Hostname: page-component-8678677fb7-rgs65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-03T06:28:47.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language in the Americas

Review products

Language in the Americas. By Joseph H.Greenberg. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1987. Pp. x, 438.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Lyle Campbell
Lyle Campbell*
Affiliation:
SUNY Albany
*
Department of Anthropology, SUNY at Albany, Albany, NY 12222
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Language , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , September 1988 , pp. 591 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

* I would like to thank William Bright, Adolfo Constenla, Ives Goddard, Terrence Kaufman, and Paul Newman for helpful and thoughtful comments on versions of this paper; I hasten, however, to absolve them of any unwanted association with the claims I make herein.

References

Andrews, E. Wyllys V. 1970. Correspondencias fonológicas entre el lenca y una lengua mayanse. Estudios de Cultura Maya 8. 341–87.Google Scholar
Bender, Marvin L. 1969. Chance CVC correspondences in unrelated languages. Lg. 35. 519–31.Google Scholar
Bergslund, Knut. 1959. The Eskimo-Uralic hypothesis. Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 61. 3–29.Google Scholar
Berman, Howard. 1983. Some California Penutian morphological elements. IJAL 49. 400–12.Google Scholar
Bonnerjea, René. 1978. A comparison between Eskimo-Aleut and Uralo-Altaic demonstrative elements, numerals, and other related semantic problems. IJAL 44. 40–55.Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl. 1964. Huavestudien I und II: Uralisches im Huave. Études Finno-ougriennes 1. 18–27, 167–75.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1976. The first Hokan conference: Conclusions. Hokan studies, ed. by Langdon, Margaret and Silver, Shirley, 361–3. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 1984. The classification of North American and Meso-American Indian languages. American Indian linguistics and literature, 3–30. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Daniel G. 1869. [The nature of the Maya group of languages.] Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 11. 4–6.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil H., and Witkowski, Stanley R. 1979. Aspects of the phonological history of Mayan-Zoquean. IJAL 45. 34–47.Google Scholar
Callaghan, Catherine A., and Miller, Wick R. 1962. Swadesh's Macro-Mixtecan hypothesis and English. Southwest Journal of Anthropology 18. 278–85.10.1086/soutjanth.18.3.3628879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1973. Distant genetic relationships and the Maya-Chipaya hypothesis. Anthropological Linguistics 15:3.113–35.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1975. Constraints on sound change. The Nordic languages and modern linguistics, ed. by Dalstedt, Karl-Hampus, 2. 388–406. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1976. The linguistic prehistory of the southern Mesoamerican periphery. Fronteras de Mesoamérica. Mesa redonda 14. 157–84. Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1977. Quichean linguistic prehistory. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 81.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1978a. Distant genetic relationship and diffusion: A Mesoamerican perspective. Proceedings of the International Congress of Americanists 52. 595–605. Paris.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1978b. Quichean prehistory: Linguistic contributions. Papers in Mayan linguistics, ed. by England, Nora C., 25–54. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1980. Coahuiltecan. Encyclopedia of Indians of the Americas 4. 265–7. St. Clair Shores, Michigan: Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1986. Cautions about loan words and sound correspondences. Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries: In honor of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday, ed. by Kastovsky, D. and Szwedek, A., 221–5. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle., and Kaufman, Terrence. 1976. A handbook of the Xincan languages. University of Pittsburgh, ms.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1981. On Mesoamerican linguistics. American Anthropologist 82. 850–7.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1983. Mesoamerican historical linguistics and distant genetic relationship: Getting it straight. American Anthropologist 85. 362–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Mithun, Marianne. 1979a. North American Indian historical linguistics in current perspective. In Campbell & Mithun 1979b, 3–69.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Mithun, Marianne. (eds.) 1979b. The languages of Native America: Historical and comparative assessment. Austin: University of Texas Press. [LNA].Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle, and Oltrogge, David. 1980. Proto-Tol (Jicaque). IJAL 46. 205–23.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Review of Language in the Americas, by Greenberg, Joseph H. Current Anthropology 28. 652–3.Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn. 1947. La parenté linguistique et le calcul des probabilités. Uppsala universitets årskrift 1949. 1–24.Google Scholar
Constenla, Adolfo. 1981. Comparative Chibchan phonology. University of Pennsylvania dissertation. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Conzemius, Eduard. 1930. Une tribu inconnue de Costa-Rica: Les indiens Rama du Rio Zapote. L'Anthropologie 40. 93–108.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna. 1987. Review of Language in the Americas, by Greenberg, Joseph H. Current Anthropology 28. 653–6.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna., and Sherzer, Joel. 1971. Areal linguistic studies in North America: A historical perspective. IJAL 37. 20–8.Google Scholar
Dixon, Roland B., and Kroeber, Alfred L. 1913a. Relationships of Indian languages in California. Science, n.s. 37.225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Roland B., and Kroeber, Alfred L. 1913b. New linguistic families in California. American Anthropologist 15. 647–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duponceau, Peter Stephen. 1838. Mémoire sur le système grammatical des langues de quelques nations indiennes de l'Amérique du Nord. Paris.Google Scholar
Fleming, Harold. 1987. The Stanford conference: As seen by Hal Fleming. Mother Tongue: Newsletter of the Long Range Comparison Club 4.24. Boston University.Google Scholar
Fox, James A. 1978. Proto-Mayan accent, morpheme structure conditions, and velar innovations. University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
Frankle, Eleanor. 1984a. Las relaciones externas entre las lenguas Mayances y altaicas. Investigaciones recientes en el área maya. XVII Mesa Redonda Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, 1. 209–25.Google Scholar
Frankle, Eleanor. 1984b. Los morfemas vocálicos para derivaciones verbales en los grupos mayance y túrquico. Investigaciones recientes en el área maya. XVII Mesa Redonda Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, 2. 517–24.Google Scholar
Freeland, Lucy S. 1930. The relationship of Mixe to the Penutian family. IJAL 6. 28–36.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1975. Algonquian, Wiyot, and Yurok: Proving a distant genetic relationship. Linguistics and anthropology in honor of C. F. Voegelin, ed. by Kinkade, M. Dale, Hale, Kenneth L., and Werner, Oswald, 249–62. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1979. The languages of south Texas and the lower Rio Grande. In Campbell & Mithun 1979b, 355–89.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1987. Review of Language in the Americas, by Greenberg, Joseph H. Current Anthropology 28. 656–7.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor. 1980. Some Yokuts-Maidun comparisons. American Indian and Indo-european studies: Papers in honor of Madison S. Beeler, ed. by Klar, K., Langdon, M., and Silver, S., 57–65. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor. (ed.) 1984. The Sapir-Kroeber correspondence. (Survey of California and other Indian languages, 6.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1948. The classification of African languages. American Anthropologist 50. 24–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.. 1955. Studies in African linguistic classification. Branford, Connecticut: The Language and Communication Research Center, Columbia University, and The Program of African Studies, Northwestern University. Reprinted from Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 5. 79–100, 190–8, 309–17 (1949), 6. 47–63, 143–60, 223–37 (1950), 10. 405–15 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. The general classification of Central and South American languages. Men and cultures: Selected papers of the 5th International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, 1956, ed. by Wallace, Anthony, 791–94. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. The languages of Africa. IJAL Vol. 29, No. 1, Part II (Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, Publication 25.).Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1979. The classification of American Indian languages. Papers of the 1978 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, ed. by Cooley, Ralph E. et al., 7–22. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H., and Swadesh, Morris. 1953. Jicaque as a Hokan language. IJAL 19. 216–22.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H., Turner, Christy G. II; and Zegura, Stephen L. 1985. Convergence of evidence for the peopling of the Americas. Collegium Antropologicum 9.1:33–42.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H., Turner, Christy G. II; and Zegura, Stephen L. 1986. The settlement of the Americas: A comparison of the linguistic, dental and genetic evidence. Current Anthropology 27. 477–97.10.1086/203472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1958a. Algonkian-Ritwan: The end of a controversy. IJAL 24. 159–73.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1958b. A new linguistic relationship in North America: Algonkian and the Gulf languages. Southwest Journal of Anthropology 14. 231–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1969. Grammar or lexicon? The American Indian side of the question from Duponceau to Powell. IJAL 35. 239–55.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1967. On Maya-Chipayan. IJAL 33. 74–6.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1970. Maya-Chipaya and typology of labials. CLS 6. 20–2.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. 1971. On Mayan-Araucanian comparative phonology. IJAL 37. 156–9.Google Scholar
Harrington, John P. 1913. [Announcement of relationship of Yuman and Chumashan.] American Anthropologist 15.716.Google Scholar
Harrington, John P. 1917. [Announcement of relationship of Washo and Chumashan.] American Anthropologist 19.154.Google Scholar
Holt, Dennis. 1976. La lengua paya y las fronteras lingüísticas de Mesoamérica. XIV Mesa Redonda de la Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, 1. 149–56. Mexico.Google Scholar
Holt, Dennis. 1986. The development of the Paya sound-system. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1964. Evidence for Penutian in lexical sets with initial *C- and *S-. IJAL 30. 213–42.Google Scholar
Justeson, John, Norman, William, Campbell, Lyle; and Kaufman, Terrence. 1985. The foreign impact on lowland Mayan language and script. (Middle American Research Institute, Publication 33.) New Orleans: Tulane University.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1973. Areal linguistics and Middle America. Current Trends in linguistics, ed. by Sebeok, Thomas, 11. 459–83. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1974a. Idiomas de Mesoamérica. (Seminario de Integración Social Guatemalteca, pub. 33.) Guatemala: Editorial José de Pomada Ibarra.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence. 1974b. Meso-American Indian languages. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edn., vol. 11. 956–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. 1856. On the probable origin of the American Indians, with particular reference to that of the Caribs. Journal of the Ethnological Society 4. 226–67.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1978. Araucanian genetic relationships. IJAL 44. 280–93.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1981a. Intercontinental linguistic connections. (Humanities Inaugural Lecture Series.) Irvine: University of California.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1981b. North and South American linguistic connections. La Linguistique 17:1.3–18.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie. 1984. Polynesian and American linguistic connections. (Edward Sapir monograph series in language, culture, and cognition, 12; supplement to Forum Linguisticum 8:3.) Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar
Key, Mary Ritchie., and Clairis, Christos. 1978. Fuegian and central South American language relationships. International Congress of Americanists 52:4.635–45. Paris.Google Scholar
Klein, Harriet E. Manelis, and Stark, Louisa R. 1985. South American Indian languages. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Michael E. 1979. Na-Dene and Eskimo-Aleut. In Campbell & Mithun 1979b, 803–901.Google Scholar
Langdon, Margaret. 1979. Some thoughts on Hokan with particular reference to Pomoan and Yuman. In Campbell & Mithun 1979b, 592–649.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Walter. 1920. Zentral-Amerika. Berlin: Museum für Völkerkunde zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Levine, Robert D. 1979. Haida and Na-Dene: A new look at the evidence. IJAL 45. 157–70.Google Scholar
Matteson, Esther. 1972. Toward Proto Amerindian. Comparative studies in Amerindian languages, ed. by Matteson, Esther, 21–92. (Janua Linguarum, Series Practica, 127.) The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuown, Norman. 1942. Una posible síntesis lingüística macro-mayence. Mayas y olmecas, 37–8, Segunda Mesa Redonda sobre problemas antropológicos de México y Centro América. Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología.Google Scholar
McQuown, Norman. 1956. Evidence for a synthetic trend in Totonacan. Lg. 32. 78–80.Google Scholar
Membreño, Alberto. 1897. Hondureñismos: Vocabulario de los provincialismos de Honduras. 2nd edn. Tegucigalpa: Tipografía Nacional.Google Scholar
Newman, Stanley. 1964. Comparison of Zuni and California Penutian. IJAL 30. 1–13.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1971. Diminutive consonantal symbolism in western North America. Lg. 47. 826–48.Google Scholar
Olson, Ronald D. 1964. Mayan affinities with Chipaya of Bolivia, I: Correspondences. IJAL 30. 313–24.Google Scholar
Olson, Ronald D. 1965. Mayan affinities with Chipaya of Bolivia, II: Cognates. IJAL 31. 29–38.Google Scholar
Parker, Gary J. 1969. Comparative Quechua phonology and grammar IV: The evolution of Quechua A. University of Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 1:9.149–204.Google Scholar
Powell, John Wesley. 1880. Introduction to the study of Indian languag.es, with words, phrases, and sentences to be collected. 2nd edn. Washington: Bureau of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Powell, John Wesley. 1891. Indian linguistic families of America north of Mexico. Seventh annual report, Bureau of American Ethnology, 1–142. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Radin, Paul. 1919. The genetic relationship of the North American Indian languages. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 14:4.489–502.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert L. 1981. Review of The Caddoan, Iroquoian, and Siouan languages, by Chafe, Wallace. IJAL 47. 172–7.Google Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1987. A guide to the world's languages: Vol. 1: Classification. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadovsky, Otto J. 1984. The discovery of California: breaking the silence of the Siberia-to-America migrators. The Californians 2:2.9–20 (Nov/Dec.).Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1920. The Hokan and Coahuiltecan languages. IJAL 1. 280–90.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1925. The Hokan affinity of Subtiaba of Nicaragua. American Anthropologist, n.s. 27. 402–35, 491–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1929. Central and North American languages. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th edn., vol. 5. 138–41.Google Scholar
Sapir, J. David. 1987. Review of Language in the Americas, by Greenberg, Joseph H. Current Anthropology 28. 663–4.Google Scholar
Sauvageot, A. 1923. Eskimo et ouralaien. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris 15. 279–316.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert. 1952. Athapaskan and Sino-Tibetan. IJAL 18. 12–9.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert. 1957. A note on Athapaskan and Sino-Tibetan. IJAL 23. 116–7.Google Scholar
Sherzer, Joel. 1976. An areal-typological study of the American Indian languages north of Mexico. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Shipley, William F. 1980. Penutian among the ruins: A personal assessment. Berkeley Linguistics Society 6. 437–41.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Arthur P. Jr. 1973. South American Indian linguistics at the turn of the seventies. Peoples and cultures of native South America, ed. by Gross, Daniel R., 312–41. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Stark, Louisa R. 1970. Mayan affinities with Araucanian. CLS 6. 57–69.Google Scholar
Stark, Louisa R. 1972. Maya-Yunga-Chipayan: A new linguistic alignment. IJAL 38. 119–35.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1974. South American Indian languages. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th edn., vol. 17. 105–12.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1975. Estudios huaves. (Colección científica lingüística, 22.) Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1979. Observaciones sobre la evolución fonológica del tlapaneco. Anales de Antropología 16. 371–86. Mexico.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1983a. The Mesoamerican Indian languages. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1983b. La lengua tlapaneca de Malinaltepec. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Suárez, Jorge A. 1986. Elementos gramaticales otomangues en tlapaneco. Language in global perspective: Papers in honor of the 50th anniversary of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1935–1985, ed. by Elson, Benjamin E., 267–84. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1953. Mosan I: A problem of remote common origin. IJAL 29. 26–44.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1954. Perspectives and problems of Amerindian comparative linguistics. Word 10. 306–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1959a. Mapas de clasificación lingüística de México y las Américas. (Instituto de Historia, pub. 51; serie antropológica, 8.) Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1959b. The mesh principle in comparative linguistics. Anthropological Linguistics 1:2.7–14.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1966. Porhe [Tarascan] y maya. Anales de antropología 3. 173–204.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1967. Lexicostatistic classification. Handbook of Middle American Indians, ed. by McQuown, Norman, 5. 79–115. Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teeter, Karl. 1964. Algonquian languages and genetic relationship. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, 1026–33. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Thalbitzer, W. 1928. Is there any connection between the Eskimo language and the Uralian? Atti del XXII Congresso Internationale degli Americanisti, 551–67.Google Scholar
Thalbitzer, W. 1944. Uhlenbeck's Eskimo–Indo-European hypothesis: A critical review. Études linguistiques 1944. 66–96.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward B. 1871. Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, C. C. 1905. Uralische Anklänge in den Eskimosprachen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 1905. 757–65.Google Scholar
Uhlenbeck, C. C. 1942–5. Ur- und altindogermanische Anklänge im Wortschatz des Eskimos. Anthropos 37–40.133–48.Google Scholar
Whistler, Kenneth W. 1977. Wintun prehistory: An interpretation based on linguistic reconstruction of plant and animal nomenclature. Berkeley Linguistics Society 3. 157–74.Google Scholar
Wikander, Stig. 1967. Maya and Altaic: Is the Maya group of languages related to the Altaic family? Ethnos 32. 141–8.10.1080/00141844.1967.9980993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikander, Stig. 1970. Maya and Altaic II. Ethnos 35. 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikander, Stig. 1970–71. Maya and Altaic III. Orientalia Suecana 19–20.186–204.Google Scholar
Witkowski, Stanley R., and Brown, Cecil H. 1978. Mesoamerican: A proposed language phylum. American Anthropologist 80. 942–4.10.1525/aa.1978.80.4.02a00130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkowski, Stanley R., and Brown, Cecil H. 1981. Mesoamerican historical linguistics and distant genetic relationship. American Anthropologist 83. 905–11.10.1525/aa.1981.83.4.02a00150CrossRefGoogle Scholar