Bel Canto is the story of a kidnapping gone wrong, turning into a months-long hostage situation. It is the story of love, of relationships, and of art and beauty. For part of the time I read the book, I felt as if I was in a room filled with rose-colored light. Some of the story was so achyingly beautiful that it was as if I had caught a snowflake in my hand and was able to closely examine all of its intricuit wonder in slow-motion without it melting at all. But, as you can probably guess by the question of comedy versus tragedy, and the information that the book is about hostages, the snowflake does melt, the story does end, and the ending is not at all beautiful. The book does end with a wedding between hostages after their release. And that, I think, is what threw me in reading the book. Even when I knew things in the story were going to change and get worse, the ending was beyond my expectations.
It is hard to read books where you fall in love with the characters only to be denied a ending that is happy. For the Greeks, tragedy provided a chance to expereince great emotion in a controlled environment--the same reason some people watch horror movies today. Even knowing that, I'm not sure of the purpose of the tragedy in this book. In other books I've read recently, the tragedy in the story has been awful, but has taught me how I do, or do not, want to behave were I ever in a similar situation. With Bel Canto, the tragedy was externally driven, so I don't feel that same acceptance of it. Although I can't neatly wrap up this tragedy, I'm glad I read this book for the beauty and love of the happier times.