User talk:PresentlySuraye3

Your nomination of Farid Nuzha has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Farid Nuzha has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 15:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Good Article Gazette, Special issue

Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter

Special issue - 28 July 2026

With several major discussions underway

Ongoing discussions		Current statistics
Likely invalid GAN review on Brewing Potential extra requirements for new reviewers Making WP:Good article reviewing guide a guideline instead of WP:Reviewing good articles Making the instructions more accessible Making the review closing tool easier to use How to handle inappropriate reviews	Handling a potentially biased review Model reviews Time for GAN QPQ (sort of) Proposed system for upgrading B-class articles to GA without formal review Time for an RfC on changes to GA Contribute at the August 2026 RfC page	Number of GAs: 44,523 (+52) Number of nominations: 954 (+33) GAs for reassessment: 26 (-8)

• Subscribe to the newsletter
• Review an article!
• Participate in review circles
• Acquire a mentor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pokémon Picross is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Pokémon Picross is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 05:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Assyrian naming dispute is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Assyrian naming dispute is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RandFreeman -- RandFreeman (talk) 21:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of 2025 Duhok axe attack has passed

Your good article nomination of the article 2025 Duhok axe attack has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ABehjat -- ABehjat (talk) 17:01, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Assyrian naming dispute is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Assyrian naming dispute is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rand Freeman -- Rand Freeman (talk) 05:21, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations RfC

Hi PresentlySuraye3,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox^{(talk|contributions)} 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pokémon Picross has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Pokémon Picross has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 22:26, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in WP:GARC

Hello, I noticed you are a user who has a number of open Good Article nominations and thought you might be interested in Good Article Review Circles. It is an initiative that helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you will review another user's article and get your own GA nomination reviewed in return. Check out the project page for more details! — ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 15:07, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Reverosie, thanks for the talk page message. The page for GARC says that a requirement to participate is to have a Good article mentor, but I am assuming this isn't the case for experienced participants? PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 19:46, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

It is not a requirement for experienced reviewers ‍🌷Reverosie🌷^★talk★ 21:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

I left a nomination of mine at the page, worth giving this a shot. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 21:38, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

WP:GARC: Invitation to review Believe (Staind song)

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Believe (Staind song). At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#119.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Surname Law is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Surname Law is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 10:07, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pokémon Rumble World is under review

Your good article nomination of the article Pokémon Rumble World is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monathephantom -- Monathephantom (talk) 16:27, 27 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pokémon Rumble World is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Pokémon Rumble World has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monathephantom -- Monathephantom (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Unfulfilled review pledge

Hi PresentlySuraye3, this is just a friendly reminder that you have made a pledge to review other GA nominations after receiving a review. You can see your unfulfilled pledges at WP:GARP#UNF. Please consider reviewing other GANs with pledges. Happy editing, —Kusma (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Surname Law has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Surname Law has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vestrian24Bio -- Vestrian24Bio (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

September 2026

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces (Category) for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Alternatively, add the following text directly to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:15, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

@Liz This is coming as a big surprise to me. Can you please explain what this is for? PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 03:15, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Why are you mass creating categories and then tagging them for deletion? I think you need a rest from creating categories. It's just a brief block, maybe spend some time learning more about categories and their function on this project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

@Liz, I know how categories work in article space. The reason that I mass-tagged these ones, the ones that I made earlier today, was because they revolved around a template related to language scripts. I realized that I had messed up in their creation and it created a hassle for their use, so I intended to try and start over with a different script code. I made a post at the Teahouse here .

I do not believe that this deserves a block from the Category namespace. If it created a hassle for the project, then I apologize for creating the hassle, but it was simply a misunderstanding and not ill-intent on my part. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 03:22, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

I'm also a bit confused about this block, @Liz, especially that it's a vandalism block -- I'm not seeing much in the way of vandalism? Certainly a few mistakes, but the kind that warrant a conversation, not a no conversation-block.

PresentlySuraye3, I'd really encourage filing an unblock request, repeating the contents of your first paragraph here, emphasizing that it was a mistake that, from the sounds of it, won't happen again? GreenLipstickLesbian💌🧸 18:27, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

I've lifted the block. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Pokémon Rumble World has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Pokémon Rumble World has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Monathephantom -- Monathephantom (talk) 13:07, 8 September 2026 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello PresentlySuraye3! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Create userbox templates from existing writing system categories, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2026 (UTC)