Skip to content

[BugFix] Fix multi-node offline data-parallel - #18981

Merged
njhill merged 1 commit into
vllm-project:mainfrom
njhill:fix-offline-multinode-dp
May 31, 2025
Merged

njhill merged 1 commit into
vllm-project:mainfrom
njhill:fix-offline-multinode-dp

Conversation

@njhill

@njhill njhill commented May 31, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fixes #18553.

Thanks @yiz-liu for reporting and suggesting the fix.

Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>

Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
@njhill
njhill requested a review from WoosukKwon as a code owner May 31, 2025 00:23
@njhill njhill added the bug Something isn't working label May 31, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@mergify mergify Bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation v1 labels May 31, 2025
@njhill njhill added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label May 31, 2025

@houseroad houseroad left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Btw, shall we just attach the design doc link in the data_parallel.py, so folks can understand the design better?

@njhill
njhill merged commit 9a1b9b9 into vllm-project:main May 31, 2025
@njhill
njhill deleted the fix-offline-multinode-dp branch May 31, 2025 15:34
@njhill

njhill commented May 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Thanks @houseroad

Btw, shall we just attach the design doc link in the data_parallel.py, so folks can understand the design better?

Actually the design doc for online DP doesn't really apply to data_parallel.py which is an example for one-shot offline DP.

amitm02 pushed a commit to amitm02/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2025
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
amitm02 pushed a commit to amitm02/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2025
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: amit <amit.man@gmail.com>
0826joyce pushed a commit to 0826joyce/vllm-serving-optimization that referenced this pull request May 19, 2026
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
philippesic pushed a commit to philippesic/vllm-semantic-cache that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
plasticchris pushed a commit to plasticchris/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2026
Signed-off-by: Nick Hill <nhill@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working documentation Improvements or additions to documentation ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed v1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: data_parallel.py not working in multi-node case

2 participants