ALPRs, installed in the Houston area, with more than 2,700 of those around or within the Sam Houston Tollway and the city’s urban core, according to DeFlock, a national group which advocates for their removal.

The vast majority of cameras in the city were not installed or funded through the police department, but by other public agencies, private businesses or local groups. Flock cameras along Washington Avenue’s bar and restaurant corridor, for example, were installed using money from the area’s parking benefits district. Along Kirby Drive, West University Place installed and maintains a Flock camera at every intersection between Bissonnet and Holcombe.

[…]

About 3,200 of the department’s 5,400 officers have access to Flock, Diaz said, though about 1,300 would be considered “frequent” users. The department logs “north of 90,000 queries a month,” Diaz said.

Critics note that volume — which makes Houston the place with the most Flock searches in the U.S., based on some databases of nationwide searches obtained by critics and the media — also makes verifying the legitimacy of the queries tough.

Flock has some built-in checks asking officers to log their reason for each search, but control of the system largely rests with the police departments that pay for access to it.

“We have seen them abuse it, and it is not transparent,” [Christopher Rivera, senior advocacy manager for criminal legal programs at the Texas Civil Rights Project] said, citing cases of officers at police departments locally and across the nation conducting improper searches of ex-spouses, former partners and others.

No HPD officers have been accused of improperly using the system, though critics note it remains unclear how Houston police could ferret out improper use across more than 1 million searches annually.

See here for some background. I agree that Flock and similar cameras have value as a crime fighting tool. It’s the lack of transparency, as Chris Rivera notes, that’s the problem. If all those HPD searches aren’t auditable, then we’re just taking their word for it that they’re all using it responsibly, and we all know that’s not good enough. But HPD isn’t going to implement that on their own, so until they’re required to be more forthcoming, that’s what we’ve got. I’m curious how many cameras owned or managed by Harris County are also affected by this Abbott special. At least there’s some impetus for change there.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Jesus Nieto

Jesus Nieto

I have one more Harris Central Appraisal District Board of Directors interview to bring you, and that’s with Jesus Nieto, who is running for HCAD Position 3. Nieto is a UH graduate who has worked as a community organizer and a nonprofit director. He ran for Katy ISD this past May as a Book-Loving Texan’s Guide recommended candidate. He fell short in that race but his activism for libraries and against that Board’s anti-LGBTQ+ policies continues. HCAD Position 3 is one of two seats won by Republicans in the 2024 special elections and is the only one for which the Republican incumbent is running for re-election. Here’s the interview:

Here’s the transcript, courtesy of Greg Wythe. I will begin running legislative candidates’ interviews next week, with one more statewide candidate interview to kick the week off. Let me know what you think.

PREVIOUSLY:

Rep. Jon Rosenthal – Railroad Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Nathan Johnson – Attorney General – Transcript
Clayton Tucker – Ag Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt – Comptroller – Transcript
Commissioner Adrian Garcia – Harris County Commissioners Court, Precinct 2 – Transcript
Shaun Finnie – CD02 – Transcript
Michelle Palmer – SBOE6 – Transcript
Chris Ehlinger – HCAD Position 2 – Transcript

From the primaries:

Leticia Gutierrez – CD09 – Transcript
Christian Menefee, CD18 (from the special election) – Transcript
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, CD29 – Transcript
Melissa McDonough – CD38 – Transcript
Justin Early, CD31 – Transcript

Staci Childs – HD131 – Transcript

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge – Transcript
Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney – Transcript
Traci Gibson, HCDP Chair – Transcript

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Q&A: Judge Angela Lancelin

(Note: As I have done in past elections, I am running a series of Q&As for Democratic judicial candidates. I ran a series of these for candidates in contested primaries, and now these are for the rest of the candidates. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. Much more information about Democratic candidates, including links to interviews and judicial Q&As, can be found on Erik Manning’s spreadsheet.

Judge Angela Lancelin

1. Who are you and in which court do you preside?

I am Judge Angela M. Lancelin, presiding judge of the 245th District Court in Harris County, Texas. I have served on this bench since 2023, following more than 30 years as a family law attorney, including nearly three decades with the Office of the Attorney General's Child Support Division.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 245th is a family court. Our docket is diverse and often complex, covering divorce, annulment, name changes, adoption, the adjudication of parentage, and modifications and terminations of the parent-child relationship. Our primary goal is to help families resolve their disputes fairly, and to help them reach resolution without court intervention whenever possible.

3. What have been your main accomplishments during your time on this bench?

Since taking the bench, I have focused on expanding access to justice for the many families who appear in the 245th without an attorney. I reviewed and modified our court's policies and procedures wherever they created a hindrance to access, strengthened referrals to legal aid and self-help resources, and worked to keep our docket moving so families are not left waiting longer than necessary for resolution.

4. What do you hope to accomplish in your courtroom going forward?

I want to build on that progress: continuing to make the court more accessible and easier to navigate for self-represented litigants, applying the law consistently and fairly to every family that comes before me, and keeping the 245th efficient so cases affecting children and families are resolved without unnecessary delay.

5. Why is this race important?

Family courts decide some of the most consequential matters in people's lives, including who a child lives with, whether support is paid, and whether a family is kept safe. Whoever sits on this bench needs the experience and temperament to handle that responsibility fairly, and this race determines whether that experience continues.

6. Why should people vote for you in November?

I bring more than 30 years of family law experience, as a legal aid attorney, as a Special Litigator for the State, and now as your presiding judge ; to a role where that experience matters every day. My judicial philosophy is simple: apply the law fairly, listen carefully, and remember that behind every case are real people with real lives. I am asking Harris County voters for the opportunity to continue that work.

PREVIOUSLY:

Judge Damiane Dianne Curvey, 280th Family District Court
Judge M. Monica Singh, Harris County Civil Court at Law #4
Judge Cory Sepolio, 269th Civil District Court
Samantha Davis, 313th Juvenile District Court
Judge Melissa Morris, 263rd Criminal District Court
Judge Toria J. Finch, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #9
Judge Linda Marie Dunson, 309th Family District Court
Judge Kelley Andrews, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #

From the primaries:

Judge Kristen Hawkins, Supreme Court Justice, Place 7
Sarah Beth Landau, Chief Justice of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Judge Tanya Garrison, 157th Civil District Court
Julia Maldonado, 183rd Criminal District Court
Judge Brian Warren, 209th Criminal District Court
Judge Josh Hill, 232nd Criminal District Court
Judge Leah Shapiro, 315th Juvenile District Court
Judge James Horwitz, Harris County Probate Court #4
Ebony Williams, Harris County Civil Court at Law #2
Judge Andrew Wright, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #7

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Lawsuit blaming Texas’ “merciless” abortion ban for woman’s death filed

I will be watching this closely.

The family of Tierra Walker, who died of preeclampsia at the age of 37 when she was 20 weeks pregnant, has filed a lawsuit in Texas, saying she was denied an abortion that could have saved her life as her health quickly deteriorated.

Lawyers for Walker’s family filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Bexar County District Court accusing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, several of her doctors and others of “deliberate indifference, discrimination, and medical mistreatment [that] ultimately caused her horrific and tragic death” in 2024. Preeclampsia is a severe high blood pressure condition in pregnancy that can be fatal.

Walker’s family alleges Paxton — a Republican who is currently running for Senate — and another defendant, Stephen Brint Carlton, executive director of the Texas Medical Board, stripped her of her right to life by imposing “a merciless blanket prohibition” on abortion, while the doctors allegedly failed to offer life-saving medical treatment.

Paxton has been outspoken in his defense of Texas’ near-total abortion ban. He has filed lawsuits against doctors and organizations who ship abortion pills to Texas from out of state. His office has not responded to CBS News’ request for comment.

“At every turn, Texas’s political and medical establishments not only failed but actively harmed Ms. Walker,” the lawsuit alleges.

“Tierra Walker is dead because not one of her … healthcare providers would give her the one medical procedure that would have saved her life,” Michelle Maloney, an attorney representing the family, told CBS News. They refused, she said, because of what she called “the immense culture of fear” that has developed around abortion in the state of Texas since the near-total ban came into effect in 2022.

ProPublica was first to report on the circumstances of Walker’s death.

[…]

Walker learned she was nearly eight weeks pregnant on Sept. 19, 2024, during an emergency room visit.

She had been working to get her health back on track after struggling with chronic health problems for years, including obesity, high blood pressure, asthma and Type 2 diabetes. Three years earlier, she had developed preeclampsia while pregnant with twins, which led to the stillbirth of her twins and “sent her into a health spiral,” the lawsuit says.

By mid-2024, her health was improving — her blood pressure was lower and she was losing weight with the help of a GLP-1 drug.

An emergency room doctor noted in Walker’s medical records it was “too early in pregnancy to have eclampsia” and she was sent home after her blood pressure medications were adjusted to account for her pregnancy.

She returned to the hospital hours later as she continued to have seizures, nausea, vomiting and complained of pain. Her medical records noted that her seizures may have been triggered by several factors, including pregnancy-related nausea, anxiety and stress.

She was hospitalized for most of October, where medical records show she received extensive testing for her seizures, which doctors noted were non-epileptic “functional seizures,” unrelated to her pregnancy or preeclampsia.

Her records show she was surrounded by family members for nearly the entirety of her hospital stay, and that she was repeatedly offered mental health and psychiatric treatments for anxiety.

“They really treated her so bad because they thought she was crazy,” her aunt LaTanya Walker told CBS News. “One day they told me to tell her husband, ‘Can you go tell him that this is all in her head?'”

During the lengthy hospital stay in October, according to the lawsuit, Walker and her family told medical staff “that the pregnancy was going to cost Ms. Walker her life, and asked if she could terminate the pregnancy.”

According to Maloney, Tierra Walker first asked for an abortion at another hospital on Oct. 12, and then asked at University Health on Oct. 30, when she would have been about 11 weeks pregnant.

“Despite the clear risk to her life in continuing the pregnancy, none of University Health’s staff counseled Ms. Walker on the possibility of abortion as a life-saving medical treatment, offered her this treatment, or suggested that she leave the state. Instead, hospital staff kept insisting ‘nothing is wrong with the baby’ and continued to refuse the care that she needed on that basis,” the lawsuit alleges.

In late October and early November, two doctors documented in Walker’s medical records that she was at “high” risk of death.

Still, she was discharged from the hospital, only to be readmitted days later.

“I asked them time and time again to give her an abortion. And they would tell me … ‘It’s her, but it’s not the baby,'” LaTanya Walker said.

The lawsuit claims hospital staff responded to her requests for an abortion by saying, “Your baby is fine,” while allegedly “disregarding Ms. Walker’s deteriorating health.”

In a statement to CBS News, the Texas Medical Board said that under its current rules, “when addressing a condition that is or may become emergent, a physician is not required to wait until a mother’s life is in immediate danger or her major bodily function is at immediate risk before providing necessary medical care” and noted that in some circumstances, that care “may include the termination of a pregnancy.

Tierra Walker is far from the first woman to die as a result of Texas’ abortion ban, but her death the first that I know of to result in a lawsuit like this. I must have missed that ProPublica story when it first came out last November, but it was linked to in this story about the Texas Medical Board’s mostly useless “how not to get sent to jail by Ken Paxton for abortion-related stuff” training. Which I said was useless because there was nothing in law, policy, rhetoric, or anything else that would stop or even discourage Ken Paxton from going after anyone or anything he thought was doing something he didn’t approve of.

The party line from Republicans has always been that any problems relating to their sociopathic law is entirely due to doctors and hospitals misinterpreting it, and so nothing is their fault. I’m sure that will be the defense they push if this makes it into a courtroom. I am of course hopeful that Tierra Walker’s family will get some kind of justice out of this, but I fear that this will not survive first contact with the Fifth Circuit. But I will keep an eye on it. In the meantime, read that ProPublica story about what happened to Tierra Walker, and remember her name. The Trib, the Chron, KEN5, and The 19th have more.

UPDATE: It has been pointed out to me that this suit was filed in state district court, not federal, and so the Fifth Circuit will not be involved. I’m still wary about the possible outcomes, but I am very glad for that.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rogue ICE agent arrested in Minnesota

Good.

Minnesota law enforcement arrested fugitive ICE agent Christian Castro yesterday after he returned to the Twin Cities to face separate federal charges stemming from a January shooting of a Venezuelan national during Operation Metro Surge.

The arrest on more serious state charges of four counts of second-degree assault with a deadly weapon came after Castro managed to avoid extradition from Texas, where Republican Gov. Greg Abbott successfully stonewalled Minnesota’s extradition request. After spending 90 days in a Texas jail while the extradition fight played out in court, Castro was released last month.

Castro was forced to return to Minnesota when the Trump DOJ indicted him there for lying to federal investigators about the shooting, even though it eschewed more serious civil rights charges against him.

The Wednesday afternoon arrest came near Castro’s lawyer’s office. There were dueling accounts of what transpired. His lawyer claims that Castro had prearranged to surrender voluntarily at his law office and did so. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety agreed that talks were underway for Castro to surrender but that law enforcement officers saw an opportunity to arrest him on the street and took advantage of it.

Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty announced the arrest on social media and took one last dig at Abbott: “Gov. Abbott’s attempt to shield Mr. Castro has failed.”

Castro is scheduled to make his first appearance in state court today, just ahead of his first appearance in federal court Friday.

See here for the most recent update. “Today” was Thursday, when that news broke. Part of me now thinks this was a whole lot of fuss over what turned out to be not very much, since he was destined to go back to Minnesota once the federal charges were announced. But we didn’t know that at the time, and Greg Abbott’s actions remain inexcusable regardless of the outcome. I wish I knew of a way for the state of Minnesota to inflict some consequences on him, but I’m coming up empty. At least we the people have a shot at it now. The Trib has more.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Chris Ehlinger

Chris Ehlinger

My next two interviews for the week will be for the HCAD Board of Directors. You may recall that after last year’s very low turnout special election runoffs, we had one Democrat and two Republicans in those seats. The Democrat, Kathy Blueford Daniels, is running for re-election in Place 1. Running in Place 2 for an open seat – incumbent Kyle Scott did not file for re-election – is Democrat Chris Ehlinger. (There’s a second Democrat as well, Jordyn Wilson, to whom I have not yet spoken.) Ehilnger is a CPA/MBA with 20+ years’ experience in Auditing, Appraisal Valuation, Real Estate, Banking, and Executive Management. He’s also a Texas A&M grad who grew up poor in rural South Texas, a Democratic precinct chair, and a volunteer for groups like the Timbergrove Manor Civic Association and Super Neighborhood 14. Here’s what we talked about:

Here’s the transcript, courtesy of Greg Wythe. I’ll have the other HCAD interview for you tomorrow and then we’re on to The Lege. Let me know what you think.

PREVIOUSLY:

Rep. Jon Rosenthal – Railroad Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Nathan Johnson – Attorney General – Transcript
Clayton Tucker – Ag Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt – Comptroller – Transcript
Commissioner Adrian Garcia – Harris County Commissioners Court, Precinct 2 – Transcript
Shaun Finnie – CD02 – Transcript
Michelle Palmer – SBOE6 – Transcript

From the primaries:

Leticia Gutierrez – CD09 – Transcript
Christian Menefee, CD18 (from the special election) – Transcript
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, CD29 – Transcript
Melissa McDonough – CD38 – Transcript
Justin Early, CD31 – Transcript

Staci Childs – HD131 – Transcript

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge – Transcript
Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney – Transcript
Traci Gibson, HCDP Chair – Transcript

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Q&A: Judge Kelley Andrews

(Note: As I have done in past elections, I am running a series of Q&As for Democratic judicial candidates. I ran a series of these for candidates in contested primaries, and now these are for the rest of the candidates. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. Much more information about Democratic candidates, including links to interviews and judicial Q&As, can be found on Erik Manning’s spreadsheet.

Judge Kelley Andrews

1. Who are you and in which court do you preside?

My name is Kelley Andrews. I am the presiding judge of Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 6.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

Harris County Criminal Court No. 6 is a misdemeanor court. We hear Class B and Class A misdemeanor cases which are cases that have a potential sentencing range of up to 180 days or up to 1 year in the Harris County Jail, respectively. The types of cases misdemeanor courts hear include, but are not limited DWIs, domestic violence cases, violations of protective orders, thefts, trespasses, unlawful carrying of firearms and criminal mischiefs.

3. What have been your main accomplishments during your time on this bench?

Since taking the bench in January 2019, I have remained focus on addressing this issues that factor into a person’s arrest and subsequent criminal charge. Addressing issues like mental health, substance abuse, and housing insecurity can change the trajectory a person is on within the criminal justice system and in doing so, help them to have a better/healthier future, lower recidivism rates, and address safety concerns of the community. I also preside over the Misdemeanor Women’s Sober Court in addition to my regular docket. There I work with a specialized team that acutely focuses on recovery for women that have entered into the Sober Court program.

4. What do you hope to accomplish in your courtroom going forward?

I would like to continue the work that I have been focused on since beginning my tenure as judge of Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 6. I will remain focused addressing factors that encourage a person’s contact with the criminal justice system and balancing that with the needs of the community to ensure its safety.

5. Why is this race important?

Misdemeanor courts are often the place where a person who finds themself in criminal trouble will land first. The are also the place where people are first diagnosed with mental health and/or substance abuse issues. The misdemeanor courts are uniquely situated to help redirect people out of the criminal justice system and in doing so can be tools that work to benefit and protect the community as a whole.

6. Why should people vote for you in November?

I have devoted 100% of my legal career to the area of criminal law. I have worked in the Harris County criminal courthouse as an attorney and then as a judge for 19 years. I am familiar with all the many departments that courts need to work with to move cases along, to address mental health issues, housing issues and substance abuse issues. I have experience and that experience is coupled with compassion-a necessary trait for balancing the rights of a person with the safety and welfare of the community. I treat every person that finds themselves in Court 6 with dignity and respect and believe in equal access to justice for all.

PREVIOUSLY:

Judge Damiane Dianne Curvey, 280th Family District Court
Judge M. Monica Singh, Harris County Civil Court at Law #4
Judge Cory Sepolio, 269th Civil District Court
Samantha Davis, 313th Juvenile District Court
Judge Melissa Morris, 263rd Criminal District Court
Judge Toria J. Finch, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #9
Judge Linda Marie Dunson, 309th Family District Court

From the primaries:

Judge Kristen Hawkins, Supreme Court Justice, Place 7
Sarah Beth Landau, Chief Justice of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Judge Tanya Garrison, 157th Civil District Court
Julia Maldonado, 183rd Criminal District Court
Judge Brian Warren, 209th Criminal District Court
Judge Josh Hill, 232nd Criminal District Court
Judge Leah Shapiro, 315th Juvenile District Court
Judge James Horwitz, Harris County Probate Court #4
Ebony Williams, Harris County Civil Court at Law #2
Judge Andrew Wright, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #7

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Two more polls show Talarico leading

They’re a little weird in different ways, but here they are. First, Mason-Dixon:

Texas Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico is leading in another consecutive poll against Republican Ken Paxton, and the poll breaks down which Texans are backing who.

A Mason-Dixon Polling & Research, Inc. poll released Sept. 15 showed Talarico leading Paxton 46% to 43%, with Libertarian Ted Brown at 3% and 8% of voters undecided.

Talarico’s lead is within the poll’s 4-point margin of error, as it surveyed 625 registered Texas voters from Sept. 8-10 who said they are likely to vote in the November 2026 election.

Here’s a breakdown of where Paxton and Talarico are pulling their support less than two months from Election Day and how it compares to recent polling in August and September.

By demographics, the Mason-Dixon poll shows Talarico’s lead is driven by strong support from women, younger voters, Black voters, Hispanic voters, and independents. Talarico wins women by 16 points (52%-36%), voters ages 18-34 by 14 points (51%-37%), Black voters by 75 points (85%-10%), Hispanic voters by 18 points (54%-36%) and independents by 21 points (51%-30%).

Paxton, by contrast, is anchored by Republicans, white voters, men and older Texans. He wins Republicans 88%-5%, white voters 54%-36% and men 51%-39%. He also performs best among voters ages 35-49 and runs roughly even among voters 65 and older.

Breaking down the candidates’ support by region, Paxton is drawing the majority of his support in East Texas (58%) and West Texas (52%).

Talarico draws a majority of his support from the Houston metro area (46%), Central Texas (57%) and South Texas (54%). Both candidates are tied at 45% in the Dallas-Fort Worth region.

Here’s the poll data, which leads with the Governor’s race, in which Greg Abbott leads Gina Hinojosa 48-41, one of his better recent results. As I’ve said before, I expect Talarico to run ahead of the pack, but not by that much. The main difference here seems to be with white voters, whom Talarico loses by 18 and Hinojosa loses by 29. This is one of the better showings for Paxton among Republicans, for what it’s worth.

Amusing headline for this poll: “Ken Paxton Within Striking Distance of Defeating Talarico in New Texas Poll”. Gotta love horse race reporting.

If I thought a ten-point spread between Talarico’s performance and Hinojosa’s was a bit much, how about a thirteen point spread?

After trailing by 2% in a survey conducted in June, James Talarico now holds a 5% lead over Republican Ken Paxton (50-45) in a new SoCal Strategies Texas Poll of 649 likely voters. Despite this, incumbent governor Greg Abbott appears to be in a strong position in his quest for a fourth term, leading Democratic challenger Gina Hinojosa 52-44.

Senate Race
Since our last survey, nearly everything seems to be breaking in Talarico’s direction. His lead among independents grew from 10% to 45% and he is now picking off 12% of Republicans. While Ken Paxton has maintained most of his lead among white voters, Talarico expanded his advantage with Hispanic voters from 10% to 38%. Voters age 18-29 also back Talarico by 46%. While Talarico being at 50% suggests he is the strong favorite in the race, there is some evidence that points to the possibility of the margin tightening: much like the last poll, Republicans are less decided than Democrats. While 6% of respondents who said they backed Trump in 2024 are currently undecided in the senate race, the same can only be said of 1% of those who say they voted for Harris. To have a chance, Paxton will need to win nearly all of these voters and peel back a substantial portion of the 12% of Republicans who say they would vote for Talarico if the election were held today.

Gubernatorial Race
Despite Ken Paxton’s struggles, Governor Abbott still seems poised to win re-election. Though his margin has narrowed from our last survey, which had him up 12, he still leads Gina Hinojosa by 8%. The movement comes almost entirely from independent voters, who now break for Hinojosa after Abbott had a 50-40 lead among them in our last survey. Like Paxton, Abbott has also collapsed with Hispanic voters, but he offsets this with a sizeable 34% lead among Whites. Unlike in the senate race, the undecideds in the gubernatorial survey appear to lean left. Those who say they are yet to decide between Abbott and Hinojosa, but have made up their minds in the senate, break for James Talarico 2-1. So, while there is a large ticket split for now, an analysis of the undecideds suggests the races could converge as we get closer to November.

Here are the crosstabs, which have Talarico trailing among white voters by only 17, exactly half of Hinojosa’s deficit among whites. This poll also has a ludicrous share of Black voters going Republican – 23% for Paxton and 32% for Abbott. Put me down for the under on each. Those are small subsamples and one should be extremely wary of them in general, but my goodness. I found the M-D poll as usual via The Downballot, and went from there to the NYT Senate poll tracker, where I found the SoCal Strategies poll.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

More French stuff

I like this take.

Bo French wasn’t always this way. When he first ran for statewide office in Texas in 2016, he was an oil industry scion who hadn’t quite found his way: a partnership with American sniper Chris Kyle had fallen apart after his death; other business ventures petered out. In an ad, French portrayed himself as a nice guy: a compassionate conservative, and a family man to boot. His wife appeared in one campaign video, describing him as a “humble” man possessed of a “servant’s heart.”

Ten years later, French portrays himself differently. He’s now openly xenophobic, an attribute that attracted national attention when, last Sunday, he posted to X that a group of nonwhite UT students celebrating at a football was “a problem” that had was “now obviously far worse than anyone imagined.” It caused a firestorm, and was enough to earn condemnation from the Texas GOP; not a small feat given that Republicans in the state have spent the last year running on demonizing Muslims.

[…]

Republican leaders across the Texas firmament condemned French as they could. Attorney general and current Senate candidate Ken Paxton (R) tried to do so while suggesting that his opponent James Talarico (D) was the real racist; Gov. Greg Abbott (R) issued a statement that began with the phrase, “That is not my message.” Karl Rove reportedly said that he would grant French the distinction of being the first Republican candidate in decades to not get his vote.

Grasping why French’s UT post crossed a line and earned this reaction requires background both on the Texas nominee’s campaign of low-rent racism and the Texas GOP’s attitude towards the influx of Asian immigrants in the state.

French’s post wasn’t anything particularly new for him. He’s spent the last year denigrating people online in increasingly brazen ways as he runs for a position that will grant him oversight of oil regulation and waste byproduct policy. Last year, French posted a poll asking whether Jews or Muslims posed a greater threat to the United States. At CPAC, he endorsed 100 million deportations — 29% of the U.S. population. He posed for a photo with former CBP commander and recently minted far-right impresario Greg Bovino. As recently as July, he wrote, “Ok boys, it’s time to go round up all the Chinese and send them packing!” It’s unclear what prompted that mix of John Wayne and gutter racism.

Much of French’s diatribes have focused on Islam and Muslim immigrants. He’s said that Muslims should not be allowed in the United States and accused “islamists” of “using our Constitution against us.” That kind of rhetoric, as extreme as it is, has become a staple for state GOP leaders. Over the past year, both Abbott and Paxton have launched investigations and taken action against the Muslim community in the state. The Texas primary Republican ballot this year contained a question asking whether to ban Sharia law; it received 95 percent support.

Texas politicians have directed much of this Islamophobia towards communities in the suburbs north of Dallas. The area has seen massive growth in recent years, and is now home to large immigrant communities from South Asia. One mosque in the area, called EPIC, became the target of vitriol last year after releasing a video outlining a planned community meant to serve Muslim Texans.

At the same time, a coterie of local far-right activists and social media influencers with national platforms and nativist leanings have descended on the area, trying to hold up South Asian immigration in general to the area as a scandal. They tend to single out Indian immigrants in particular, filming videos with shots of Hindu temples and South Asian businesses.

See here for the background. It’s important to keep in mind that this isn’t a one-off by some nobody who’s out by himself in the wilderness. This is who Bo French is, and he has a whole lot of company in the Republican Party.

But at least he’s causing his comrades who are better at keeping this under wraps some headaches.

And just like that, Bo French has become a litmus test for every Republican on the ballot in Texas.

GOP candidates are now being asked if they agree with French, who is running for Texas Railroad commissioner, or if they condemn him for posting a picture of non-white University of Texas football fans celebrating the Longhorns win on Saturday night and calling them a problem.

“I heard UT graduation this year looked like this,” the Republican wrote on X. “I didn’t believe it. The problem is now obviously far worse than anyone imagined.”

And in case there was any doubt where he was going with that post, he followed up with another, using the same picture, saying, “Americans have been displaced by foreigners. It’s everywhere and far worse than any of us could imagine.”

French’s comments are spreading like a wildfire online, and they couldn’t come at a worse time for Republicans, who have just sunk $80 million in TV ads to try and take down Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico. French has single-handedly shifted attention away from Talarico and instead put it on which Republicans are bold enough to condemn him in a state where more than 60% of the state’s population is now non-white.

In short, French has hijacked GOP messaging in Texas just as counties across the state are mailing out their first ballots for absentee voters this week.

“Bo French is a distraction to other candidates in a very challenging political environment,” Austin-based GOP strategist Matt Mackowiak said.

[…]

The problem for Texas Republicans is that the backlash is quickly overwhelming social media and and breaking into the national mainstream, as people discover French is the GOP nominee for a statewide office. The Railroad Commission regulates the state’s oil and gas industry.

“There’s just something broken about people who see a good time at a football game and turn it immediately to race,” said Erick Erickson, an influential Christian broadcaster and conservative commentator.

Erickson predicted that students in the photo would soon come forward and point out they are native Texans.

They already have, Erick. And my heart just shatters for all those poor put-upon Republicans who have to say something about Bo French, none of which includes the words “and so you should vote for Jon Rosenthal instead of this piece of trash”. There is some debate over how much French’s nasty racism will be noticed by normal people and not just the weirdos on Twitter. All I can say is that my Instagram feed is still dominated by Bo French stuff. I don’t claim to be representative of anything, but there are many more normal people on Instagram than on Twitter.

I also like this Politico story.

The divide emerging among Texas Republicans over the social media post — and Democrats’ eagerness to capitalize on it — show just how precarious the party finds its position this cycle. Texas Republicans were already worrying about losing support from Hispanic and other minority voters amid a tough economic environment and President Donald Trump’s unpopular immigration agenda. They need to hold onto or improve the incremental gains they made over previous cycles with voters of color in a fast-changing state where non-Hispanic white people now only make up 37% of the population. The stakes are high this cycle: Most polls show Paxton slightly trailing in a Senate race that could determine control of the upper chamber; Abbott appears to be in the toughest of his four election fights; and the state is home to several key House races.

“I don’t think [French’s post] independently and universally sours voter sentiment. But it contributes to GOP declining numbers with Hispanic voters particularly in the South Texas congressional races which we hope to win,” said Alfredo Rodriguez, a Dallas-based Republican strategist, who called on French to “stop the petty political theatrics.”

The blast radius of French’s posts was wide enough to garner carefully worded responses from the top of the ticket. Abbott said in a Sunday statement that French’s post “is not my message,” before noting unity “doesn’t mean that Texas cannot also lead in having the toughest immigration laws of any state in America and freezing H1B visas at our universities.”

Two of the students in the photo told the Dallas Morning News that they’re U.S. citizens. Most UT students are Texans — state law requires that 90% of each freshman class come from in-state — and there is no evidence that the students in the photo French posted are foreigners.

Some Republicans weren’t thrilled about Abbott’s response.

“This had nothing to do with illegal immigrants,” said Anang Mittal, an Indian American national GOP strategist, of Abbott’s comments. “These were students at a college game. They’re not H-1B. If they’re students, they’re on a student visa. … It’s pretty damn disgusting of Greg Abbott to say, ‘I condemn racism, but also, like, we’re keeping all the Indians out.’ That’s essentially what that tweet read to me.”

[…]

Other Republicans were less willing to fully denounce French’s comments.

“I don’t really know the guy. I heard he said some not so pleasant things,” said Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Texas), who said he hadn’t seen the posts — but launched into a criticism of immigration nonetheless. “I am concerned about the number of people living in this country, and we don’t even know who they really are,” he said. ”Shut the border down for 10 years, and then let’s try to figure out who we got in this country because we don’t even know.”

Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.), who campaigned with Talarico in Houston on Sunday, said French’s posts came up in conversations with every Asian American voter he met.

“Everyone was talking about it,” Kim said. “Every single Asian American that I was with yesterday raised this with me. They were saying this is an example of, ‘Not only are they not courting us or engaging with us, but they’re actively demonizing us, actively being xenophobic and racist towards us.’ We need leaders that stand up against this.”

The political damage could also extend — potentially for years — to Texas’ small but growing Indian American population, the demographic group French appeared to target in his posts. Both Dallas and Houston have significant Indian American populations. In 2019, an event at a Houston stadium headlined by Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi drew over 50,000 attendees.

French’s comments could alienate those same voters, said Brendan Steinhauser, a Republican consultant in Austin.

“He just irritated a bunch of people, many of whom could be supporters and could be Republicans,” said Steinhauser, a University of Texas graduate. “I’d be willing to bet a lot of those kids that he was posting a photo of are probably, you know, their parents might be Republicans, or they might be Republicans, or conservatives, or independent-leaning conservatives.”

That’s your mess to clean up there, Brendan. There is a very simple way for Republicans to truly distance themselves from Bo French. Karl Rove figured it out. And so has Glen Whitley:

When French unleashed a string of inflammatory social media posts in 2025, several GOP officeholders — including Patrick, the lieutenant governor — called on him to resign as county GOP chair. But Republicans now refuse to tell French to drop out now “because that might mean that there would be a Democrat elected statewide,” said Glen Whitley, a Republican former Tarrant County judge. “That’s the bottom line.”

“That’s part of my frustration with the Republican Party altogether: They talk about being Christian, but they get up every morning to talk about who they hate,” said Whitley, who still identifies as Republican but endorsed Talarico for Senate.

Yeah, there sure do seem to be a whole lot of self-proclaimed “Christians” over there who are completely unfamiliar with – or in too many cases, hostile to – the things that Jesus talked about. Maybe there’s a good starting point for all of the aggrieved consultants and advisors who wish they could talk about anything else but Bo French.

UPDATE: Add this Mother Jones story, in which I learn that Bo French wants to make America be Rhodesia, to the pile.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Texas blog roundup for the week of September 14

The Texas Progressive Alliance is still laughing about Trumpapalooza as it brings you this week’s roundup.

Off the Kuff interviewed four Democratic statewide candidates: Rep. Jon Rosenthal, Sen. Nathan Johnson, Clayton Tucker, and Sen. Sarah Eckhardt.

SocraticGadfly, with author Jack Herrera providing his email on Twitter and asking for feedback, strongly critiqued and fact-checked Texas Monthly’s piece on the Rio Grande water crisis, and got no response from Herrera — and, unsurprisingly, none from the Monthly, either.

Neil at the Houston Democracy Project noted that Mayor Whitmire & HPD changed city policy on mandatory investigation of shootings involving federal law enforcement not long after Trump started his 2nd term. Maybe this action had a part in Whitmire saying off the bat that the city had no role in the ICE killing of Salgado.

==========================

And here are some posts of interest from other Texas blogs.

Paradise in Hell did a yard sign survey.

Laura Rodriguez considers a lesson she learned from 9/11.

City of Yes reflected on the absence of the Twin Towers.

The TSTA Blog finds no moral imperative to send public funds to private schools.

Chris Tackett documents the polling place closures ordered by the Republicans on Tarrant County Commissioners Court.

Aleksandra Vaca is very clear about the need to support James Talarico over Ken Paxton in the Senate race.

The Fort Worth Report welcomes some brand-new endangered gharial crocodiles to the zoo.

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Interview with Michelle Palmer

Michelle Palmer

What can you say about the State Board of Education? Sometimes they lie dormant, and sometimes they go full-on whackadoo. That’s where we are now, and so another thing you could say about the SBOE is that it would be a much better and more functional entity if it had people like Michelle Palmer were on it. Palmer is a history and government teacher, an advocate for her students, and a dedicated activist and organizer. She’s run for this office twice before, in 2020 and 2022, and is as dedicated to the challenge as ever. I’ve interviewed her before, you can listen to our 2022 conversation here, and you can listen to our 2026 conversation right here:

Here’s the transcript, courtesy of Greg Wythe. Did I say I had one more interview for you this week? Turns out I have two, so get ready. And let me know what you think.

PREVIOUSLY:

Rep. Jon Rosenthal – Railroad Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Nathan Johnson – Attorney General – Transcript
Clayton Tucker – Ag Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt – Comptroller – Transcript
Commissioner Adrian Garcia – Harris County Commissioners Court, Precinct 2 – Transcript
Shaun Finnie – CD02 – Transcript

From the primaries:

Leticia Gutierrez – CD09 – Transcript
Christian Menefee, CD18 (from the special election) – Transcript
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, CD29 – Transcript
Melissa McDonough – CD38 – Transcript
Justin Early, CD31 – Transcript

Staci Childs – HD131 – Transcript

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge – Transcript
Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney – Transcript
Traci Gibson, HCDP Chair – Transcript

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Q&A: Judge Linda Marie Dunson

(Note: As I have done in past elections, I am running a series of Q&As for Democratic judicial candidates. I ran a series of these for candidates in contested primaries, and now these are for the rest of the candidates. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. Much more information about Democratic candidates, including links to interviews and judicial Q&As, can be found on Erik Manning’s spreadsheet.

Judge Linda Dunson

1. Who are you and in which court do you preside?

I am Judge Linda Marie Dunson, and I am honored to serve as the Presiding Judge of the 309th Family District Court in Harris County, Texas. I have dedicated my legal career to serving families, protecting children, and ensuring that every person who enters my courtroom is treated with dignity, fairness, and respect. For me, being a judge is more than a position—it is a responsibility to administer justice with integrity, compassion, and fidelity to the law.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 309th Family District Court hears cases involving some of the most important and personal issues people will ever face. Those include divorce, child custody, child support, enforcement matters, protective orders, and cases involving the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services.

These cases involve real families at critical moments in their lives. The decisions made in family court can affect a child or family for many years, so I approach every case with careful attention to the law, the evidence, and the individual circumstances before me.

3. What have been your main accomplishments during your time on this bench?

One of my greatest accomplishments has been working to make the 309th Family District Court a courtroom that is efficient, accessible, fair, and responsive to the needs of families.

I am especially proud of our work in trauma-informed care. The 309th was selected as one of six Trauma-Informed Pilot Courts in Texas, and I have worked to bring greater awareness of trauma and its impact on children and families into the administration of justice.

I am also proud of our Annual Family Reunification Celebration, where we recognize families who have successfully navigated the child welfare system and have been reunited with their children. It reminds us that courts should not simply process cases—we should also recognize progress, accountability, healing, and successful outcomes.

Throughout my service, I have also emphasized professional development, collaboration with community partners, and maintaining a courtroom where people are heard and treated with dignity.

4. What do you hope to accomplish in your courtroom going forward?

Going forward, I want to continue building upon the progress we have made.

My goal is to make the 309th Family District Court even more efficient while never losing sight of the people behind every case number. I want to continue strengthening trauma-informed practices, improving outcomes for children and families, reducing unnecessary delays, and expanding collaboration with attorneys, agencies, and community partners.

I also want to continue looking for innovative ways to improve access to justice. Family court can be overwhelming, particularly for people who have never encountered the legal system before. A good court should be fair, understandable, efficient, and respectful.

Ultimately, I want the 309th to continue being a court where the law is followed, families are treated with dignity, and children remain at the center of the decisions that affect their futures.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is important because family courts touch the lives of thousands of Harris County families.

When people vote for a family court judge, they are choosing the person who may one day make decisions affecting their marriage, their children, their safety, or the future of their family.

Judicial elections matter. Experience matters. Temperament matters. Knowledge of the law matters. And having a judge who understands both the legal and human dimensions of family law matters tremendously.

The voters deserve judges who will be independent, fair, prepared, compassionate, and committed to equal justice under the law. That is why this race deserves their attention.

6. Why should people vote for you in November?

I believe the people of Harris County should vote for me because I have demonstrated the experience, leadership, temperament, and commitment necessary to serve effectively on this bench.

I know this court. I know family law. And I understand the tremendous responsibility that comes with making decisions that can shape the lives of children and families.

My record reflects innovation, professionalism, fairness, and a commitment to improving the administration of justice. But just as importantly, I have never forgotten that behind every case number is a person—and often a child—whose life will be affected by what happens in that courtroom.

I am asking the voters to allow me to continue the work we have begun: keeping families first, protecting the integrity of the court, and administering justice fairly and impartially.

I would be honored to earn their vote in November and to continue serving as Judge of the 309th Family District Court.

PREVIOUSLY:

Judge Damiane Dianne Curvey, 280th Family District Court
Judge M. Monica Singh, Harris County Civil Court at Law #4
Judge Cory Sepolio, 269th Civil District Court
Samantha Davis, 313th Juvenile District Court
Judge Melissa Morris, 263rd Criminal District Court
Judge Toria J. Finch, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #9

From the primaries:

Judge Kristen Hawkins, Supreme Court Justice, Place 7
Sarah Beth Landau, Chief Justice of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Judge Tanya Garrison, 157th Civil District Court
Julia Maldonado, 183rd Criminal District Court
Judge Brian Warren, 209th Criminal District Court
Judge Josh Hill, 232nd Criminal District Court
Judge Leah Shapiro, 315th Juvenile District Court
Judge James Horwitz, Harris County Probate Court #4
Ebony Williams, Harris County Civil Court at Law #2
Judge Andrew Wright, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #7

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Cook Political Report/TelevisaUnivision: Dems running strong with Latino voters in Texas

Good news.

A new survey of Texas Hispanic likely voters, conducted for The Cook Political Report and TelevisaUnivision, finds the Democratic candidates in the state’s Senate and gubernatorial contests leading their GOP opponents by a 2-1 margin with the key voting bloc, as President Donald Trump’s job approval rating in the state has sunk to just 33% with a demographic group that swung hard in his direction in 2024.

The poll, conducted August 26 —September 3 by Democratic firm Hart Research and Republican firm OnMessage Inc, also included an oversample of Hispanic voters in the Rio Grande Valley/South Texas, the centerpiece of Trump’s 2024 coalition and the home to three marquee House races (in TX-15, TX-28 and TX-34). In that subsample, Democrats enjoyed a 14 point advantage over Republicans, 53% to 39%, on the generic ballot.

Hispanic voters in Texas understand the important role they play in Texas elections. Seven in ten said they think Hispanics in the state have a lot or some political influence, including 41% who said they have “real political power” in Texas. Moreover, two-thirds said they’d like candidates to conduct outreach in the Hispanic community in Spanish, and 69% said they believe candidates signal that they “want to earn my vote” when they appear on Spanish-language media.

Democrats’ strong showing among Hispanics in the Lone Star state is a significant shift from 2024, when Trump carried Hispanic voters by 10 points and Republican Sen. Ted Cruz carried them by three.

In this cycle’s Senate contest, Democratic state Rep. James Talarico leads Republican Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton among Hispanic voters by 63% to 30%, including a whopping 73% of self-described independents.

And in her race against incumbent GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, who won 40% of Hispanics in 2022, Democratic state Rep. Gina Hinojosa leads among Hispanic voters, 60% to 33%.

Much of the shift in support to Democrats is driven by a fracturing of the coalition that supported Trump in 2024.

    18% of Texas Hispanics who voted for Trump in 2024 disapprove of the job he is doing.

  • 19% of Hispanic Trump voters say they support Talarico over Paxton.
  • 22% of Hispanic Trump voters do not support a Republican House candidate in a generic trial heat.
  • Just 60% of Hispanic Trump voters believe the Republican Party does a better job standing up for the Hispanic community, compared to 91% of Harris voters who believe that Democrats do a better job.

Full poll data, which includes a number of questions about issues, is here. This was just a sample of Latino voters, so there’s no statewide results. We’ve seen plenty of statewide polls in which Talarico and Hinojosa have not done as well with Latino voters as they did in this poll. That doesn’t mean this one is correct, but it is a larger sample than one gets in a general poll, so do bear it in mind. The voters from this sample went for Kamala Harris over Donald Trump in 2024 by a 48.4 to 40.9 margin. Link via G. Elliott Morris.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NHL expansion is “inevitable but not imminent”

That NHL team we’re waiting for could take awhile to arrive.

NHL expansion to Texas might be inevitable, but that doesn’t mean it’s imminent.

Deputy commissioner Bill Daly pumped the brakes on the notion of rapid league expansion Wednesday at the NHL/NHLPA player media tour in Las Vegas — talk Daly fueled at the European stop on the media tour in Munich on Aug. 22. Though the league has engaged in significant discussions with Houston billionaire Dan Friedkin about bringing a 33rd franchise to Houston or Austin, there are still a few hurdles to clear.

The first comes Sept. 22, when the NHL board of governors will weigh in.

“I don’t want to get ahead of the board,” Daly said Wednesday. “I don’t want to treat it like a done deal, because it’s not. It’s not a done deal on the Friedkin side, and it’s not a done deal on our side. And that’s why it’s kind of a nonbinding term sheet (agreed to with the league). We’re both going to work hard to achieve that goal. But at the end of the day, it might not happen.”

Another hurdle is that either city would need to build a new arena to attract an NHL expansion franchise. Toyota Center, home of the NBA’s Houston Rockets, isn’t an option for the new team. Neither is Moody Center, Austin’s 4-year-old multipurpose arena on the University of Texas campus. Arenas take time to plan and build, meaning Daly’s previously stated target of a 2029-30 season debut might be overly optimistic.

But Daly expressed little concern about that Wednesday.

“I don’t think there’s any magic about the date of entry,” Daly said. “If it’s not ’29-’30, it’ll be ’30-’31. I don’t think that’s going to be a prime gating factor.”

[…]

Between the two cities, Houston is the more likely landing spot for a new team. It’s the fourth-largest city in the United States, with a population of roughly 2.4 million. But the NHL has had success in mid-tier markets such as Raleigh, N.C., San Jose, Calif., Nashville, Tenn., and Las Vegas. Being the first major team to come to a city rather than entering a crowded market has its advantages. Austin would fall into that category.

“I’ve heard that, and I feel it, as well,” Daly said. “Austin, we’d be the first of the major four (leagues) to put a franchise there. And there’s some benefit to coming first. It’s an up-and-coming, growing city. Young, affluent — it has a lot going for it. But Houston is, like you said, enormous, and it is a major market that we’re not in. We don’t have the same footprint across the United States that the other major professional leagues do. So, to add a city of Houston’s size and demographics to our league, there would be certainly benefits associated with that.”

See here and here for some background. I’m not sure if the order of operations is “pick a city and then figure out where the arena will be built” or “pick a site where an arena will be built and that will determine the city”. Maybe we’ll know more after September 22. I’ll keep an eye on it.

Posted in Other sports | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Interview with Shaun Finnie

Shaun Finnie

We move now to Congress and the CD02 race where Shaun Finnie started out as an opponent to Rep. Dan Crenshaw, then had the Republican primary voters hand him Steve Toth instead. Finnie was raised on a family farm by a single mother but got to go to college and eventually got a law degree and an MBA. He worked as a lawyer in the oil and gas industry and then as an investment banker in that field. He’s put a lot of investment into this campaign, on tough turf in a good year against a terrible opponent. I’m aware of his recent comments about transgender people, which were made after we spoke, and I would encourage you to contact his campaign about it, after you listen to the interview.

Here’s the transcript, courtesy of Greg Wythe. I’ve got two more interviews this week, then on to the Legislature next week. Let me know what you think.

PREVIOUSLY:

Rep. Jon Rosenthal – Railroad Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Nathan Johnson – Attorney General – Transcript
Clayton Tucker – Ag Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt – Comptroller – Transcript
Commissioner Adrian Garcia – Harris County Commissioners Court, Precinct 2 – Transcript

From the primaries:

Leticia Gutierrez – CD09 – Transcript
Christian Menefee, CD18 (from the special election) – Transcript
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, CD29 – Transcript
Melissa McDonough – CD38 – Transcript
Justin Early, CD31 – Transcript

Staci Childs – HD131 – Transcript

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge – Transcript
Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney – Transcript
Traci Gibson, HCDP Chair – Transcript

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Q&A: Judge Toria J. Finch

(Note: As I have done in past elections, I am running a series of Q&As for Democratic judicial candidates. I ran a series of these for candidates in contested primaries, and now these are for the rest of the candidates. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. Much more information about Democratic candidates, including links to interviews and judicial Q&As, can be found on Erik Manning’s spreadsheet.

Judge Toria J. Finch

1. Who are you and in which court do you preside?

I am Judge Toria J. Finch, Presiding Judge of Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 9.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

This court hears Class A and Class B misdemeanor criminal cases, which carry a jurisdictional range of punishment of a fine up to $4,000 and/or up to one year in the Harris County jail, or both.

3. What have been your main accomplishments during your time on this bench?

My main accomplishments include serving in leadership roles as a Presiding and Co-Presiding Judge for the Harris County Criminal Courts at Law, and as the Local Administrative Judge for all twenty Harris County civil and criminal courts. In these roles, I am proud of the collaborative work we have accomplished—including laying the groundwork for meaningful misdemeanor bail reform; launching vital initiatives like the Managed Assigned Counsel Program, Open Hours Court, and Cite and Release Court; and expanding innovative programs like the B.A.Y.O.U. City Community Court’s Fresh Start Program and the P.A.C.E. Restorative Justice Initiative, to name a few. We have achieved all of this while successfully navigating unprecedented challenges, such as the pandemic and major facility disruptions, and steadily reducing case backlogs without compromising community safety.

4. What do you hope to accomplish in your courtroom going forward?

Going forward, my goal is to continue reducing the case backlog and maintaining efficient court management while ensuring Court No. 9 remains a place of truth, justice, fairness, and compassion for everyone who appears before us, regardless of socio-economic status, race, gender, or background while also incorporating more restorative justice programs.

5. Why is this race important?

This race is crucial because it decides the future direction of our county criminal courts at law, putting criminal justice reform, proven judicial experience, and active community engagement directly on the ballot.

6. Why should people vote for you in November?

Voters should support me and all Democratic Judges up and down the ballot because of our proven, substantive track record, and we are deeply committed to finishing the reforms we started, expanding our community programs, and protecting the progress we’ve worked so hard to achieve. We can’t afford to go back!

PREVIOUSLY:

Judge Damiane Dianne Curvey, 280th Family District Court
Judge M. Monica Singh, Harris County Civil Court at Law #4
Judge Cory Sepolio, 269th Civil District Court
Samantha Davis, 313th Juvenile District Court
Judge Melissa Morris, 263rd Criminal District Court

From the primaries:

Judge Kristen Hawkins, Supreme Court Justice, Place 7
Sarah Beth Landau, Chief Justice of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Judge Tanya Garrison, 157th Civil District Court
Julia Maldonado, 183rd Criminal District Court
Judge Brian Warren, 209th Criminal District Court
Judge Josh Hill, 232nd Criminal District Court
Judge Leah Shapiro, 315th Juvenile District Court
Judge James Horwitz, Harris County Probate Court #4
Ebony Williams, Harris County Civil Court at Law #2
Judge Andrew Wright, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #7

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Bo French roundup

Whether you tried to peacefully enjoy some college football this weekend – and as predicted there were too many ads for terrible candidates to avoid – or you tried your best to be sports-free, you probably couldn’t make it to Monday without hearing about this:

This cursed tweet and a million reactions to it were all over whatever form of social media you torment yourself with. As noted, some Republicans did condemn him in various ways, while others were notably absent or thoroughly bad-faithed. French of course basked in the attention because that’s who he is.

We don’t have the time to wallow through all that right now. There are two points of interest here, beyond the obvious. One is that this has also brought a lot of attention to Rep. Jon Rosenthal, as most of the repliers and quote-tweeters that I saw indicated their support for his candidacy, as well they should. Rosenthal had just gotten a nice interview with Inside Climate News:

Jon Rosenthal, a Democratic state representative from Houston, is facing off against Bo French, a far-right Republican culture warrior from Fort Worth, for a seat on the commission that regulates the oil and gas industry in Texas.

In an interview with Inside Climate News during a campaign visit to El Paso this month, Rosenthal shared his vision for the oil and gas regulatory agency and responded to French’s inflammatory attacks.

The Railroad Commission of Texas no longer regulates the state’s railroads and instead oversees the vast oil and gas industry, including pipelines, drilling permits, waste disposal and new programs like carbon capture and storage.

Rosenthal worked as a mechanical engineer in the oil and gas industry for 25 years. Following Donald Trump’s 2016 election, he ran for state representative and flipped a seat that had been held by Republicans for more than two decades. Rosenthal has served on the Energy Resources Committee throughout his nearly eight years in the Texas House.

French, the Republican nominee, stepped down as Tarrant County GOP chair to run for commissioner, defeating incumbent Jim Wright in the May 2026 primary run-off. He was raised in Midland in the heart of the gas- and oil-rich Permian Basin, and his family has oil and gas holdings. French spent his career as a trader and more recently in politics. His social media is filled with calls to deport 100 million people and ban “Sharia law” in Texas.

Rosenthal, the only Jewish member of the Texas House, told Inside Climate News he is compelled to speak out against “bigotry and discrimination” and unite with Texans of all backgrounds.

Inside Climate News reached out to French for comment on Rosenthal’s criticism of what he called anti-semitism and Islamophobia in French’s campaign materials. French did not respond.

The Railroad Commission’s three members, all Republicans, serve staggered six year terms. Wayne Christian and Chairman Christi Craddick’s terms run through 2028 and 2030, respectively. The general election race to fill Wright’s seat between Rosenthal and French is on Nov. 3.

You can also of course listen to my interview with Rep. Rosenthal. Note that this story published on September 11, two days before this particular French tweet. You could have published it basically any time and had something recent and vile that he had said to refer to.

The other point is how this derails other messages that Republicans would like to push while putting them all on the spot. Here’s the editorial page take, which praises the Republicans who did say something and then turned to the rest of them:

That’s a good start. Here’s the next step: Republicans need to tell their voters not to support French for railroad commissioner. This wasn’t an isolated incident. French has a long history of racism and it isn’t going to stop unless voters make sure he loses.

If George H.W. Bush could endorse Democratic candidate Edwin Edwards against former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke in the race for Louisiana governor, then today’s Republicans should be bold enough to at least tell their base to skip over French’s name. Republicans don’t even have to go as far as Hawk Dunlap, who lost in the GOP primary against French and endorsed the Democratic candidate Jon Rosenthal. Just say no to Bo.

Republicans had the opportunity to shut him down in their primary, much like how Texas Democrats rejected the antisemitic Maureen Galindo in the primary for the 35th Congressional District. Gov. Greg Abbott campaigned for the incumbent, Jim Wright. But Republicans still failed. Now the fight against French’s bigotry has made it to the general ballot.

You could say this is one of those “do right and risk consequences” moments that Sam Houston once described, but the reality is that the policy consequences for Republicans are quite minimal. Even if Rosenthal wins, Republicans will still have a two-vote majority on the three-member Railroad Commission. Conservatives will still largely get their way no matter what. And Rosenthal will bring the useful perspective of an experienced oil and gas engineer.

The bar for political courage here is very, very low. And yet many Republican candidates we’ve met during endorsement screenings have failed to meet it. Perhaps this moment will convince them to finally speak up.

If they don’t, Republicans risk the consequence of having to answer questions about why they elected an unrepentant racist to office. And the risk for all of us is that we’ll have a railroad commissioner who, as Gov. Greg Abbott said during the primary, “doesn’t know anything about oil and gas” and would “wreck” the industry. That we’ll have a man in power who doesn’t want Texas to win if he doesn’t like the color of the fans’ skin.

Since then, Abbott has endorsed French. So has Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who once said French engaged in “[a]ntisemitism and religious bigotry.” For those wondering, Attorney General Ken Paxton backed French in the GOP primary.

The Longhorns put up a hard fight to win on Saturday. Republicans’ battle against the racists in their own party should be an easy one — but with the way things are going, don’t be surprised if they choke.

Robert Downen made the same point about this race being more or less meaningless to the Republicans, versus having to deal with this guy as an elected official. But of course they’ve known about him for a long time and taken minimal action to try and stop him. And there’s also a the bigger picture here, which is being held aloft by many very dirty hands:

Lone Star Left brings a longer list of receipts. The Observer notes that a non-trivial number of elected Republicans (and other prominent figures) proudly stood with French. This is where we are. As repulsive as it all is, I’m glad it was made clear to as many people as possible.

UPDATE: One other feature from social media was journalists asking people who were in that picture to contact them and talk about their experience. Here’s two of them talking to the DMN.

Dhairya Gupta and his friends arrived at Darrell K Royal-Texas Memorial Stadium on Saturday wearing orange, hoping for an upset.

The Longhorns squeaked out a victory against top-ranked Ohio State with a thrilling fourth-quarter comeback. The camera cut to Gupta and his friends after the go-ahead touchdown. Gupta, his arms outstretched to the sky as he flashed the “Hook ‘em” sign with both hands, grinned for all to see. To his right was Rahul Kodali, a friend since the first day of freshman year, his face frozen in apparent disbelief. Kodali lost his voice that night. Gupta went home to watch the highlights.

Saturday was a blast.

Then came Sunday morning.

A man Gupta had never heard of, Bo French, was trending on X after singling out a photo of Gupta, Kodali and other Texas students celebrating. French said the photo, largely depicting men with brown skin, illustrated a problem at the university.

“It was just us having some enjoyment,” Gupta, 21, said in a phone interview Sunday. “And now it’s just people being blatantly racist toward us.”

[…]

While Gupta and Kodali are of South Asian descent, both said they are U.S. citizens. Gupta is an immigrant from India who moved to the U.S. when he was about 5 years old and gained citizenship in his childhood, he said. Kodali, his friend, was born in Syracuse, New York. His family moved to the Dallas area when he was a toddler. He graduated from Flower Mound High School in Denton County and receives in-state tuition.

“Whether or not we are immigrants, that doesn’t change anything,” Kodali, 21, said. “I’ve been an American my entire life.”

[…]

Gupta, a senior and computer science major, picked UT because he believed it was a great school with a thriving athletics department located in a major city that keeps growing. He met Kodali his first day of school as a freshman, and they bonded over their love of the English soccer team Chelsea.

Gupta enjoyed the diversity of the student body.

“Texas is broad enough that you really get to meet people of all different types,” he said. “I’ve gotten opportunities here that I wouldn’t necessarily get elsewhere.”

In the last few years, that kind of diversity has been attacked. And throughout the 2026 campaign, French has been at the forefront of those attacks as he’s repeatedly spoken out against diversity, equity and inclusion policies.

Gupta said racism has risen within the last 10 years — since President Donald Trump’s first campaign in 2016. He’s seen blanket racist statements before, he said, but he had difficulty describing racism being “directly applied to us.”

“I’d never seen this in lower-level elections, and then seeing this happen right now, just from an innocent moment at a football game at the state’s university, I just thought it was surprising that people are going out of their way to be racist on that,” he said.

He also became concerned when he realized French is seeking elected office, which gives him a platform.

“They have people voting for them, and they’re not scared to say this kind of thing,” Gupta said. “It’s becoming to the point where this kind of racism just isn’t looked down upon as much as it used to be — or it feels like that.”

Kodali, who is also a senior and computer science major, took issue with some posts seeming to defend him and other students as assimilating into American culture by attending a UT football game and wearing cowboy hats or cowboys boots.

“I’m going to the games because I like the team,” he said. “I’m not doing it for this old noble cause.”

Asked if there’s anything either would like to say to French if they met him, Kodali said there’s nothing he could say “that could knock a dent in a person that talks like that.”

Gupta said he would tell French that being an immigrant doesn’t mean UT’s culture will shift one way or another.

“We have a different color in our skin, we might speak different languages, but at the end of the day, all of us are still going to the same university,” Gupta said. “We’re still standing behind the same team.”

Gupta also spoke to the Houston Chronicle, and I’m sure others will have their say as well. (He and a couple of others also spoke to the Trib.) I’m with Kodali on not having anything to say to Bo French. There’s no point, and he doesn’t deserve whatever grace one may have in trying to reach him.

UPDATE: Holy cow.

Karl Rove, former adviser to President George W. Bush and longtime Texas GOP political consultant, said he will vote for Jon Rosenthal, a Houston Democrat running to serve the Texas Railroad Commission, after Republican Bo French posted racist comments on Sunday about South Asian students at the University of Texas at Austin.

Rove made the comments at a members-only lunch event at the Headliners Club in Austin, where he called French a “bigot,” according to three attendees to whom The Texas Tribune has granted anonymity to discuss the conversation.

Rove said he has only ever voted for one Democratic candidate, Texas Lt. Gov. Bob Bullock, who was up for reelection in 1994.

I need to go check and see if rivers are running uphill. Apparently, Rove is now teaching grad students at the UT school of public affairs. Never ever thought I’d say these words, but I hope a lot of Republicans listen to what Karl Rove is saying here.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Interview with Commissioner Adrian Garcia

Adrian Garcia

We’re going to start the second week of interviews with a very familiar face, that of two-term County Commissioner Adrian Garcia, from Precinct 2. You know his story by now: He served three terms as Houston City Council member in District H, with his first election in 2003. He was then elected Sheriff, by a large margin, in 2008 and served until 2015 when he made an unsuccessful run for Mayor. After an unsuccessful primary challenge to US Rep. Gene Green in 2016, he returned to county politics by knocking off two-term Commissioner Jack Morman in 2018. I spoke to him most recently for that 2022 re-election campaign, which you can find here. As is always the case, there’s a lot to talk about and we could have kept on going, but I think I hit the highlights. Here’s our conversation:

Here’s the transcript, courtesy as always of Greg Wythe. I’ve got a mix of different interviews this week, and will move on to the Legislature next week. Let me know what you think.

PREVIOUSLY:

Rep. Jon Rosenthal – Railroad Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Nathan Johnson – Attorney General – Transcript
Clayton Tucker – Ag Commissioner – Transcript
Sen. Sarah Eckhardt – Comptroller – Transcript

From the primaries:

Leticia Gutierrez – CD09 – Transcript
Christian Menefee, CD18 (from the special election) – Transcript
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, CD29 – Transcript
Melissa McDonough – CD38 – Transcript
Justin Early, CD31 – Transcript

Staci Childs – HD131 – Transcript

Letitia Plummer – Harris County Judge – Transcript
Abbie Kamin – Harris County Attorney – Transcript
Traci Gibson, HCDP Chair – Transcript

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Judicial Q&A: Judge Melissa Morris

(Note: As I have done in past elections, I am running a series of Q&As for Democratic judicial candidates. I ran a series of these for candidates in contested primaries, and now these are for the rest of the candidates. I am running these responses in the order that I receive them from the candidates. Much more information about Democratic candidates, including links to interviews and judicial Q&As, can be found on Erik Manning’s spreadsheet.

Judge Melissa Morris

1. Who are you and in which court do you preside?

I’m Judge Melissa Morris, presiding judge of the 263rd District Court in Harris County, Texas.

2. What kind of cases does this court hear?

The 263rd is a criminal district court. We hear felony criminal cases including low level drug offenses to violent crimes like capital murder that are charged in the Harris County criminal justice system.

3. What have been your main accomplishments during your time on this bench?

During my time on the 263rd, I’ve focused on strengthening access to justice and court efficiency. I chaired the court’s Indigent Defense Committee and took on the role of Defense Liaison to support representation for those who can’t afford an attorney. I’ve also worked to improve docket management, including remote appearance options and participation in early resolution efforts, to help cases move efficiently through the system. Those efforts reduced my docket from approximately 2100 cases to approximately 770. Alongside that, I’ve built an internship and mentorship program that brings law and college students into the court each summer which ends in a mock trial competition I started and co-direct with two other judges.

4. What do you hope to accomplish in your courtroom going forward?

I’m committed to running an efficient, well-managed court and continuing to expand access to justice for everyone who comes before it, including making sure indigent defendants have adequate representation, treating lawyers with professional courtesy and respect as well as ensuring the promise of equal protection under the law for all who are affected by my decisions. I also plan to keep growing our internship and mentorship program so more students see a path into the legal profession. I intend to continue executing a partnership between my Alma Maters Prairie View A&M University and Thurgood Marshall School of Law to support students in an accelerated transition from undergrad into law school along with a classmate and fellow jurist.

5. Why is this race important?

Judicial elections determine who administers justice in Harris County. How courts are run, how efficiently cases move, and whether every person who comes before the court is treated fairly and given individualized consideration is paramount to community safety and democracy as a whole.. It’s a role that touches thousands of lives each year, which is why voters should pay attention to judicial races, not just the top of the ticket.

6. Why should people vote for you in November?

I bring 16 years of criminal defense experience to the bench, along with a demonstrated record of expanding access to justice and running an efficient courtroom. I apply the law fairly, rule decisively, speak respectfully, and study the law consistently. I make the decisions the law dictates without regard for personal feelings, political blow back or outside influence. I’d be honored to continue that work for another term.

PREVIOUSLY:

Judge Damiane Dianne Curvey, 280th Family District Court
Judge M. Monica Singh, Harris County Civil Court at Law #4
Judge Cory Sepolio, 269th Civil District Court
Samantha Davis, 313th Juvenile District Court

From the primaries:

Judge Kristen Hawkins, Supreme Court Justice, Place 7
Sarah Beth Landau, Chief Justice of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Judge Tanya Garrison, 157th Civil District Court
Julia Maldonado, 183rd Criminal District Court
Judge Brian Warren, 209th Criminal District Court
Judge Josh Hill, 232nd Criminal District Court
Judge Leah Shapiro, 315th Juvenile District Court
Judge James Horwitz, Harris County Probate Court #4
Ebony Williams, Harris County Civil Court at Law #2
Judge Andrew Wright, Harris County Criminal Court at Law #7

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Why did HPD change its policy on officer-involved shootings?

I don’t get it.

More than a year before a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in east Houston, Mayor John Whitmire’s administration quietly changed a decades-old policy that required Houston Police Department detectives to investigate every officer-involved shooting within city limits, regardless of which agency those officers work for.

Since at least the 1990s, HPD officers have responded to these shootings, collecting evidence at the scene and coordinating interviews of witnesses and the officers involved, according to experts and past presentations to Houston City Council. In early 2025, however, Houston Police Chief Noe Diaz changed course and started deferring to the law enforcement agency responsible for the shooting.

Instead of automatically responding, now HPD treats each shooting on a case-by-case basis, Diaz said. They opted not to respond when they were notified about Salgado’s shooting.

The change came roughly a month after President Donald Trump assumed office for a second term, promising dramatically expanded immigration enforcement. In January 2025, his administration began pulling grants from cities and law enforcement agencies it said were not ideologically aligned with its priorities.

Diaz said Trump’s administration and its positioning on grants had nothing to do with the agency’s decision.

As a result of the policy change, HPD investigators did not respond to the scene when an ICE agent shot and killed Salgado in July. Instead, representatives with the district attorney’s office were the first local investigators to the scene, a day later, losing precious hours to collect their own evidence and testimony before federal authorities consolidated control.

[…]

In an interview, Diaz said he reversed the policy around February 2025 because past HPD investigations were often futile, with federal officials stonewalling detectives and refusing to give them access to the scene and the evidence that comes with it. As a result, he said, those local investigations merely echoed the conclusion of federal investigators.

“Most of the time, the police department was just kind of standing around and not getting the information they actually needed to investigate,” Diaz said. “I need to have access to the evidence. I need to have access to see if there’s any videos involved. And when you don’t have access to this, we’re just in a holding pattern in the hopes that later they share information with us.”

Brian Harris, a retired HPD homicide investigator who taught classes on how to respond to officer-involved shootings until 2016, said Diaz is right that federal agencies frequently made it hard for local investigators to question agents. Still, Harris said, there simply cannot be a homicide investigation if local authorities do not respond.

“Are the feds equipped to do that investigation?” Harris said. “Are they the agency regularly investigating homicides and murders? No. Even when the FBI is called in on a murder case, it’s always for some specialty purpose – their behavioral unit, or for their technology.”

Local investigators could still collect evidence, even if they were slowed from questioning witnesses, Harris said.

“Go and ask the DA or anyone else who they’d rather investigate homicides in the city of Houston – trained homicide investigators from the city or county, or a random FBI or DEA agent?” Harris said.

[…]

In 2017, former HPD Chief Art Acevedo created a specialized unit to handle these calls, according to a presentation to city council. The team included two lieutenants, four sergeants and 16 officers tasked with investigating allegations of misconduct by HPD employees and any sworn peace officers whose offense occurred in the city of Houston.

Those officers would “automatically” respond to and investigate all shootings or uses of force within HPD’s jurisdiction, according to Harris, who said that policy was in place since at least the 1990s.

Records from the time show relatively few cases between 2017 and 2020, peaking at 11 such shootings in 2018. None of the investigations resulted in charges filed against the officer.

An earlier statement from HPD said another rationale for the change was to reduce “duplicated efforts.” Harris said those investigations have always been a tiny fraction of the homicide division’s caseload, which has only gotten smaller in recent years as homicides have declined and other responsibilities, such as investigating assaults and gang violence, have moved to other divisions.

While federal authorities frequently keep investigators from immediately speaking with agents, there is still utility to a quick response, Harris argued, because any delay means videos might get deleted, shell casings might get buried underfoot or fingerprints might be washed away in the rain.

No other agency is better equipped to handle the role of investigating the shooting than HPD, Harris said. While federal authorities might be good at filing complex warrants or tracking down international criminal organizations, they have little experience with homicides.

Still, Diaz argued there is little utility in sending officers to wait on the sidelines.

“I think I have the finest team in the state to be frank with you,” he said, “and they’re capable of doing anything here, but if our federal partners decide, ‘Hey you can’t come on the scene,’ or they don’t call us, or they call us and say, ‘We have this one, we don’t need your help,’ that’s where we’re at with these investigations.”

There’s more and it’s a gift link, so read the rest. I would have been deeply annoyed if the reason for this had been standard Trump administration bullying nonsense, but I would have at least understood the motivation. The actual motivation seems to be a desire to not waste time and resources on investigations that have universally been futile. I do get that, but the volume is small and the importance of each case is high, so it seems misguided to me. At the very least, I don’t get why HPD would be content with letting other agencies, ones they clearly see as being less able to do this job, do what they do in their place. Just for the pride of it, I don’t understand why they’d let this go. And while we may never get a resolution in this incident regardless of how it plays or might have played out, we’ll also now never know for sure what we could have discovered had this been properly investigated from the jump. That feels very wrong to me.

Posted in Crime and Punishment | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can Austin ISD avoid being taken over?

Maybe. This one trick might help.

In an effort to keep the Austin school district independent, Mayor Kirk Watson is pushing to close two chronically-failing middle schools that triggered the state’s takeover law. He’ll need parents’ help to do it.

Watson’s plan, released in his newsletter Wednesday morning, cites a little-known state rule that would give weight to a parent petition asking for the schools’ closure.

Last month, both Webb and Burnet middle schools received preliminary fifth failing accountability ratings from the Texas Education Agency for the 2025-26 school year, triggering state intervention that could close the schools or see a board of managers replace the elected school board. Austin ISD has until Sept. 11 to appeal the preliminary ratings, but if either rating becomes final the state is mandated under law to intervene. The manner of intervention is up to Education Commissioner Mike Morath.

However, Watson cites a caveat in the state education code which mandates Morath follow the will of a parent petition submitted to TEA if the parents of a majority of enrolled students request closure of the schools instead of a district-wide takeover. The plan comes at a high-stakes moment for Austin ISD. TEA declined the district’s plan to avoid takeover by surrendering control of three failing schools to an external operator earlier this year. Watson told Austin Current he remained optimistic that takeover was not the only option left for Austin ISD and was in frequent talks with Austin ISD leadership over potential outcomes.

“Texas law gives the parents at Webb and Burnet a powerful voice,” Watson’s statement said Wednesday. “That gives this community a path to act instead of simply waiting for something to happen to us. It gives families most impacted a say in what comes next.”

A parent petition to close the schools instead of taking over the district would have to be signed by the parents of the majority of students enrolled at each failing school and submitted to Superintendent Matias Segura for validation by Oct. 15. Segura would then have to submit a validated copy to Morath no later than Dec. 1. Morath would be obligated by law to order the action requested by the parents.

If Austin ISD’s board of trustees presents a written request to the commissioner opposing the parent petition, the commissioner could choose to side with the board.

See here for the previous update. That’s the key, this has to come from the parents of the schools in question and not the Austin ISD Board of Trustees. I’ll quote from the Watson Wire email about a key detail.

There’s a path worth pursuing short of the state replacing the elected leadership of an entire school district serving roughly 70,000 children.

And, make no mistake, if the state takes over the district, we can reasonably expect that Webb, Burnet, and other district campuses will be closed.

Texas law gives the parents at Webb and Burnet a powerful voice. If a majority of parents petition for closure, the Commissioner must close the campuses rather than replace AISD’s elected board.

That gives this community a path to act instead of simply waiting for something to happen to us. It gives the families most impacted a say in what comes next.

And Austin has an opportunity to do this without breaking these school communities apart.

A brand-new $158 million, state of the art, building is going up right now at Burnet Middle School’s existing site.

Superintendent Segura’s past work gives me confidence that he would develop an ambitious plan that refuses to disperse students from struggling campuses among existing middle schools. I trust him, with the support of the elected board, to create a new school in a brand-new facility that keeps each school community together.

And I believe he will listen to the families and work with the community to fundamentally rethink what surrounds those students and families: academic interventions, exceptional teachers and leadership, mental-health and family support, extended learning opportunities, community partnerships and dedicated support services.

We can expect him to include whatever the evidence tells us these children need to succeed, and we can expect him to listen to the parents most impacted.

Then I think Commissioner Morath should give this plan and the districtwide reforms already underway the time to demonstrate results.

We’re not asking the state to suspend accountability. We’re asking the state to let results determine what happens next.

I think the key to maybe getting parents on board is the assertion that these schools, plus some others, will be closed anyway in a taken-over Austin ISD. If that’s the case, then at least this approach will maintain local control over the district and a chance to rebuild those schools in a better and more sustainable way. I’d at least be open to the pitch if I were a Webb or Burnet parent.

But I’m not, and I have no idea if this will catch on, or if it could be done in a timely fashion. I like that Mayor Watson is at least looking at all the options and not just giving in. It would have been nice to have known about this in HISD a couple of years ago, whether or not that path would have been taken. Too late now, and maybe too late for AISD, but perhaps other districts may benefit some day. Good luck, y’all.

Posted in School days | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Weekend link dump for September 13

“The monstrosity would still be an ugly appendage that wrecks the symmetry of the historic White House. But over time, we’d grow accustomed to having a multi-purpose venue that serves the needs of both the president and the capital. As part of recovering from this sordid era, we’d turn a monument to Trump’s ego into a symbol of community and the importance of recreation.”

“We know food doesn’t look like this. The restaurant and café owners know that they’ve never cooked anything that remotely resembles the output of Midjourney. And yet we’re told this is the new normal. AI is here to stay so just order your dinner and avoid the queasiness these images induce.”

“The new reporting is the latest illustration of the Court’s fear of public scrutiny. Access to the justices’ papers would help the public understand what the Court is doing and how the Court really works. That knowledge is a prerequisite for holding the Court accountable. Roberts wants the justices to take that knowledge to their graves so that he can bury the prospect of accountability along with them.”

This is pure enshittification. Of all the ingenious, innovative ways that Amazon came up with to make money, the most successful is a scam that makes everything you buy more expensive even as it reduces the profits of the companies you’re buying from. It’s another example of corruption: a system of concentrated gains and diffuse losses – and once again, it’s the most profitable thing Amazon does. And then…Amazon made it worse.”

“Disney is bringing more of Rick Riordan‘s expansive mythological universe to life. A live-action series adaptation of The Kane Chronicles is currently in development at Disney+.”

“It is a little sad. We’ve just come through this pandemic where 20 million people died. And what’s our response? We’re going to shut down work on viruses. That doesn’t really compute.”

“Nobody ever criticized my work, ever. They just criticized me.”

“In the realm of Christian theology, I might suggest putting it this way: “Never attribute to sin that which is adequately explained by finitude.” I think this helps us to perceive our human neighbors more accurately but also to regard them more graciously and more gracefully, in every sense. (Freely you have received, freely give.)”

“This just feels so comfortable, so home. This is home.”

“Rule of thumb: It’s a bad thing when you notice an umpire during a game, and Doug Eddings made sure he was noticed [last] Friday night at Coors Field.

“That’s the one bit of trouble with Ivanka Trump’s little project: The people of Albania are very, very angry about it. The development has provoked fury all summer and sparked the biggest outbreak of civil unrest since communism collapsed in the country 35 years ago, in what has now been dubbed, relevantly, the Flamingo Revolution. Even the European Union has gotten involved, and not on the side of the trailblazing couple. The world has never seen a movement quite like this.”

“Congrats, you cut the cord. Now you have six more cords. Streaming prices are rising three times as fast as inflation, making escaping cable company greed now seem quaint.”

“A swarm of rogue OpenAI agents hijacked a German website this spring and transformed it into a bulletin board for other AI agents, according to ​new research published Friday and two people familiar with the matter.”

“The Woman Profiting Off the WNBA’s Trans Panic”. Anytime there’s a panic, there will be grift.

“For now, the anti-abortion activists at the tip of the spear are trying to run back 2024’s failed effort again, this time in a slightly different outfit. If Wednesday’s case, Louisiana v. FDA, makes its way up to the Supreme Court, the justices will again face an effort to restrict mifepristone for blue states as well as red ones, premised on the wobbliest of injuries.”

“Today marks a full year that the Trump administration has used military aircraft and weapons to destroy suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing hundreds of alleged traffickers to date. Officials portray these strikes as a tougher approach to combating narcotics trafficking. In reality, they represent something far more troubling: an unlawful expansion of military force into what has long been—and should remain—a law enforcement mission.”

“At 74, he rarely gives interviews. But when Mr T decides to talk, he really does talk. What Mr T thinks, Mr T says. And I’ve never heard anyone trash the very thing they’re here to promote quite like Mr T does today.” Also, too, today I learned that Mr. T attended Prairie View A&M and was a math major, until he was expelled for participating in a student protest.

“I think that is what I feel most acutely: That maybe that’s possible. That maybe a collection of documentary evidence and human sources who are brave enough to talk to a journalist, and months of research that have been vetted legally and otherwise, can combine to create something like consequences at a time at which those extraordinarily wealthy people seem to be able to avoid them.”

“What’s noticeable by its absence is photographic documentation of people who are not scientifically inclined visiting scientific places. You don’t regularly see adults traveling without children going to a natural history museum, let alone a science museum. Even zoos and aquariums are not common destinations for adult tourists.”

“Whose job was it to make sure all the clocks were on the same page? Whose job was it to tell the video reviewers that they were grading off the wrong rubric? Was that actually their job, anyway, given that the protocol wasn’t written out? Should the Big Ten commissioner have stepped in to prevent Western Michigan from getting screwed? That’s probably the best place to land, but then again, his job is to negotiate TV deals and pervert the College Football Playoff into a 24-team monstrosity, not to be the master of rules minutiae that aren’t even written down.”

RIP, Barry Melrose, former NHL player, coach, and TV analyst.

If you want to see James Talarico talk to Jimmy Kimmel, you’ll have to find it on YouTube.

“Your Deadbeat President Is Never Giving You $5,000″.

“This may be the do-nothingest Congress in generations. But it produced a bumper crop of scandals.”

“At this point it may seem absurd to analyze any of Trump’s lies, as he delivers them reflexively and without caring, apparently, whether they are believable. But it’s worth a minute to examine this one.”

“It’s incredibly ironic that ESPN would give an unopposed platform to a Republican senator from Texas to talk about politics in the very same week when ABC cowered away from airing a Jimmy Kimmel interview with a Democratic Senate candidate, James Talarico, and was forced to air it on YouTube thanks to threats from the federal government.”

Posted in Blog stuff | Tagged | 5 Comments

SCOTx blocks use of Galveston post-primary redistricting map

Hallelujah.

The Texas Supreme Court on Friday prohibited Galveston County from using new voting boundaries for the November general election, ruling county leaders improperly redrew district lines after the primaries.

State law requires “the conduct of elections be uniform and consistent throughout this state,” the court said in an unsigned opinion that directed Galveston County to use the same precinct maps from the March primary election.

The court rejected Galveston County’s argument that the state law giving commissioners the power to redraw precinct lines “from time to time” means they can decide when to do so.

“The County has identified no historical precedent for a Texas county taking such action, and it has not identified any valid source of legal authority for its action,” the court said.

“Recognizing that commissioners courts may make such changes more often than every ten years to ‘meet the changing needs of the people’ does not broadly empower commissioners courts to take redistricting actions contrary to the ‘uniform and consistent’ statutory structure of elections,” the court said.

[…]

Galveston County Judge Mark Henry told the Houston Chronicle earlier this year that the mid-election cycle redistricting was done to align precincts for the “most efficient and beneficial setup,” helping keep the county Republican.

But the Texas Supreme Court said redrawing political boundaries during an ongoing election raises “serious constitutional concerns.”

“A primary election and the corresponding general election are one election for purposes of this principle, which we consider to be foundational to the electoral structure prescribed by our Election Code,” Friday’s ruling said.

Galveston County can use the newly drawn maps after the November election, the court said, but separate lawsuits are pending to prevent the new lines from being enforced.

See here and here for the background. It’s hard to analyze these stories without going full “I feel like I’m taking crazy pills” because it’s so stupidly obvious that Galveston County was acting in bad faith, based on a risible reading of the law in question. While there were some worries about a lack of timely action from SCOTx on this, I am glad to see that in the end they gave Galveston County Commissioners Court the dismissive you-must-think-we’re-idiots ruling it deserved. We can have a proper fight over what map they should be using for 2028 after this election. Having the November election with the same map used in March is more than enough for now. The Chron and Texas Public Radio have more.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

No, I don’t think Chris Hollins is running for Mayor next year

Not based on this, anyway.

Chris Hollins

City Controller Chris Hollins sent the strongest signal yet on Wednesday that he could launch a challenge against Houston Mayor John Whitmire’s bid for a second term in 2027.

Hollins, the city’s second-highest-ranking elected official, swiped at Whitmire during remarks at a press event in Dallas, where he appeared with Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker as part of Democrats’ pushback against the ongoing midterm Republican National Convention.

While much of Hollins’ short speech was aimed at boosting statewide Democratic candidates, including James Talarico and Gina Hinojosa, he named Whitmire, who he has long clashed with over city finances and other issues, on a list of officials he hoped would be soon unseated.

“We have folks who will do anything that they can to be the lapdog or the doormat of this demented, incompetent tyrant,” Hollins said, referring to President Donald Trump. “We’re stuck for now, for just a couple more days, with Greg Abbott, with Ken Paxton.

“We’re stuck for a little bit longer with Ted Cruz, with (Dallas Mayor) Eric Johnson, with John Whitmire,” Hollins continued. “But the day for change is coming.”

Hollins did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday. In a statement, Whitmire called the controller’s remarks “silly politics that I do not have time for.”

I say that I don’t believe Hollins is running for Mayor in 2027 for the simple reason that he’s not been raising money like someone who wants to run for Mayor in that short timeframe. CM Ed Pollard is clearly running for Mayor, and I believe Controller Hollins very reasonably thinks that there isn’t enough room for a third candidate. I also believe that maybe a day after the 2027 Mayoral election is concluded, with Mayor Whitmire very likely being elected to a second term, Hollins very reasonably thinks he will be christened as The Frontrunner for 2031, for a multitude of obvious reasons. And, again very reasonably, he thinks his odds will be better in 2031 in an open field against however many as-yet unknowns (sorry, but even I have no interest in speculating about who else could be running at this time) than they would next year against Mayor Whitmire, who is (until proven otherwise) still broadly popular even if the people who dislike him do so with a much greater fervor now than they did initially.

That’s how I see it, anyway. Hollins could of course prove me wrong anytime. Until then, I think this was just a bit of sniping, not even really escalatory in my view. Make of it what you will.

Posted in Election 2027 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Of course the maternal mortality study will be delayed

Can’t have information that may make Republicans look bad come out before the election, now can we?

Health officials say they need more time to complete a report on maternal deaths — likely punting the fullest accounting of pregnancy-related deaths since the state’s abortion ban took effect until after the midterms.

The biennial report has historically been released on Sept. 1, but lawmakers were informed last week that it would not be completed by then. The Department of State Health Services said the report will be finished by Dec. 1 under a new deadline the state Legislature approved last year.

Advocates and Democrats say that will give lawmakers little time to craft bills for the next legislative session, which starts in January — and it will likely keep voters in the dark ahead of the high-stakes midterms.

The Texas House Women’s Health Caucus wrote to acting health commissioner Imelda Garcia on Wednesday urging her to release the findings sooner.

“The Department knows that releasing this report by September 1 is essential to the Legislature’s ability to act,” state Rep. Ann Johnson, a Houston Democrat, said in a statement. “Any further delay is not merely bureaucratic; it is an unconscionable dereliction of duty to Texas mothers and families.”

Democrats say the timing is suspicious, given the Dec. 1 deadline is after Gov. Greg Abbott and other Republicans who supported the state’s abortion ban are up for reelection.

[…]

The women’s health caucus letter says the delay is “particularly disturbing” because lawmakers last session voted to eliminate redaction requirements that the committee had said previously slowed its work.

Minutes from the committee’s December meeting show it was on track to complete the report by Sept. 1. The minutes say the committee was set to finish reviewing 2024 cases by this May.

Nakeenya Wilson, a former member of the committee, said there is no obvious reason the committee would need more time. In the past, reports have been amended after publication to meet the Sept. 1 deadline.

“I don’t need to speculate about motive to know that Texans deserve an answer,” Wilson said. “DSHS told us in December that this report would be published by Sept. 1. They laid out a work plan that had case review ending in May and recommendations being completed in June. So what changed? What work remains? And why should Texans have to wait until after they elect a governor to see findings about preventable maternal deaths?”

The story refers to the report from 2022 and which contained data for 2018 through 2020, which was also delayed until December, also in a year where Greg Abbott was on the ballot. It was in December of 2024 that the committee announced that it would finally include 2022 and 2023 data, for the report this year. Not sure why this is called a “biennial” report when it either didn’t happen in 2024 or didn’t include any more recent data than the one two years before it, but here we are. We do already know of at least three deaths that can be directly blamed on the ban, plus plenty of near misses and cases of sepsis. Will any of that be in the report? We’ll have to wait until December to see. Daily Kos has more.

Posted in The great state of Texas | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Surrogate denied custody, appeals to SCOTUS

A correct ruling, in my opinion.

A Texas judge has ruled against an Alaskan surrogate in her bid to obtain custody over a medically fragile baby she birthed in Dallas.

According to a Wednesday filing, attorneys for the surrogate McKenna West are now asking the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene after Texas’ unfavorable decision.

“A stay is needed to preserve the status quo and ensure M.W. (McKenna West) can advocate for her rights and remain informed about Baby G. during this critical time in his young life,” the filing stated.

The high-profile, multi-state dispute landed in Dallas last month after West flew to Texas, which bans abortion, to seek sole conservatorship over the child. She said she wanted custody so she could make medical decisions for the child instead of the biological parents Omar Ahmed and Nausheen Gilkar. She also accused Ahmed and Gilkar, who are from California, of pressuring her into getting an abortion because the fetus has a condition where the left side of his heart is severely underdeveloped.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened and state District Judge Ashley Wysocki, a recent Gov. Greg Abbott appointee, ordered two Dallas hospitals to provide care and that the baby remain in Texas until a final decision could be made about West’s conservatorship case.

After West gave birth on Aug. 12, Ahmed and Gilkar, who named the child Rumi, obtained a restraining order barring her from seeing or holding the child. At a subsequent Dallas court hearing, they did not deny they at one time considered abortion after learning the child was diagnosed with an underdeveloped heart, preventing normal blood flow. But, they said they eventually decided the pregnancy should proceed.

They informed Wysocki that their dispute with West escalated after they tried to get West to come to California to meet with medical experts to devise a plan for Rumi’s medical care.

Wysocki’s decision last week is not publicly available because the entire case has been sealed, a clerk for the judge informed The Texas Tribune. Neither the legal team for West nor the one representing the parents immediately returned emailed requests for comment.

However, within West’s appeal on Wednesday are details that the Dallas court eventually ruled against her on Sept. 2 in her fight for sole conservatorship over the baby she calls Gabriel. The judge — apparently deferring to a decision by the California courts that upheld Gilkar and Ahmed’s parental rights over Rumi — dismissed West as a party.

“That irreparable harm from Texas’s enforcement of the California judgment matters immensely because Baby G. is in the midst of a course of several life-saving surgeries needed to treat his condition,” West’s recent filing states.

West’s attorneys contend that because of that dismissal, “future care for Baby G. is uncertain and unknowable.” One surgery has been performed on the child but Rumi’s parents have said through their lawyers that no other information about the child’s condition will be released.

West’s appeal also indicates that the couple have sued her for at least $100,000 in damages.

West’s filing also revealed that Rumi may be transferred to California and placed in hospice care. “Indeed, the child could be removed from the Texas hospital and taken to California for hospice—despite his treatable condition—around September 17, if not sooner,” her filing states.

See here, here, and here for the background. I don’t know how it is that a lawsuit in state district court can get appealed all the way to SCOTUS like that. Someone will need to explain that to me. As for the appeal itself, it sounds mostly like a disagreement about parenting decisions, and I guess you have to believe that the surrogate has standing to even entertain any of that. KERA adds some details.

West, Gilkar and Ahmed entered into a surrogacy agreement last year in which West agreed to terminate the pregnancy at the genetic parents’ request if doctors detected a fetal abnormality. The fetus was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome in April, about 20 weeks into West’s pregnancy.

Gilkar and Ahmed requested West have an abortion. West scheduled at least two different appointments to get the abortion, but she testified in court last month that she couldn’t go through with the procedure.

West alleges Gilkar and Ahmed then further pressured her to get an abortion. Gilkar, who also testified, said she and her husband pivoted to finding medical care for their unborn son once West refused an abortion.

But West then withheld medical records from the couple, Gilkar testified, and did not inform them of her move to Texas ahead of time. West made the move because Dallas hospitals could provide life-saving care for the child, and she had a support system here, she said. West also connected with anti-abortion organizations, including Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton soon intervened in the case, asking a judge to issue an emergency order requiring doctors to provide the boy “stabilizing and life-sustaining” care upon his live birth. Paxton withdrew from the case after the child was born Aug. 12 and doctors performed the Norwood procedure, the first of three open-heart surgeries needed to treat his heart defect.

The newborn had breathing problems and received a blood transfusion after the surgery, Gilkar testified.

West wrote in a New York Post op-ed that the genetic parents committing to providing life-saving care for the child was “all it would take to end” the litigation, but later backtracked, saying in court she would continue the case. Although Gilkar testified she and her husband would continue pursuing surgery for the boy, West’s testimony indicated she didn’t believe them.

West still doesn’t, according to Wednesday’s petition, because Ahmed and Gilkar are still challenging the order Paxton obtained in Dallas court.

“If successful, they will be permitted to do what the Texas Attorney General thus far prevented them from doing: decline to provide Baby G. with any further care,” the filing reads.

Still pending is West’s lawsuit in Alaska asking a trial court to deem her the child’s legal parent.

I don’t think I knew that there was a lawsuit in Alaska as well. Ms. West is a busy litigant. I don’t think any of her actions have merit, but I have no idea how this will play out.

Posted in Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Republicans go all in on AI slop ads

I have three things to say about this.

Facing increasingly tight polling and an apparent inability to make dirt stick on their Democratic rivals, two of Texas’ highest-profile Republican elected officials have resorted to using artificial intelligence to generate phony footage for their attack ads.

Lt. Gov. Patrick used controversial AI deepfake technology in a spot that debuted over Labor Day weekend mocking Texas Democrats running this election cycle.

Meanwhile, Attorney General Ken Paxton’s campaign debuted an AI-generated ad showing James Talarico reading fake passages from the Bible — an apparent attempt to slam the state rep’s background as a seminarian. The spot was released to coincided with the Republican Midterm Convention in Dallas.

“Ken Paxton and his billionaire backers are using AI deepfake videos to literally put words in James’ mouth because they can’t rely on facts to win this race,” Talarico campaign spokesman JT Ennis told the Current.

Patrick’s political ad, posted on his social media accounts, featured the likenesses of his Democratic challenger Vikki Goodwin as well as those of Talarico and gubernatorial candidate Gina Hinojosa, also Democrats.

The phony clip shows Goodwin playing spoilsport at a University of Texas Longhorns football game as she proposes new taxes, including a soda tax, a brisket tax, a happiness tax and a “nostalgia surcharge.”

“They should be chanting taxes instead!” the digitally generated Goodwin is shown saying as the crowd chants “Texas.”

Next, the clip shows a phony Gina Hinojosa appearing at Texas Tech to demand a permit for Red Raider fans’ finger guns.

Finally, the spot includes fake footage of Talarico at a Texas A&M game eating tofu and asking why the 12th Man has to be so gendered.

Goodwin told the Current during a Wednesday phone call that the ads’ fake images and fabricated statements show the desperation of Patrick’s campaign.

“My platform is something that resonates with people, so I don’t really need to lie,” Goodwin said. “There’s a lot of information out there about my opponent already, so there’s not any need for me to put out negative AI ads.”

1. This is both desperate, as Rep. Goodwin says, and pathetic. I will be far from the first person to observe how these guys never had to engage with their opponents before, and it shows. We can all have our own opinions of AI and its usage, but we can all also agree that chumps make AI slop like this. You can see the ads embedded in the story, but why would you? Your brain gets rotted enough by the Internet without going out of your way to watch this stuff.

2. That doesn’t mean it won’t work. People aren’t good at all at distinguishing deepfakes from reality, mostly because at this point the video quality of the deepfakes is too damn convincing. There are other context clues, and really anyone with an ounce of critical thinking ability ought to see right through these. But it might sway some reluctant Republicans to get out and vote. Whatever happens in the election, we’ll never really know what if any effect they had. I doubt it will be much, but I also doubt it will be zero.

3. There’s no valid reason why these ads should be allowed to run. Spare me your First Amendment arguments, this is “shouting FIRE in a crowded theater” stuff to me. The public good outweighs Dan Patrick’s artistic license. I have no idea what the best way to disincentivize the use of these things, but I’m open to any and all reasonable suggestions. It will be nothing but this from now till the end of time if there’s any belief that they’re effective. Those who will want to outlaw this crap will have a very limited window of opportunity to take action against it.

UPDATE: Per John Moritz in the Chron:

All this begs the question: Is it legal to use deepfake ads in political races in Texas?

Short answer, yes. But a 2019 state law says they cannot be used in the final 30 days of a campaign. Deepfakes are not regulated in federal races.

Good to know. Let’s all be prepared to file complaints if we see them after October 4.

Posted in Election 2026 | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fifth Circuit again rejects DREAM Act intervention effort

It’s like they just don’t give a crap.

The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied advocacy groups’ bid for a new hearing to defend the Texas Dream Act, a state law that granted in-state tuition rates at public universities for undocumented students.

In July, a panel of three judges from the federal appeals court ruled 2-1 that Austin Community College and advocacy groups could not intervene in a lawsuit that ended the Texas Dream Act. The panel said federal law bans colleges from offering benefits to undocumented students unless citizens, including out-of-state residents, are also eligible.

In response, the advocacy groups requested an “en banc” hearing, an appeal for the full bench of federal judges to rehear the case. For the case to be reconsidered, at least one judge must request a vote on whether to take up the case again, and a majority of the judges must agree.

None of the judges requested the court be polled on whether to rehear the case, according to Tuesday’s ruling.

The denial marks the latest legal blow to the first-of-its-kind state law, which granted students who had lived in Texas for three years before high school graduation in-state tuition at public colleges and universities.

Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is representing one of the groups in the case, said he was “disappointed” in the court’s denial to rehear what he called a “terribly flawed panel decision.”

“We are considering our best option to protect the rights of the many Texans who relied upon tuition equity and the Texas Dream Act to pursue higher education,” he said in a statement.

See here for the previous update. All they’re asking for is the chance to provide a defense for this decades-old law that the state of Texas refuses to defend. It seems like the most basic of principles that someone should be allowed to do that, and yet here we are. They wouldn’t even let the whole court hear the motion. It’s as cowardly as it is corrupt. And now the only move I can see is SCOTUS. It’s ridiculous. The Trib has more.

Posted in La Migra, Legal matters | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment