Skip to content

Revert "[v1] Add fp32 support to v1 engine through flex attn" - #19404

Merged
vllm-bot merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-19319-v1-fp32
Jun 10, 2025
Merged

vllm-bot merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
revert-19319-v1-fp32

Conversation

@Isotr0py

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Reverts #19319

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@Isotr0py
Isotr0py requested a review from houseroad June 10, 2025 08:08

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Isotr0py, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've created this pull request to revert a previous change that introduced FP32 support to the V1 engine. This involves removing the specific logic and tests related to FP32 handling and restricting the V1 engine's supported data types to FP16 and BF16.

Highlights

  • Revert FP32 Support for V1 Engine: This pull request reverts the changes introduced in PR #19319, specifically removing the added support for FP32 dtype within the V1 engine.
  • Restrict V1 Engine Dtypes: The V1 engine is now explicitly restricted to only support FP16 and BF16 dtypes, disallowing others like FP32.
  • Remove FP32 Attention Backend Fallback: The logic that selected the Flex Attention backend for non-FP16/BF16 dtypes (like FP32) in the V1 CUDA platform has been removed.
  • Remove FP32 Test Cases: A test case specifically designed to verify the FP32 fallback behavior in the attention backend selector has been removed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

@mergify mergify Bot added the v1 label Jun 10, 2025

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request reverts the changes from PR #19319, which added fp32 support to the V1 engine through FlexAttention. The changes in this revert correctly undo the previous modifications:

  • Test Code: The fp32-specific test (test_fp32_fallback) and related test setups (like torch.set_default_dtype(torch.float16) and the import torch if it was solely for these) are removed from tests/kernels/attention/test_attention_selector.py and tests/v1/worker/test_gpu_model_runner.py.
  • Argument Handling: The dtype check in vllm/engine/arg_utils.py is re-instated, restricting the V1 engine to fp16 and bf16 data types.
  • Backend Selection: The logic for selecting FlexAttentionBackend for fp32 in vllm/platforms/cuda.py is removed.

The revert appears to be clean and consistent with the goal of removing fp32 support for the V1 engine as introduced by the reverted PR. No issues of medium, high, or critical severity were identified in the diff.

@houseroad houseroad added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 10, 2025
@vllm-bot
vllm-bot merged commit 5f1ac1e into main Jun 10, 2025
@vllm-bot
vllm-bot deleted the revert-19319-v1-fp32 branch June 10, 2025 08:30
0826joyce pushed a commit to 0826joyce/vllm-serving-optimization that referenced this pull request May 19, 2026
philippesic pushed a commit to philippesic/vllm-semantic-cache that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed v1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants